For an official paper copy, contact the Florida Public ServiceCommission at contact@psc.state.fl.us or call (850) 413-6770. There may be a charge for the copy.
State of Florida
Public Service
Commission
Capital Circle Office Center 2540 Shumard
Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0850
-M-E-M-O-R-A-N-D-U-M-
REVISED
DATE: |
||
TO: |
Director, Division of the Commission Clerk & Administrative Services (Bayó) |
|
FROM: |
Division of Competitive Markets & Enforcement (Moses, Casey) Office of the General Counsel (Rojas) |
|
RE: |
||
AGENDA: |
09/21/04 – Regular Agenda – Interested Persons May Participate |
|
THE CURRENT CONTRACT WITH SPRINT EXPIRES MAY 31, 2005. SIGNIFICANT TIME IS NEEDED TO ISSUE THE RFP, EVALUATE PROPOSALS, AND SET UP THE SYSTEM. |
||
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: |
REVISED original was filed on 08/26/2004 Due to interpreter availability, staff requests this item be addressed by the Commission at 11:15am or later on September 21st. |
|
FILE NAME AND LOCATION: |
S:\PSC\CMP\WP\040763.RCM.DOC |
|
This is a revised recommendation to adjust the key dates in the Request for Proposal (RFP) due to the cancellation of the September 7th Agenda Conference and to include a price evaluation formula for Captel service. Pages 16, and 51 of Attachment A have been revised.
Executive Summary
This recommendation proposes that the Commission approve the attached (RFP)
(Attachment A) to provide a telecommunications relay service system in Florida.
If approved, the RFP will be issued September 217, 2004, with the
bidders' proposals due by November 18. The current schedule calls for the
Commission to select a provider in January and for the provider to begin
furnishing service by June 1, 2005.
The RFP describes a relay service which will be in compliance with both the Florida Telecommunications Access System Act (TASA) and the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The RFP mandates many features including: 24 hour a day service every day of the year, answering time and blocking standards, confidentiality conditions, procedures for relaying a call which gives substantial control to the user in how the call is handled, communications assistant (CA) and staff requirements, provisions for complaint resolution and consumer input, and other features. In addition, the RFP allows a bidder to provide unsolicited features as part of its basic relay service for which additional evaluation points may be awarded. Bidders may also propose optional services (for which a separate price is proposed), such as Video Relay, IP-Relay, and an Account Manager, that are not part of their basic relay service, and for which additional points will not be awarded. Once a provider is selected, the Florida Public Service Commission (FPSC) will determine which of the optional services it may wish to add to the basic relay service and negotiate the conditions under which these optional services will be offered.
The FPSC shall award the contract to the bidder whose proposal is the most advantageous to the state, taking into account the following considerations in Section 427.704(3)(a), Florida Statutes:
a. The appropriateness and accessibility of the proposed telecommunications relay service for the citizens of the state, including persons who are hearing impaired or speech impaired;
b. The overall quality of the proposed telecommunications relay system;
c. The charges for the proposed telecommunications relay service system;
d. The ability and qualifications of the bidder to provide the proposed telecommunications relay service system as outlined in the RFP;
e. Any proposed service enhancements and technological enhancements which improve service without significantly increasing cost;
f. Any proposed inclusion of provision of assistance to deaf persons with special needs to access the basic telecommunications system;
g. The ability to meet the proposed commencement date for the FRS; and
h. All other factors listed in the RFP.
Each bidder will be required to submit its bid on the basis of a charge per billable minute assuming a three-year contract would be awarded with the option of four one year extensions. The price proposal must be submitted in a sealed envelope separate from the technical proposal.
The RFP also provides for a point system for evaluating the proposals. A weight of 60% will be given to the technical aspect of the proposal and a weight of 40% will be given to the price aspect of the proposal. The Proposal Review Committee (PRC), consisting of three FPSC staff members and two Advisory Committee members, will evaluate each proposal. In addition, staff from the Division of Regulatory Compliance & Consumer Assistance will review certain financial data in the proposal.
Case Background
The Telecommunications Access System Act of 1991 (TASA) became effective May 24, 1991 and is found in Chapter 427, Part II of the Florida Statutes. TASA was developed in response to two needs. The first was the need for permanent funding for the distribution of specialized telecommunications equipment for people who are hearing and speech impaired (TDDs, volume control telephones, etc.). The second motivation for TASA was the need for a telecommunications relay system whereby the cost for access to statewide basic telecommunications services for persons who have a hearing or speech impairment is no greater than the amount paid by other telecommunications customers.
The ADA required telephone companies to develop a relay system for both interstate and intrastate calls by July 1993; however, TASA mandated that a statewide telecommunications relay service be provided earlier, beginning June 1, 1992. Florida's TASA required the development of a statewide relay service that would be capable of being certified by the FCC. TASA provides funding for the distribution of specialized telecommunications devices and intrastate relay service through the imposition of a surcharge of up to $.25 per access line per month. (Accounts with over 25 lines are billed for only 25 lines).
There are several entities identified in TASA. The FPSC has overall responsibility for implementation and oversight of the system. The incumbent local exchange companies (LEC), competitive local exchange companies, and shared tenant providers have the responsibility of collecting the surcharge and submitting it to the Administrator. Florida Telecommunications Relay, Inc. (FTRI), a nonprofit corporation formed by the LECs, was named by the FPSC to serve as the TASA administrator. The provider is the entity that, as a result of being awarded the contract resulting from the RFP, will provide relay service.
The Advisory Committee (AC) is a group of up to ten individuals recommended by various organizations representing both the telephone industry and individuals with hearing, speech, or dual sensory impairments. The Advisory Committee's role is to provide input to both the FPSC and the FTRI on the development and operation of the relay system. Staff met with the Advisory Committee on April 30, 2004, to obtain its input. Two Advisory Committee members assisted staff since that meeting and their suggested changes are in the attached draft RFP.
The current contract with Sprint expires May 31, 2005. Thus, the RFP needs to be approved for issuance so that we can remain on schedule and a contract can be signed in January 2005, allowing the selected provider time to set up the system by June 1, 2005.
Discussion of Issues
Issue 1: Should the attached draft RFP be issued?
Staff Analysis: The RFP was drafted to describe as specifically as possible the relay service that should be provided. Staff has updated the RFP to include services currently being provided and to be compliant with all FCC certification requirements. Staff also considered the Advisory Committee's recommendations. The primary changes since the last RFP issued in 1999, are specifically identified below.
PRIMARY CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS RFP PROCEDURES
The location in the RFP of each of the following subject matters is referenced in parentheses by section and paragraph number. For example, (B.3) is Section B paragraph 3 of the RFP. The only changes listed below that are not already part of the existing contract are items 1, 3, 4, and 15.
1. Term of Contract (B.3): The term of the contract was changed from an initial 3 year contract with two yearly extensions to an initial 3 year contract with four yearly extensions. Staff believes this change will reduce the Commission’s cost to issue another RFP for an additional two years if the service provided is adequate. Of course, the Commission has the authority to terminate the contract at any time with proper notification. This item is a pass/fail evaluation value.
2. Access Numbers (B.5): Dialing 711 as a form of relay access was added during the existing contract which points to the voice 800 number. All other access numbers will remain the same. This item is a pass/fail evaluation value.
3. Increased CA Qualifications (B.7): The FCC increased the typing speed from 55 wpm to 60 wpm: Staff interprets the requirement that 60 wpm should be what the customers using the service should experience. Therefore, staff has included in the RFP language that requires testing of the service using prepared scripts through the relay system and requiring the CA to be able to type 60 wpm on the live test calls. Staff also included language on how the testing is to be performed.
The CA minimum qualifications was also changed from requiring only basic skills in English grammar to requiring competent skills in grammar, interpretation of typewritten ASL, familiarity with hearing and speech disability cultures, languages and etiquette. Another requirement that was added is that the CAs must have a minimum of a high school diploma or grade equivalent. This item is assigned 100 evaluation points.
4. 80% Traffic in Florida Relay Center: Staff eliminated the requirement that 80% of all Florida traffic be handled by the relay center located in Florida. Elimination of this requirement will allow the provider more flexibility in the event of heavy traffic volumes which will result in fewer blockages and hold times. It also allows the provider flexibility in the event of an emergency such as a hurricane to reroute traffic to other centers without the need of seeking Commission approval for a waiver of the 80% requirement. It may also result in a lower price being proposed.
REVISED
A disadvantage of eliminating the 80% traffic requirement is the
possibility of the loss of some jobs in the Florida center. It is difficult
for staff to determine how many jobs, if any, would be eliminated with this
change.
