For an official paper copy, contact the Florida Public ServiceCommission at contact@psc.state.fl.us or call (850) 413-6770. There may be a charge for the copy.
State of Florida
Public Service
Commission
Capital Circle Office Center 2540 Shumard
Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0850
-M-E-M-O-R-A-N-D-U-M-
DATE: |
January 6, 2004 |
|
TO: |
Director, Division of the Commission Clerk & Administrative Services (Bayó) |
|
FROM: |
Office of the General Counsel (Moore, Jaeger) Division of Economic Regulation (Hewitt, Rendell, Willis) |
|
RE: |
||
AGENDA: |
1/18/05 – Regular Agenda – Rule Adoption – Participation is Limited to Commissioners and Staff |
|
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: |
||
FILE NAME AND LOCATION: |
S:\PSC\GCL\WP\040246#2.RCM.DOC |
|
Subsection (7): This subsection provides that any increase in revenues approved under the rule is limited to a maximum of 20 percent. JAPC’s concern is the absence of any criteria for the Commission to use to set an increase of less than 20 percent. Staff explained that the limitation is meant to advise utilities that they may only have a rate application handled under the abbreviated procedures provided by this rule for increases of not more than 20 percent. At the time it approves the application, the Commission will not have the information necessary to approve a lesser amount than the utility requests. Only if the utility’s annual reports subsequently show the utility is overearning will the Commission be able to take action to reduce rates. This response did not satisfy the JAPC attorney’s concern, so Commission staff proposed deleting subsection (7) and adding to subsection (1) a provision that a utility may petition for an increase of up to 20 percent. This change resolves JAPC’s concern without altering the Commission’s authority under the rule.
Subsection (14), renumbered as (13): Staff recommends adding the citation to the specific rule that provides the method for calculating interest when a refund is ordered. This change addresses JAPC’s concern that Rule 25-30.457 as proposed does not explicitly provide criteria governing the determination of interest.
Subsection (16), renumbered as (15): JAPC staff objected to the use of the term “may” in referring to the Commission’s authority to order a refund with interest to ratepayers if it finds the utility overearned. Staff responded that whether the Commission orders a refund or makes some other disposition of the overearnings requires a case-by-case determination. Staff cited orders where the Commission has disposed of overearnings in ways other than by refund when it found an alternative was in the best interests of the customers,[1] and that the Commission would not want to bind itself to order a refund in all cases when there is no such restriction in the statute. Nevertheless, JAPC staff stated the rule is objectionable as an invalid delegation of legislative authority and that it is vague, lacks adequate standards for decision, and vests unbridled discretion in the Commission.
After some discussion with JAPC and OPC, the concerns of both were addressed by JAPC’s suggestion to change the rule to state that any overearnings shall be disposed of as provided in Section 367.081(4)(d), Florida Statutes. Subsection (4)(d) addresses overearnings from price index and pass-through rate increases, but it also provides that “the commission may order the utility to refund, with interest, the difference to the ratepayers and adjust rates accordingly.” This change removes the objectionable language without limiting the Commission’s authority to dispose of overearnings in some other manner when it finds that it is in the best interests of the customer to do so.
Staff also recommends a technical change to subsection (1), to reduce the number of copies of the application that a utility must file from an original and five to an original and two. Now that the Commission scans and electronically distributes documents that are filed, fewer copies are needed.
[1] Orders where the Commission netted overearnings with underearnings and did not order a refund: 1) Order No. PSC-01-1246-PAA-WS, issued June 4, 2001, in Docket No. 001382-WS (Pennbrooke Utilities); 2) Order No. PSC-97-1501-FOF-WS, issued November 25, 1997, in Docket No. 961364-WS (Lindrick Service Corp.); and 3) Order No. PSC-96-1205-FOF-WS, issued September 23, 1996, in Docket No. 960011-WS (Indiantown Company, Inc.)
Order where the Commission deferred overearnings for future projects:
Order PSC-00-1165-PAA-WS, issued June 27, 2000, in Docket No. 990243-WS (Sun Communities Finance - wastewater overearnings for a reuse project)
Orders where the Commission ordered the utility to spend overearnings on conservation programs:
1) Order No. PSC-00-1165-PAA-WS, issued June 27, 2000, in Docket No. 990243-WS (Sun Communities Finance - water overearnings); 2) Order No. 23809, issued November 27, 1990, in Docket No. 900338-WS (Sanlando); and 3) Order No. PSC-01-1246-PAA-WS, issued June 4, 2001, in Docket No. 001382-WS (Pennbrooke Utilities.)