5. In-Call CA Replacement (B.11.j): The FCC requires that a CA must stay on a call for a minimum of 10 minutes for regular TRS calls and a minimum of 15 minutes for Speech to Speech calls. This item is part of other requirements in the same paragraph which is in total assigned 100 evaluation points.
6. Call Release Function (B.17): Call Release is a feature that allows the CA to connect two TDD users and then “release” the line leaving the two TDD users connected. The FCC added “call release” functionality to the minimum requirements for relay. This item is assigned 50 evaluation points.
7. CapTel Service (B.22): CapTel was added during the existing contract and is currently being provided at a rate of up to 100 captioning phones per month. This service uses captioning telephones and a special operator using a computer that has voice recognition software programmed to the operator’s voice which converts the operator’s voice into a captioned message to the CapTel user. The CapTel user can then read the message on the telephone screen and also listen to the person’s voice at the other end. The service is for those persons that have limited hearing, but have difficulty in distinguishing words. The company that developed the technology does not have an exclusive contract with any company; therefore, any bidding company has the ability to contract for the service. This item is assigned 100 evaluation points and is 5% of the price evaluation formula.
8. TurboCode™ (B.23): TurboCode is a technology that allows a person using a Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) machine the ability to interrupt the Communications Assistant (CA). This interrupt capability allows for faster communications for the TDD user. This item is assigned 100 evaluation points.
9. Speech to Speech Service (B.24): This service allows persons that do not have hearing impairments, but do have speech disabilities to use their own voice, or voice synthesizer, to communicate with a CA that is specially trained to understand difficult speech patterns. The CA then relays the message to the other person on the call. The FCC requires access to Speech to Speech services as part of the state certification requirements. This item is assigned 100 evaluation points.
10. Access to 900/976 (B.25): The FCC requires access to 900/976 numbers as part of the state certification requirements. This item is assigned 100 evaluation points.
11. Caller ID (B.26): This feature requires the provider to transmit at least one of the following: The number of the TRS facility, 711, or the 10-digit number of the calling party. This requirement was added by the FCC as a minimum standard. This item is assigned 100 evaluation points.
12. Emergency Calls - 911 Call Routing (B.29): The FCC redefined how a 911 call should be routed. The previous RFP only required the provider to develop and follow a policy for handling emergency calls. Now the requirement is to route the calls to a Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) capable of handling the emergency or to the PSAP that the caller would otherwise reach if calling 911 directly. This item is assigned 100 evaluation points.
13. Answer Time (B.31): Answer time was changed by the FCC to 85% of all calls must be answered within 10 seconds measured daily. The previous requirement was 90% within 10 seconds measured monthly. This item is assigned 200 evaluation points.
14. Consumer Complaint Log to the FCC (B.40): The FCC requires each state to submit a log of consumer complaints by July 1 of every year. Staff also added the requirement that the provider must respond to the contract manager within 15 days of an inquiry for consumer complaints. This item is assigned 200 evaluation points.
15. Account Manager (B.54): At the request of the Advisory Committee, staff added an Account Manager as an optional service that the Commission may use its discretion of whether to include it in the contract. This item is not assigned evaluation points.
16. State Recertification Requirement (B59.l) The FCC requires each state program to file for certification pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 64.605. The provider is required to provide the appropriate documentation necessary to file with the FCC for the state’s recertification.
17. Transfer of Customer Profiles to New Provider (B.61): The FCC requires that each outgoing provider provide the customer profiles to the incoming provider at least 60 days prior to the outgoing provider’s last day of service. This item is a pass/fail evaluation value.
Staff Analysis: Rather than a FPSC order being issued on this contractual matter, the RFP will be issued pursuant to Section 120.53(5), Florida Statutes. This docket should remain open throughout the life of the contract with the provider selected to begin providing service on June 1, 2005.
A. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES
1. Issuing Entity and Point of Contact
3. Other Applicable Laws/Legal Considerations
5. Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity and Registration
8. Questions Concerning the RFP
9. Amendments or Supplements to RFP
10. Restrictions on Communications
12. Modifications, Withdrawals, and Late Proposals
14. Rejection of Proposals, Correction of Errors
15. Public Availability of Proposals, News Releases and Public Announcements
17. Letter of Intent/Notification to Bidders
20. Oral Interviews/Site Visits/ Written Data Request
24. Cancellation/Availability of Funds
25. Public Bidder Meetings and Proprietary/Confidential Information
6. Availability of the System to Users
7. Minimum CA Qualifications/Testing
10. Counseling of CAs and Staff
11. Procedures for Relaying Communications
13. Additional Languages Served
16. Types of Calls to be Provided:
17. Call Release Functionality.
19. Three-Way Calling Functionality.
20. Voicemail and Interactive Menus
21. Voice and Hearing Carry-Over
22. CapTel or Equivalent Voice Carry-Over
25. Access to Pay Per Call Services ( i.e. 900/976)
28. Obscenity Directed at the Operator
34. Measuring Equipment Accuracy
35. Emergency Operations and Uninterruptible Power
39. Consumer Input and Participation in Advisory Committee and FPSC Proceedings
41. Charges for Incoming Calls
43. End User Billing for Intrastate Calls
44. Relaying Interstate and International Calls
45. End User Selection of Carrier
46. Recipient of Toll Revenues
47. Long Distance Call Billing
49. Unsolicited Features in Basic Relay Service
51. Custom Calling Type Services
55. Other Optional Features Not Included in Basic Relay
57. Submission of Monthly Invoice
C. TECHNICAL BID PROPOSAL FORMAT
3. Public Entity Crimes Provision
5. Experience and Customer References
8. Check List of Proposal Content
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
This Request For Proposals (RFP) is issued by the Florida Public Service Commission (FPSC). The FPSC’s Proposals Review Committee (PRC) Chairman is the sole point of contact concerning this RFP and all communications must be made through the Chairman, Mr. Rick Moses. Mailed correspondence must be addressed to Mr. Rick Moses, c/o Ms. Blanca Bayó, Director of the Division of Commission Clerk and Administrative Services, The Florida Public Service Commission, 2540 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Tallahassee, FL 32399-0850 and should reference Docket No. 040763-TP. The PRC Chairman can be contacted at 850/413-6582 and facsimile correspondence should be directed to 805/413-6583. E-mail should be directed to the PRC Chairman at rmoses@psc.state.fl.us
The purpose of this RFP is for contracting for a Florida Relay Service (FRS) System that meets the needs of the people of the state of Florida pursuant to the Telecommunications Access System Act of 1991 and which satisfies or exceeds the relay system certification requirements of the Federal Communications Commission under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Bidders must comply with the requirements of both laws.
Section E is a summary of the billable minutes provided by the current relay provider concerning the Florida relay traffic for the months of June 2003 through July 2004. The bidder assumes all responsibility for the accuracy of data from these reports and billable minute information in using them for bidding purposes.
This RFP, and any resulting contract, shall be governed by the laws of the state of Florida. The bidders and provider shall comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations.
The contract shall be construed according to the laws of the state of Florida. Any legal proceedings against any party relating to or arising out of the RFP or any resultant contract or contractual relation shall be brought in state of Florida administrative or judicial forums. The venue will be Leon County, Florida.
This RFP contains the instructions governing the proposal to be submitted and the material to be included therein, mandatory administrative and operational requirements which a
bidder shall meet to be eligible for consideration, specific instructions for proposal submission, and evaluation criteria.
The provider shall have a Florida Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to provide local service and shall be registered with the FPSC as an Interexchange Company, or only use for relay service, telecommunications providers that have obtained the authority to provide local and intrastate long distance service in Florida. The provider shall also have the necessary FCC authority, or only use for relay service, telecommunications providers that have the necessary FCC authority to provide interstate and international service. The FPSC reserves the right to require certification or registration, whichever is appropriate, of any entity pursuant to this contract.
The following terms, when used in this RFP, have the meaning shown below.
The following dates are target dates. The FPSC reserves the right to change the dates.
Release RFP........................................................................................ September
21,7, 2004
Bidder’s Conference.............................................................. October
1, September 16, 2004
Deliver Final Questions
about RFP to PRC Chairman 3:00pm EST............................. October 8, September 28, 2004
TECHNICAL AND PRICE PROPOSAL
DUE DATE & TIME 3:00pm EST........................................................... November 18, 2004
Recommendation Presentation to the FPSC..................................................... January 4, 2005
Letter of Intent................................................................................................ January 7, 2005
Performance Bond Due................................................................. Upon Execution of Contract
Begin Service....................................................................................................... June 1, 200 5
Prior to or after
the bidders’ conference, potential bidders may submit in writing, questions
regarding the RFP. To the extent practical, such questions concerning the RFP
will be responded to at the bidders’ conference. Questions filed after the
bidders’ conference will be responded to in writing to known potential bidders,
if time permits. All questions should be received by the PRC Chairman by 3:00pm Eastern Standard Time, October 8, September 28, 2004.
In the event that it becomes necessary to revise or clarify any part of this RFP, an amendment or supplement will be provided to each bidder of record receiving the original RFP.
From the issue date of this RFP until a provider is selected, bidders are not to communicate with any FPSC Commissioner, staff member, or Advisory Committee member regarding this RFP except for:
For violation of this provision, the FPSC reserves the right to reject the proposal.
A public bidders’
conference in connection with this RFP will be held on October 1, September 16, 2004. The conference will be at 8:00am 9:30am in Room 152 of the Easley
Building, 4075 Esplanade Way, Tallahassee, Florida. The FPSC will transcribe the proceedings of the bidders’ conference. An overview of the RFP will be presented.
Written questions submitted in compliance with Paragraph A.8. above will be addressed. In addition, the PRC will make every attempt to respond to questions from the floor; however, depending on the question asked, a complete response may have to be deferred until after the conference.
Proposals may only be modified or withdrawn by the bidder up to the established filing date and time. It is the responsibility of the bidder to ensure that the proposal is received by the Division of the Commission Clerk and Administrative Services on or before the proposal due date and time. Both the technical and price proposals must be filed by November 18, 2004, at 3:00pm eastern time. Late proposals will not be accepted.
Neither the FPSC, nor the FRS system, is liable for any costs incurred by a bidder in conjunction with development of its bid.
The PRC Chairman and the FPSC reserve the right to reject any or all proposals. The PRC Chairman and the FPSC also reserve the right to accept proposals despite minor irregularities and to allow a bidder to correct such minor irregularities.
The Technical and Price proposals will each be made available to the general public within (10) days after each is opened. The price proposals will not be opened until after the technical proposals have been evaluated. The FPSC may issue press releases or public announcements concerning filed proposals or the bid process.
Failure to file a protest of either the RFP or the letter of intent within the time prescribed in subsection 120.57(3), Florida Statutes, shall constitute a waiver of proceedings under Chapter 120, Florida Statutes.
Upon selection of a potential provider by the Commission, the Commission will issue a letter of intent to the potential provider. The letter of intent is the point of entry to protest the
award pursuant to Section 120.57(3), Florida Statutes. A contract shall be completed and signed by all parties concerned within (30) days of mailing the letter of intent. If this date is not met, through no fault of the FPSC, the FPSC may elect to cancel the letter of intent and make the award to another bidder.
All bidders will receive a copy of the letter of intent by certified mail, return receipt requested.
The FPSC shall award the contract to the bidder whose proposal is the most advantageous to the state, taking into account the following considerations in Section 427.704(3)(a), Florida Statutes.
The FPSC reserves the right to make an award without discussion of proposals with the bidder. Therefore, it is important that each technical and price proposal be submitted in the most complete, understandable, and accurate manner possible.
20. Oral Interviews/Site Visits/ Written Data Request
Bidders may be asked to participate in oral interviews, respond to a written data request, make their facilities available for a site inspection by the PRC or make their financial records available for a FPSC audit. Such interviews, site visits, and/or audits will be at the bidder’s expense except that the PRC will pay for his own expenses (transportation, meals, housing, etc.). Bidders should come to oral interviews prepared to answer the PRC’s questions and the bidder’s primary contact person (person signing the letter of transmittal accompanying the RFP or his designee) shall be present at all meetings with the PRC or FPSC.
The successful bidder will be required to sign a contract which will include the following elements.
All of the above items together will constitute a complete initial contract that will be approved by the FPSC’s Executive Director on behalf of the FPSC.
To the extent provided for in Section 427.707, Florida Statutes, the FPSC, its Advisory Committee, and the PRC assume no liability with respect to the RFP, proposals, or any matters related thereto unless there is malicious purpose or wanton and willful disregard of human rights, safety, or property in the establishment, participation in or operation of the telecommunications relay service. To the fullest extent permitted by law, all prospective service providers and their assigns or successors by their participation in the RFP process, shall indemnify, save and hold the FPSC and its employees and agents, including the Advisory Committee and PRC, free and harmless from all suits, causes of action, debts, rights, judgements, claims, demands, accounts, damages, costs, losses, and expenses of whatsoever kind in law or equity, known and unknown, foreseen and unforeseen, arising from or out of the RFP and/or any subsequent acts related thereto, including, but not limited to, the recommendation of a bidder to the FPSC and any action brought by an unsuccessful bidder.
All information contained in the RFP, including any amendments and supplements thereto, reflects the best and most accurate information available to the FPSC at the time of the RFP preparation. No inaccuracies in such information shall constitute a basis for change of the payments to the provider nor a basis for legal recovery of damages, either actual, consequential, or punitive.
The FPSC shall have the right to unilaterally cancel, terminate, or suspend any ensuing contract, in whole or in part, by giving the provider 60 calendar days written notice by certified mail. If a breach of the contract by the provider occurs, the FPSC may, by written notice to the provider, terminate the contract upon 24 hours notice. Said notice shall be delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested, or in person with proof of delivery. The provisions herein do not limit the FPSC’s right to remedies at law or to damages.
Written requests for confidentiality shall be considered by the FPSC as described in Chapter 364.183, Florida Statutes. Rule 25-22.006, Florida Administrative Code, should be followed in making a request.
Meetings held between the FPSC or PRC and the bidder shall be open to the general public. Should the need arise to discuss any confidential materials, the FPSC or PRC will attempt to hold such a discussion by referring to the confidential material in a general way without closing the meeting. All meetings with bidders will be transcribed.
All material submitted regarding this RFP becomes the property of the FPSC and subject to Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, (Public Records Law). The PRC reserves the right to use any or all information/material presented in reply to the RFP, subject to any confidentiality granted via Chapter 364, Florida Statutes. Disqualification of a bidder does not eliminate this right.
By submitting a proposal, the bidder affirms that the proposed bid prices have been arrived at independently without collusion, consultation, or communications with any other bidder or competitor, that the said bid prices were not disclosed by the bidder prior to filing with the FPSC, and that no attempt was made by the bidder to induce any other person, partnership or corporation, to submit or not submit a proposal.
Any change in the contract shall be accomplished by a formal written contract amendment signed by the authorized representatives of both the FPSC and the provider. No other document or oral communications shall be construed as an amendment to the contract.
The award hereunder is subject to the provisions of Chapter 112, Florida Statutes, (Public Officers and Employees). All bidders shall disclose with their bid the name of any officer, director, or agent, who is also an employee of the state of Florida, or any of its agencies. Further, all bidders shall disclose the name of any state employee who owns, directly or indirectly, an interest of five percent or more in the bidder’s firm or any of its branches.
It is the policy of the Commission to encourage participation by minority business companies (as defined in Section 287.012, Florida Statues) in Commission contracts. If two identical bids/proposals to an invitation for bids or request for proposals are received and one response is from a minority owned company, the Commission shall enter into a contract with the minority owned company. If applicable, the bidder should include in its proposal evidence that it qualifies for the definition of a minority business.
This section of the RFP lists and describes the specific basic features of the relay service required to be provided. At the end of this section, the FPSC also requests the bidder to comment on (and in its price proposal, propose a price separate from the price for basic service for) the provision of optional services which are not required to be provided. The optional services offered will not be evaluated until after a bidder is selected; at that time, the FPSC may choose to purchase some, or all, of those services in addition to the basic services.
The commencement date for the service is June 1, 2005. Bidders shall provide a work schedule showing how they can meet that deadline and shall provide a statement that they can provide the complete service by that date.
Service shall begin on June 1, 2005. The term of the contract will be an initial three year period. Upon mutual agreement between the FPSC and the provider, the contract may allow for the term to be extended for up to four additional one year periods. The provider shall notify the Florida Public Service Commission of its desire to extend service by June 1 the year before the current service period expires. For example, if the contract service period is due to expire on May 31, 2008, the provider should notify the FPSC by June 1, 2007 that it desires a one year extension of service.
The provider shall be required to locate a relay center in the state of Florida.
The relay service shall be designed to provide the means by which a hearing, speech, or dual sensory impaired person using a TTY can communicate over the existing telecommunications network with a non-TTY user (and vice-versa) through the use of the relay system. The service shall also provide other telecommunications services to persons with hearing and speech disabilities as further described below.
The FPSC is interested in providing a relay service that is as cost efficient as possible while at the same time providing a service as equivalent to standard telecommunications service as possible.
There shall be a single access number for TDD users, a single access number for voice users, a single access number for ASCII users, and a single access number for Spanish users. The TDD access number shall be 800/955-8771, the voice access number shall be 800/955-8770, and the ASCII access number shall be 800/955-1339. The Spanish access number shall be 877/955-8773. The provider must request FPSC authority to use additional numbers for relay access (e.g. STS, other foreign languages, etc.). If a caller calls the wrong access number, the system shall process the call without requiring the caller to redial.
Access shall also be provided via “711” which shall point to the 800/955-8770 number.
The service shall be designed to relay local, intrastate, interstate, and international calls that originate or terminate in Florida. Relay service shall be available 24 hours per day every day of the year.
No restrictions shall be placed on the length or number of calls placed by customers through the relay center.
The provider shall adequately supervise and train its employees to always be courteous, considerate, and efficient in their contact and dealings with its customers and the public in general, and shall conduct periodic evaluations to ensure that courteous service is being rendered.
Bidders shall specify how they plan to demonstrate that CAs meet all necessary proficiency requirements. CAs shall be able to quickly and accurately type TDD relay messages. The provider shall use valid, unbiased tests for CAs on subjects including, but not limited to:
Any person who has not passed these tests shall not be utilized as a CA.
Each bidder shall demonstrate in its proposal how ongoing CA training will be provided by including with its proposal an outline of a proposed CA training plan. The provisions for CA training shall include, but not be limited to, an understanding of limited written English and ASL, deaf culture, needs of hearing and speech disabled and dual sensory impaired users, ability to speak in a tone of voice consistent with the intent and mood of the conversation, operation of relay telecommunications equipment, how to handle hearing and Voice Carry-Over, ethics, confidentiality and other requirements of the Provider’s operating policies and procedures. Training shall include both simulated and live on-line call handling.
All relay center staff, including management, shall receive training in ASL, deaf culture, needs of hearing, speech and dual sensory impaired users, and ethics and confidentiality. Each proposal should include an outline of a staff training plan indicating training topics and time frames as well as explaining how individuals or organizations (such as deaf service centers, state agencies, Florida Telecommunications Relay, Inc., universities, etc.) representing the hearing and speech impaired community would be used to assist with the training.
Bidders are required to outline a program for counseling and support that will help CAs and staff deal with the emotional aspects of relaying calls. Those providing this staff support shall have training in dealing with the emotional aspects of handling relay calls. However, in counseling sessions, the CA shall not give to the support person the names of callers involved. The counseling support system shall follow the confidentiality provisions of this RFP.
The system shall be designed to convey the full content of the communications. Unless requested otherwise by a user, the CA shall relay all calls according to the following procedures.
At all times, the provider shall make available CAs with the capability to provide relay service to users who use either English, Spanish, or ASL (American Sign Language) on their relay call. Translation from one language to another is not required.
The provider will not be required to serve languages other than English, Spanish, or ASL. However, additional evaluation points may be given for proposals that include how the provider would handle relay calls using one or more additional languages (e.g. French, or Creole, etc.).
On each shift the provider shall employ in the relay center at least one person who is highly knowledgeable of ASL in order to serve as an advisor/consultant to assist CAs in understanding the intent of messages and properly communicating the full content of communication.
As required by Section 427.704(1)(c), Florida Statutes, all calls shall be totally confidential; no written or electronic script shall be kept beyond the duration of the call. CAs and supervisory personnel shall not reveal information about the content of any call and, except for the minimum necessary for billing, complaint processing, statistical reporting or training purposes as further described in this RFP, shall not reveal any information about a call. CAs and supervisory personnel shall be required to sign a pledge of confidentiality promising not to disclose the identity of any callers (except for the reasons discussed in this section) or any information learned during the course of relaying calls, either during the period of employment as a CA or after termination of employment.
3) Specifics of the information conveyed.
Call release functionality is a feature that allows the CA to sign-off or “release” from the telephone line after the CA has set up a telephone call between the originating TTY caller and a called TTY party, such as when a TTY user must go through a TRS facility to contact another TTY user because the called TTY party can only be reached through a voice-only interface, such as a switchboard.
The provider shall also immediately release a call when a TTY user using the relay system is inactive for more than 30 seconds.
A feature that allows more than two parties to be on the telephone line at the same time with the CA.
CAs must alert the TRS user of the presence of a recorded message and interactive menus through a hot key on the CA’s terminal. The hot key will send text from the CA to the consumer’s TTY indicating that a recording or interactive menu has been encountered. Relay providers shall electronically capture recorded messages and retain them for the length of the
call. The provider may not impose any charges for additional calls, which must be made by the relay user in order to complete calls involving recorded or interactive messages.
The bidder shall explain how messages will be left on or retrieved from answering machines and how interaction with voice response units will be accomplished. The bidder should explain how any access code used to retrieve messages will be confidentially handled.
The bidder should explain if and how messages will be retrieved from an answering machine if the originating party calling the relay center is at the same location as the answering machine. For example, if a person is at home and cannot retrieve his messages from his own answering machine, how will the relay center accomplish retrieving the message and relaying the information to the hearing impaired person when only one telephone line exists to the residence?
The provider shall provide both voice and hearing Carry-Over upon request of the user. A TDD user may request voice Carry-Over (VCO) which will allow him/her to speak directly to the telephone user and receive the message typed back on the TDD. In addition, a TDD user may request hearing Carry-Over (HCO) which will enable the TDD user to directly hear what the telephone user is saying and type back his/her message, which will be spoken by the operator.
As part of its proposal the bidder should describe in detail how incoming 2-line VCO calls will be handled. As part of its proposal the bidder should also describe in detail how outgoing 2-line VCO calls will be handled.
The provider shall make provision for two persons who are hearing disabled to speak for themselves by means of Voice Carry-Over to Voice Carry-Over (VCO to VCO) and for two persons who are speech disabled to hear for themselves by means of Hearing Carry-Over to Hearing Carry-Over (HCO to HCO).
The provider shall provide as part of its proposal a description of how CapTel or its equivalent service will be provided, including 2-line captioned service. If an equivalent service is provided, it must be compatible with the existing CapTel telephones currently in use by end users. The provider shall price the CapTel service separately from other relay services in its price proposal.
The provider shall provide Turbocode™, or its functionally equivalent, service that allows the relay user to interrupt the CA or other TDD user as part of the basic relay system.
Pricing for this service shall be included in the basic relay price in the bidder’s price proposal.
The provider must offer Speech to Speech (STS) users the option to maintain at the relay center a list of names and telephone numbers which the STS user calls. When the STS user requests one of these names, the CA shall just repeat the name and state the telephone number to the STS user. This information must be transferred to any new STS provider.
Pricing for STS service shall be included in the basic relay service price in the bidder’s price proposal.
The provider shall provide access to pay per call services such as 900/976 numbers.
The bidder should explain how it will provide relay service users with access to pay per call services. Bidders are to describe how such access can be provided, how callers can disconnect without being charged and a methodology for billing the user directly for any charges incurred from the pay per call service. The bidder should describe how it would deal with denied pay per call calls and high bill complaints for 900/976 calls. Before placing the call, the CA shall advise the caller that there will be a charge for the call.
The bidder shall explain in the proposal how interstate and intrastate pay per call charges shall be separated for end user payment purposes.
When a TRS facility is able to transmit any calling party identifying information to the public network, the provider must pass through, to the called party, at least one of the following: The number of the TRS facility, 711, or the 10-digit number of the calling party.
This would allow the caller to have the system dial the last number called via relay without the caller having to give the number to the CA.
CAs do not have to tolerate obscenity directed at them. A proposal should specify how the provider will handle these situations.
The Provider must use a system for incoming emergency calls that, at a minimum, automatically and immediately transfers the caller to an appropriate Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP). An appropriate PSAP is either a PSAP that the caller would have reached if he had dialed 911 directly, or a PSAP that is capable of enabling the dispatch of emergency services to the caller in an expeditious manner. In addition, a CA must pass along the caller’s telephone number to the PSAP when a caller disconnects before being connected to emergency services.
The provider is responsible for ensuring that 99% of all calls reaching the relay center per day are either answered or continue to receive a ringing signal. Calls that are blocked must receive a network blockage signal of 120 interruptions per minute.
The provider is responsible for answering, except during network failure, 85% of all calls daily within 10 seconds by any method which results in the caller’s call immediately being placed, not put in a queue or on hold, of reaching the relay switch. Elapsed time is calculated from the time inbound calls reach the relay switch. In calculating the percentage of calls meeting the answer time standard, the numerator shall be the total number of calls per day that are answered (with a CA ready to serve) in 10 seconds or less. The denominator shall be the total number of calls per day reaching the relay switch except that the total shall not include calls abandoned within 10 seconds after reaching the relay switch. However, calls abandoned after 10 seconds shall be included in the denominator. (Exception: If the provider is unable to differentiate between calls abandoned within 10 seconds and those abandoned after 10 seconds of reaching the relay switch, then all abandoned calls shall be included in the denominator.)
Answer time shall be not be reported as an average speed of answer or by using a weighted service level.
It is necessary for the system to be capable of receiving and transmitting in both Baudot and ASCII codes as well as voice. It is also required that the relay system be capable of automatically identifying incoming TDD signals as either Baudot or ASCII. All equipment shall be compatible with the basic protocol of TDDs distributed in Florida through the Administrator.
Transmission levels must be maintained within industry standards as outlined in the American National Standards Institute – Network Performance – Switched Exchange Access Network Transmission specifications (ANSI T1.506-1997). The provider must provide updates
to those standards as amended by ANSI during the term of the contract and must meet the amended standards.
Every meter, recording and ticketing device used to capture call details for billing subscribers or the FPSC/Administrator as well as for providing traffic information shall be tested prior to its installation and shall be accurate 97 percent of the time to within a 1 second grace period. All equipment shall be maintained in a good state of repair consistent with safety and adequate service performance. Quarterly testing of the measuring equipment accuracy shall be performed by the provider.
In addition to a minimum of thirty (30) minutes battery capacity sufficient to operate each relay center processing Florida relay traffic at busy season busy hour load, each relay center shall have installed emergency power generating equipment capable of maintaining the relay centers’ operations. The uninterruptible power system shall support the switch system and its peripherals, switch room environmental (air conditioning, fire suppression system, emergency lights and system alarms), operator consoles/terminals, operator worksite emergency lights, and Call Detail Record recording. Provisions shall be made to meet emergencies resulting from failure of power service, sudden and prolonged increases in traffic, storms, lightning, etc. Employees shall be instructed as to the procedures to be followed in the event of emergency in order to prevent or mitigate interruption or impairment of relay service.
The bidder shall describe its plan for dealing with all types of natural and man-made problems (e.g., hurricanes, lightning strikes, fires, etc.) which either isolate the relay center and prevent calls from reaching the center or cause the center to be unable to operate. In addition, the plan should detail the steps which will be taken to deal with the problem and restore relay service.
The provider shall inform the contract manager of any major interruptions to the operation of the relay center extending beyond five minutes duration. The contract manager shall also be informed when it becomes known to the relay center that any portion of the state is isolated for more than five minutes from the relay center. The provider shall also provide a written (or e-mail) report to the contract manager after restoration of service.
Although it is not mandatory, the FPSC urges the provider to subscribe qualifying facilities for priority restoration under the Telecommunications Service Priority Program.
Appropriate intercept messages shall be provided if a system failure occurs.
The bidder shall show the capability of expanding services in response to increasing demand. The bidder shall develop and illustrate in its proposal a detailed plan of how this expansion will be accomplished. The plan shall include, but not be limited to, trunking capacity, CA workstations, personnel staffing, and equipment capacity. The plan shall also indicate how any time lag shall be avoided to meet any increased call volume. The above plans shall allow the provider to be able to maintain all standards listed in the RFP.
The users should be allowed to benefit from advancing technology. The bidder should describe the methodology and process it will use to keep abreast of technological changes in the provision of relay service, to inform the FPSC and Administrator that new enhancements are available and at what price, and to provide the FPSC the opportunity to purchase such enhancements or upgrades to the service.
The telephone users shall have input on the quality of the delivery of service. Bidders shall develop a plan to include the Commission and its Advisory Committee in any evaluation of the system. A bidder shall not include travel or per diem costs of the FPSC or its Advisory Committee in its bid price since those costs will be funded by the State. An outline of this plan shall be included with the bidder’s proposal. The plan should explain methods for consumer input and how the recommendations from these evaluations will be incorporated into the policies of the relay center. This does not preclude the provider from conducting additional internal evaluations which use relay staff. The results of any service quality evaluation shall be reported to the FPSC office within 15 calendar days after the last month in each quarter.
Bidders are encouraged to include in the consumer input plan, methods for working with organizations serving hearing and speech impaired individuals statewide to conduct periodic community forums. The community forums shall be for the purpose of gaining user input on the quality of relay service and for responding to user questions and problems on use of the relay service. The community forums shall be for the purpose of gaining user input on the quality of relay service and for responding to user questions and problems on use of the relay service. The community forums shall be planned and conducted in conjunction with organizations serving people with hearing and speech impairments.
The provider shall participate in all meetings of the Advisory Committee and all FPSC workshops and hearings relating to relay service unless excused by the contract manager.
The provider shall establish procedures regarding complaints, inquiries, and comments regarding system services and personnel. The provider shall ensure that any caller to the relay center having a complaint will be able to reach a supervisor or administrator while still online during a relay call. All complaints received by supervisors, or in writing, shall be documented, including their resolution, and kept on file and available to the Commission upon request. In addition, the relay center shall have a toll-free Customer Services telephone number available and accessible to the public statewide for the purpose of reporting service or other deficiencies. Records of such reports and copies of written reports regarding service or other deficiencies shall be maintained for the life of the contract and for twelve (12) months after conclusion of the contract period. This record shall include the name and/or address of the complainant, the date and time received, the CA identification number, the nature of the complaint, the result of any investigation, the disposition of the complaint and the date of such disposition. Each signed letter of complaint shall be acknowledged in writing or by contact by a representative of the provider. The necessary replies to inquiries propounded by the Commission’s staff concerning service or other complaints received by the Commission shall be furnished in writing within fifteen (15) days from the date of the Commission inquiry.
A complaint log compliant with the FCC reporting requirements shall be provided to the contract manager in a timely manner for filing with the FCC.
The provider shall make no charge to the users for making calls (incoming) to the relay service.
The provider shall bill for charges for collect calls, person-to-person calls, calls to or from hotel rooms and pay telephones, and calls charged to a third party. The provider shall also arrange for billing to any industry standard local exchange or competitive local exchange company calling card. For calls billed by or on behalf of the provider, the bidder shall include a complete description of how users will be billed for all calls. This description shall include the bidder’s procedures for obtaining billing information from the local exchange and competitive local exchange companies, whether the billing will be performed directly by the provider itself or contracted, specific credit cards or telephone calling cards to which calls can be billed, and a sample bill format. The bidder shall also explain how it will respond to customer inquiries about erroneous bills and how credits will be issued or refunds made.
Intrastate toll calls placed through the relay system and billed by or on behalf of the provider shall be billed to the voice or TDD caller at 50% of the provider’s rate for non-relay calls. An additional 10% discount (60% total discount) shall apply to calls to or from the dual-sensory impaired; the provider shall develop a system for identifying such users and applying the discount to their calls. Timing for timed intrastate call billing shall begin when the relay operator advises a party to proceed with the call and shall not include any initial time by the operator to explain how relay service works.
The bidder shall explain how its discount toll plan subscribers would be billed for relayed calls billed by or on behalf of the provider. For example, if a bidder offers a discount for over 5 hours of usage per month, the bidder should explain how a subscriber to that service would be billed for any relay calls made during the month.
The provider shall not charge the end user more for non-message toll relay calling than would be charged for the same call if billed by the end user’s local exchange or competitive local exchange company. The provider can accomplish this by obtaining necessary billing information about the end user’s local company in order to ensure that it does not bill in excess of those rates (e.g., extended area service calls, extended calling service calls, etc.).
In the alternative, the provider can collect necessary billing information and turn that billing information over to the end user’s local company so that the end user’s local company can bill for relay calls under the local company’s rates. If this alternative approach is taken, the provider shall submit the billing information to the local company in an industry standard format and the provider shall incur whatever costs are required to correctly format the billing information so that the local company can bill the calls.
Of the two approaches described above, the bidder should indicate how it will initially bill calls and the provider shall advise the contract manager whenever it changes billing methodologies.
The provider shall be required to relay interstate and international calls that originate or terminate in Florida. The provider shall not include in its bill for Florida relay service any charges or time associated with interstate or international calls.
If relayed interstate or international calls are to be billed by the provider to the end user at a rate higher than the rate for a non-relay call, the provider shall quote the rate to the party to be billed before beginning the call. The bidder should indicate how its rate for interstate and international calls will compare to the rate for non-relay calls and whether any discounts or additional charges will apply to interstate and international relay calls.
The provider shall allow a caller to select an available interexchange company other than the provider for completion of toll calls and billing purposes. The provider must meet current and subsequent requirements of the Network Interconnection Interoperability forum for handling end user requests for a carrier other than the provider. The bidder should include a copy of the current standard along with its proposal and the provider shall provide to the FPSC any subsequent updates in the standard as soon as they are adopted.
The relay provider or its underlying telecommunications provider shall be allowed to retain the toll revenues for all long distance calls billed by or on behalf of the relay provider or its underlying telecommunications provider.
Operator handled calls shall be carefully supervised and disconnects made promptly. A check of the timing clock shall be made at least once each twenty-four (24) hours to ensure that the clocks are synchronized and that the time is correct. Clock deviations shall not be in excess of 12 seconds. Bidders shall specify the record system for identifying and documenting long distance and toll calls for billing purposes. The record shall contain, at a minimum, the following information:
Long distance calls billed to subscribers shall be listed chronologically and reflect the connect time of such calls based on the appropriate time zone. Bidders shall also fully describe the billing system and billing process that will be used, including identification of any subcontractors, specific duties of the subcontractors, and how the billing record detail will be transmitted to the billing agent (if any).
The provider is not required to provide Special Needs services. However, consideration will be given for additional evaluation points for proposals that include Special Need services (beyond any other services for basic relay described elsewhere in their RFP) as a part of the basic relay service.
Special Needs is defined as limiting factors of a physical or literacy nature that preclude a person who is hearing, speech or dual-sensory (both hearing and visually impaired) disabled from using basic relay service. Special Needs includes: (1) physical limitations, either temporary or permanent, which preclude use of a TDD with or without adaptations for persons with manual dexterity limitations (e.g., paralysis, severe arthritis, broken fingers) and (2) markedly limited ability either to read or write English or Spanish which precludes the user from being able to use the relay service. (It should be understood that relay service does not include translation from one language to another for the Special Needs population or for any other consumers.) Special Needs does not include (1) unavailability of telephone service at the caller’s home or business, (2) inability to communicate in either English or Spanish (i.e., where caller can only communicate in a language other than English or Spanish), or (3) handling complex calls (e.g., intervening in a call with a doctor to explain a medical procedure.)
The bidder shall describe what steps will be taken to provide telecommunications assistance to persons with hearing, speech and dual-sensory impairments who have special needs. This description shall include the types of services that would be provided, the prices to end users (if any) for those services, how those services would operationally be provided, how parties other than the provider would be involved in providing Special Needs services and how the provider would assure that those parties would fulfill their portion of the service obligation.
The provider will not be required to provide unsolicited features in its basic relay service. However, consideration will be given for additional evaluation points for proposals that include unsolicited features. The cost to the state for these unsolicited features must be included within the basic relay service price proposal.
Any additional features not described elsewhere in the RFP, and which the bidder is including in its basic relay service and price proposal, which a bidder would like to propose should be fully described indicating how the feature would work, how it would improve the system, which users would benefit from the feature and any other information which would allow the FPSC and PRC to evaluate the feature. Examples might include features such as: (a) video interpreting; use of speech synthesis equipment instead of a CA to convert text to speech; use of voice recognition equipment instead of a CA to convert speech to text; (b) enhanced transmission speed, etc.
The services listed in paragraphs 51 through 55 are optional services and will not receive evaluation points for the purposes of determining which bidder will be selected to provide relay service. However, once a provider is selected, the FPSC will determine which of the services, if any, it may wish to add to the basic relay service and negotiate the conditions under which these optional services may be offered. If a bidder offers a service in this section and the FPSC chooses to purchase the service, the provider must provide the service.
For each item, the bidder should include the price per billable minute (or other basis) which it would charge for the purchase of the optional service over and above the price for basic relay service. The price per billable minute (or other basis) should be listed separately in the price proposal. The proposal should also indicate how each feature would work, how it would improve the system, which users would benefit from the feature, any direct charges that would be billed to the user, and any other information that would allow the FPSC to evaluate the feature.
The provider will not be required to provide custom calling type services such as Call Trace unless required for certification by the FCC. Call Trace is a feature which would allow the caller to dial the relay center and have the CA provide the number of the last call made to the caller via relay.
The proposed charge to the Administrator for custom calling service should be separately stated in the price proposal.
The bidder shall explain how a user could receive custom calling functionalities in conjunction with a relayed call. The bidder shall also indicate what additional cost would apply to the relay user, if any. If no separate charge to the relay user is stated, it will be assumed there is no separate charge.
The provider is not required to provide video relay service unless required for certification by the FCC. The proposed charge for this service should be separately stated in the price proposal.
The bidder should explain how it will provide and bill relay service users for video relay service. If this service is provided, before completing the call, the CA shall advise the caller of any charge for the call.
The provider is not required to provide IP-Relay service unless required for certification by the FCC. The proposed charge for this service should be separately stated in the price proposal.
The bidder should explain the responsibilities and functions that a full time account manager would provide to the relay service. No additional evaluation points will be awarded
based on a proposal to provide an account manager. The proposed charge for the account manager should be separately state in the price proposal.
Any additional features not described elsewhere in the RFP which a bidder would like to propose should be fully described.
The provider will be required to furnish an acceptable performance bond, certified or cashiers check, or bank money order equal to the estimated total first year price of the contract. The bond shall be in effect for the entire duration of the contract and provided to the FPSC upon execution of the contract.
To be acceptable to the FPSC as surety for performance bonds, a Surety Company shall comply with the following provisions:
By the 14th calendar day of the month (or the subsequent business day if the 14th falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday), the provider shall submit a detailed invoice (showing billable minutes and rates) to the Administrator [defined in Section 427.703(1)] at the contracted price
for the previous month’s activity. The accounting period used to prepare monthly invoices shall be the calendar month. Payment shall not exceed the prices contained in the contract. The invoice and supporting documentation shall be prepared in such a way as to allow the Administrator or the FPSC to audit the invoice. A copy of the monthly invoice shall be submitted to the contract manager at the same time it is submitted to the Administrator.
The provider will not be entitled to a separate payment from the FPSC or the Administrator for any travel expenses which occurs as a result of this contract.
The provider shall provide to the contract manager and the Administrator the following written reports by the 25th calendar day of each month reporting data for the previous month. (More frequent or more detailed reports shall also be provided upon request.)
The provider shall include information on its capability and willingness to provide ad hoc reports including new information in the bidder’s database or new formats for existing information.
Implementation of the Florida Relay Service in a timely matter is essential. Failure by the provider to implement the service by June 1, 2005 shall be considered a significant and material breach of the provider’s commitment. For every day the service is delayed, the provider shall pay to the Administrator, for deposit in its operating fund, the sum of $25,000 per day.
Liquidated damages shall accrue in amounts up to the following amounts per day of violation.
Any liquidated damages may be paid by means of the Administrator deducting the amount of the liquidated damage from a monthly payment to the provider. Such action shall only occur upon order of the FPSC.
When relay service is transferred to a new provider, the provider shall make every effort to ensure that service is transferred to the new provider so that relay users do not experience an interruption in service. The relay service and consumer service 800 or other telephone numbers
shall be made available to the new provider, with the new provider paying any costs associated with transferring the numbers to the new provider. Provision of customer profile data to the
incoming provider shall be provided at least 60 days prior to the outgoing provider’s last day of service.
The provider shall provide insurance coverage for itself and all of its employees used in connection with performance of services under this Agreement and ensure that all subcontractors shall be similarly covered. Such policies shall be issued by a financially sound carrier and/or
carriers. Such insurance coverage shall hold the FPSC harmless from all claims of bodily injury, including death, and property damage, including loss of use, by provider, its employees, agents or subcontractors and their employees. This insurance will include Worker’s Compensation as required by law and comprehensive general liability and bodily injury insurance in amounts that are commercially reasonable under the given circumstances.
The transmittal letter on one of the twenty copies of the complete proposal should contain the original manual signature of the person submitting the proposal on behalf of the bidder. All twenty copies should also contain the typewritten signer’s name and title. The transmittal letter shall clearly identify the complete legal name of the bidder.
Each person signing a proposal certifies that he/she is the person in the bidder’s organization authorized to make the proposal. The signer shall provide his/her affiliation with the bidder, address, telephone and facsimile numbers. If different from the person signing the proposal, the transmittal letter shall identify the person or persons (name, title, mailing address, e-mail address, telephone and facsimile number) authorized to make decisions or answer questions related to the proposal and any subsequent contract.
In the transmittal letter the bidder should state that it will comply with all requirements of the RFP or identify the sections of the RFP with which it cannot comply and expand on that explanation in the body of its proposal.
Pursuant to Section 287.133, Florida Statutes, a person or affiliate who is on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity The person or affiliate may not be awarded a contract or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity. and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided for in Florida Statute 287.017 for Category Two ($11,000) for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list.
To allow the FPSC to evaluate the financial responsibility of the bidding company, the following items shall be submitted with the proposal for the bidding company (and its parent company, if applicable):
For each state in which the bidder has or is providing relay service, the bidder shall indicate:
The bidder shall provide the names of three customer references, including specific contact name and phone number, to whom the bidder has provided the bid service or a similar service. If no customer references are available, or applicable, explain and provide three alternative references explaining the relationship of the reference to the bidder.
If the bidder proposes to use subcontractors, the bidder shall identify those subcontractors and indicate the scope of their role in the provision of relay service. The bidder should also indicate what experience the subcontractor has in providing the service for which it would contract with the provider.
If the bidder intends to use a subcontractor to provide any part of the relay service, the bidder must also provide three customer references for the subcontractor and the information required in paragraph 5.
A $500,000 bid security deposit shall be furnished to the FPSC with the original of the proposal. The bid security deposit shall be in the form of a bond, a certified or cashier’s check, or bank money order that is valid through at least February 28, 2005 and is payable to the Florida Telecommunications Relay, Inc. The bid security deposit will be held without cashing.
If a bond is used, the bond shall be issued from a reliable surety company acceptable to the FPSC, licensed to do business in the state of Florida and shall be signed by a Florida licensed Resident Agent. Such a bond shall be accompanied by a duly authenticated Power of Attorney evidencing that the person executing the bond on behalf of the surety had the authority to do so on the date of the bond.
The unsuccessful bidders’ security deposits shall be returned, without interest, within thirty (30) days after disqualification, withdrawal, or signing of the contract with the successful bidder. The successful bidder’s bid security shall be returned, without interest, upon signing of the contract and furnishing the Performance Bond as specified herein. If the successful bidder fails to sign a contract within thirty (30) days after the Letter of Intent or fails to deliver the Performance Bond as specified herein, the bid security shall be forfeited to the Florida Telecommunications Access System Fund.
As a part of the bidder’s proposal, the transmittal letter should be followed by the evaluation checklist in Section E. In the blank beside each item on the checklist, the company contact person who is responsible for the proposal and any subsequent contract and who signs the transmittal letter should initial (not check) each item in the check list which is contained within the proposal. The person initialing the checklist should ensure that each item in the checklist is also contained in its proposal and in the same order as the item appears in the checklist. The bidder should also indicate beside each item in the checklist the page number in its proposal where the item in the checklist can be found.
Bidders shall submit their bids on the basis of a charge per billable minute for all services described with the exception of CapTel in item B.22 (or its equivalent) and those optional services described in items B.51-55. The prices per billable minute (or other basis) for items in B.22 and B.51-55 shall be separately stated. A format similar to that shown below should be used for the price proposal.
NOTE: THE PRICE PROPOSAL SHALL BE FILED IN A SEPARATE SEALED ENVELOPE MARKED: “SEALED – TO BE OPENED ONLY BY THE FPSC PROPOSAL OPENING OFFICER”
SERVICE PRICE PER BILLABLE MINUTE
Bid price should be on a flat rate basis per billable minute for all billable minutes and not vary depending upon the volume of traffic.
Bid price should be on a rate per billable minute for all billable minutes and may vary depending upon the volume of traffic.
$.xx PER BILLABLE MINUTE (or other basis)
(see RFP item B.51)
$.xx PER BILLABLE MINUTE (or other basis)
(see RFP item B.52)
$.xx PER BILLABLE MINUTE (or other basis)
(see RFP item B.53)
$ xx PER MONTH (or other basis)
(See RFP item B.54)
(see RFP item B.55)
Technical proposals will be evaluated using a pass or fail criteria for some elements and using a point rating criteria for other elements. The PRC Chairperson reserves, at his discretion, the right to notify and allow a bidder a minimum time period to cure minor irregularities in both items rated on a pass/fail or a point basis. Failure to cure such minor irregularities may result in elimination of the proposal from further evaluation.
For items that are rated on a point basis, each member of the PRC will rate each item giving it a rating of between zero and the maximum point rating shown on the check list on the following pages.
The technical ratings will be based on the PRC member’s evaluation of the evaluated item using the following scale.
Where maximum points equals |
Poor |
Fair |
Good |
Excellent |
10 |
0-2.5 |
2.6-5.0 |
5.1-7.5 |
7.6-10 |
25 |
0-6.3 |
6.4-12.5 |
12.6-18.8 |
18.9-25 |
50 |
0-12.5 |
12.6-25 |
25.1-37.5 |
37.6-50 |
75 |
0-18.8 |
18.9-37.5 |
37.6-56.3 |
56.4-75 |
100 |
0-25 |
26-50 |
51-75 |
76-100 |
200 |
0-50 |
51-100 |
101-150 |
151-200 |
Total points from each PRC evaluator on the technical proposal will be added together for a total technical score. The technical score totals for each bidder will be compared by using the point total for the bidder with the highest point total as the denominator of a fraction with each bidder’s individual point total as the numerator. Each bidder’s percentage will then be multiplied by 60% to arrive at the weighted score for each bidder’s technical proposal.
Next, a weighted score for each bidder’s price proposal shall be calculated as follows. Each bidder’s price will be compared by using the lowest bidder’s bid price for basic relay service as the numerator of a fraction with each bidder’s price as the
denominator. Each bidder’s percentage will then be multiplied by 40% to arrive at the weighted percentage score for each bidder’s price proposal.
Each bidder’s weighted percentage score for its technical proposal and for its price proposal will be added together and the bidder with the highest total will be recommended by the PRC to the FPSC. However, the FPSC reserves the right to reject the PRC’s recommendation.
Evaluation Example
The following is an example of how the PRC would evaluate the bidders. The numbers used are strictly for illustrative purposes and not intended to provide any guidance in terms of what the FPSC anticipates the price, price relationships, or usage levels to be.
Assumptions:
a) Sum of total technical points by all evaluators:
Bidder A – 7,500
Bidder B – 7,000
Bidder C – 5,500
b) Bidders’ price proposals for basic relay service:
Bidder A - $.55 per billable minute
Bidder B - $.60 per billable minute
Bidder C - $.50 per billable minute
The technical evaluation is as follows:
Bidder A (7,500 points) – 7,500/7,500 = 1.000 x 60% = .6000
Bidder B (7,000 points) – 7,000/7,500 = .9333 x 60% = .5600
Bidder C (5,500 points) – 5,500/7,500 = .7333 x 60% = .4400
The price evaluation is as follows:
Bidder A ($.55 per billable minute)
- $.50/$.55 = .9091 x 3540% = .31823636
Bidder B ($.60 per billable minute)
- $.50/$.60 -= .8331 x 3540% = .29173333
Bidder C ($.50
per billable minute) - $.50/$.50 = 1.000 x 3540% = .35004000
The price evaluation for CapTel service is as follows:
Bidder A – ($1.00 per billable minute)- $1.00/$1.50=.6667 x 5%= .0333
Bidder B – ($1.20 per billable minute)- $1.20/$1.50=.8000 x 5% =. 0400
Bidder C -($1.50 per billable minute ) - $1.50/$1.50 = 1 x 5% =.0500
The total is calculated as follows:
Bidder A - .6000 (technical + .35153636
(price) = .95159636*
Bidder B - .5600 (technical) + .33173333(price)
= .89178933
Bidder C - .4400 (technical) + .4000 (price) = .8400
* Recommended by the PRC to the FPSC.
FILING CHECK LIST
Check List Item No. |
Initials of Bidder’s Contact Person |
Brief Title |
Page No. of Bidder’s Proposal |
Pass/Fail Or Maximum Points |
▬▬▬ |
▬▬▬▬ |
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ |
▬▬▬▬▬ |
▬▬▬▬ |
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
________ |
Format (RFP ref. Section C-1 and D) |
N/A |
N/A |
2. |
________ |
Transmittal Letter, Address, contact Person, Tel. and Fax No., Legal Name of Bidder, and Statement of Compliance with or lack of Compliance with RFP requirements (RFP ref. C-2) |
__________ |
P/F |
3. |
________ |
Check List (RFP ref. C-8 and E) |
__________ |
P/F |
4. |
________ |
Certification by FPSC and FCC (RFP ref. A-5) |
__________ |
P/F |
5. |
________ |
Conflict of Interest (RFP ref. A-28) |
__________ |
P/F |
6. |
________ |
Commencement Date (RFP ref. B-2) |
__________ |
P/F |
7. |
________ |
Term of Contract and Location of Relay Center (RFP ref. B-3) |
__________ |
P/F |
8. |
________ |
Scope of Service (RFP ref. B-4) |
__________ |
P/F |
9. |
________ |
Access Numbers (RFP ref. B-5) |
__________ |
P/F |
10. |
________ |
Availability of System to Users (RFP ref. B-6) |
__________ |
P/F |
11. |
________ |
Minimum CA Qualifications and Testing (RFP ref. B-7) |
__________ |
100 |
12. |
________ |
CA Training (RFP ref. B-8 |
__________ |
100 |
13. |
________ |
Staff Training (RFP ref. B-9) |
__________ |
100 |
14. |
________ |
Counseling (RFP ref. B-10) |
__________ |
25 |
15. |
________ |
Procedures for Relaying Communications (RFP ref. B-11) |
__________ |
100 |
16. |
________ |
Languages Served (RFP ref. B-12) |
__________ |
P/F |
17. |
________ |
Additional Languages Served (RFP ref. B-13) |
__________ |
25 |
18. |
________ |
Shift Advisor/ Consultant (RFP ref. B-14) |
__________ |
P/F |
19. |
________ |
Confidentiality of Calls (RFP ref. B-15) |
__________ |
P/F |
20. |
________ |
Types of Calls to be Provided (RFP ref. B-16) |
__________ |
P/F |
21. |
________ |
Call Release Functionality (RFP ref. B-17) |
__________ |
50 |
22. |
________ |
Speed Dialing (RFP ref. B-18) |
__________ |
50 |
23. |
________ |
Three-Way Calling Functionality (RFP ref. B-19) |
__________ |
50 |
24. |
________ |
Voice Mail and Interactive Menus (RFP ref. B-20) |
__________ |
50 |
25. |
________ |
Voice and Hearing Carry-Over (RFP ref. B-21) |
__________ |
100 |
26. |
________ |
CapTel or Equivalent Voice Carry-Over (RFP ref. B-22) |
__________ |
100 |
27. |
________ |
Turbocode™ (RFP ref. B-23) |
__________ |
100 |
28. |
________ |
Speech to Speech (RFP ref. B-24) |
__________ |
100 |
29. |
________ |
Access to Pay Per Call Services (RFP ref. B-25) |
__________ |
100 |
30. |
________ |
Caller ID (RFP ref. B-26) |
__________ |
100 |
31. |
________ |
Last Number Redial (RFP ref. B-27) |
__________ |
25 |
32. |
________ |
Obscenity Directed at the Operator (RFP ref. B-28) |
__________ |
P/F |
33. |
________ |
Emergency Calls (RFP ref. B-29) |
__________ |
100 |
34. |
________ |
Blockage (RFP ref. B-30) |
__________ |
200 |
35. |
________ |
Answer Time (RFP ref. B-31) |
__________ |
200 |
36. |
________ |
Equipment Compatibility (RFP ref. B-32) |
__________ |
P/F |
37. |
________ |
Transmission Levels (RFP ref. B-33) |
__________ |
P/F |
38. |
________ |
Measuring Equipment Accuracy (RFP ref. B-34) |
__________ |
P/F |
39. |
________ |
Emergency Operations and Uninterruptible Power (RFP ref. B-35) |
__________ |
100 |
40. |
________ |
Intercept Messages (RFP ref. B-36) |
__________ |
P/F |
41. |
________ |
Service Expansion (RFP ref. B-37) |
__________ |
50 |
42. |
________ |
New Technology (RFP ref. B-38) |
__________ |
50 |
43. |
________ |
Consumer Input and Participation in Advisory Committee and FPSC Proceedings (RFP ref. B-39) |
__________ |
100 |
44. |
________ |
Complaint Resolution (RFP ref. B-40) |
__________ |
200 |
45. |
________ |
Charges for Incoming Calls (RFP ref. B-41) |
__________ |
P/F |
46. |
________ |
Billing Arrangements (RFP ref. B-42) |
__________ |
50 |
47. |
________ |
End User Billing for Intrastate Calls (RFP ref. B-43) |
__________ |
50 |
48. |
________ |
Relaying Interstate and International Calls (RFP ref. B-44) |
__________ |
50 |
49. |
________ |
End User Selection of Carrier (RFP ref. B-45) |
__________ |
50 |
50. |
________ |
Recipient of toll revenues (RFP ref. B-46) |
__________ |
P/F |
51. |
________ |
Long Distance Call Billing (RFP ref. B-47) |
__________ |
50 |
52. |
________ |
Special Needs (RFP ref. B-48) |
__________ |
25 |
53. |
________ |
Unsolicited Features in Basic Relay Service (RFP ref. B-49) |
__________ |
200 |
54. |
________ |
FPSC Optional Services Not Included in Basic Relay Service but Available to Provide at Additional Cost (RFP ref. B-50) |
__________ |
Optional 0 Points |
55. |
________ |
Customer Calling Services (RFP ref. B-51) |
__________ |
Optional 0 Points |
56. |
________ |
Video Relay (RFP ref. B-52) |
__________ |
Optional 0 Points |
57. |
________ |
IP-Relay (RFP ref. B-53) |
__________ |
Optional 0 Points |
58. |
________ |
Account Manager (RFP ref. B-54) |
__________ |
Optional 0 Points |
59. |
________ |
Other Optional Features Not Included in Basic Relay (RFP ref. B-55) |
__________ |
Optional 0 Points |
60. |
________ |
Performance Bond (RFP ref. B-56) |
__________ |
P/F |
61. |
________ |
Submission of Monthly Invoice (RFP ref. B-57) |
__________ |
P/F |
62. |
________ |
Travel (RFP ref. B-58) |
__________ |
P/F |
63. |
________ |
Reporting Requirements (RFP ref. B-59) |
__________ |
P/F |
64. |
________ |
Liquidated Damages (RFP ref. B-60) |
__________ |
P/F |
65. |
________ |
Transfer to New Provider (RFP ref. B-61) |
__________ |
P/F |
66. |
________ |
Insurance Coverage (RFP ref. B-62) |
__________ |
P/F |
67. |
________ |
Public Entity Crimes (RFP ref. C-3) |
__________ |
P/F |
68. |
________ |
Financial Information (RFP ref. C-4) |
__________ |
P/F |
69. |
________ |
Experience and Customer References (RFP ref. C-5) |
__________ |
200 |
70. |
________ |
Subcontractors (RFP ref. C-6) |
__________ |
P/F |
71. |
________ |
Bid Security Deposit (RFP ref. C-7) |
__________ |
P/F |
72. |
________ |
PRICE PROPOSAL (RFP ref. Section D) Must be filed in a separate sealed envelope marked: “Sealed – To Be Opened Only By the FPSC Proposal Opening Officer.” |
__________ |
See RFP Sec. D & E. |
73. |
|
MAXIMUM TOTAL POINTS |
__________ |
2950 |
BILLABLE MINUTES (June, 2003 – August, 2004)
MONTHLY INVOICE TRS Minutes |
TOTAL SESSION MINUTES |
TOTAL SESSION MINUTES
CapTel Service |
June 2003 |
858,438 |
|
July 2003 |
877,507 |
|
August 2003 |
880,144 |
|
September 2003 |
847,985 |
|
October 2003 |
874,103 |
|
November 2003 |
815,359 |
|
December 2003 |
864,035 |
|
January 2004 |
841,703 |
|
February 2004 |
816,011 |
|
March 2004 |
873,806 |
12,180 |
April 2004 |
808,500 |
12,145 |
May 2004 |
785,894 |
22,534 |
June 2004 |
802,374 |
33,624 |
July 2004 |
801,003 |
39,474 |