WARNING:
Changes in appearance and in display of formulas, tables, and text may have occurred during translation of this document into an electronic medium. This HTML document may not be an accurate version of the official document and should not be relied on.

For an official paper copy, contact the Florida Public ServiceCommission at contact@psc.state.fl.us or call (850) 413-6770. There may be a charge for the copy.

State of Florida

Public Service Commission
Capital Circle Office Center 2540 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0850

-M-E-M-O-R-A-N-D-U-M-

DATE:

May 19, 2005

TO:

Director, Division of the Commission Clerk & Administrative Services (Bayó)

FROM:

Division of Economic Regulation (Lester)

Office of the General Counsel (Vining)

RE:

Docket No. 050006-WS – Water and wastewater industry annual reestablishment of authorized range of return on common equity for water and wastewater utilities pursuant to Section 367.081(4)(f), F.S.

AGENDA:

05/31/05 – Regular Agenda – Proposed Agency Action – Interested Persons May Participate

CRITICAL DATES:

12/30/05 – Pursuant to Section 367.081(4)(f), Florida Statutes

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:

None

FILE NAME AND LOCATION:

S:\PSC\ECR\WP\050006.RCM.DOC

 

 Case Background

Section 367.081(4)(f), Florida Statutes, authorizes the Commission to establish, not less than once each year, a leverage formula to calculate a reasonable range of returns on equity for water and wastewater (WAW) utilities.  In Docket No. 040006-WS, the Commission established the current leverage formula by Order No. PSC-04-0587-PAA-WS, issued June 10, 2004. 

This staff recommendation utilizes the current leverage formula methodology set forth in Order No. PSC-01-2514-FOF-WS, which uses returns on equity from financial models based upon an index of natural gas utilities.

 


Discussion of Issues

Issue 1:  What is the appropriate range of returns on common equity for water and wastewater (WAW) utilities pursuant to Section 367.081(4)(f), Florida Statutes?

Recommendation:  Staff recommends that the current leverage formula methodology be applied using updated financial data.  Staff recommends the following leverage formula:

            Return on Common Equity = 6.95% + 1.933/Equity Ratio

Where the Equity Ratio = Common Equity / (Common Equity + Preferred Equity + Long-Term and Short-Term Debt)

            Range:  8.88% @ 100% equity to 11.78% @ 40% equity

(LESTER)

Staff Analysis:  Section 367.081(4)(f), Florida Statutes, authorizes the Commission to establish a leverage formula to calculate a reasonable range of returns on equity for WAW utilities.  The Commission must establish this leverage formula not less than once a year.

Staff notes that the leverage formula depends on four basic assumptions:

1)             Business risk is similar for all WAW utilities;

2)             The cost of equity is an exponential function of the equity ratio;

3)             The marginal weighted average cost of investor capital is constant over the equity ratio range of 40% to 100%; and,

4)             The debt cost rate at an assumed Moody’s Baa3 bond rating, plus a 50 basis point private placement premium and a 50 basis point small utility risk premium, represents the average marginal cost of debt to a Florida WAW utility over an equity ratio range of 40% to 100%.

For these reasons, the leverage formula is assumed to be appropriate for the average Florida WAW utility.

The leverage formula relies on two return on equity (ROE) models.  Staff adjusted the results of these models to reflect differences in risk and debt cost between the index of companies used in the models and the average Florida WAW utility.  Both models include a four percent adjustment for flotation costs.  The models are as follows:

·       A Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model applied to an index of natural gas utilities (NG) that have publicly traded stock and are followed by the Value Line Investment Survey (Value Line).  The DCF model is an annual model and uses prospective growth rates.  The index consists of 12 companies that derive at least 50% of their total revenue from gas distribution service.  These companies have a median Standard and Poor’s bond rating of A. 

·       A Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) using a market return for companies followed by Value Line, the average yield on the Treasury’s long-term bonds projected by the Blue Chip Financial Forecasts, and the average beta of the index of NG utilities.  The market return for the 2005 leverage formula was calculated using an annual model.  Staff added 20 basis points to the annual model result to estimate a quarterly result.

Staff averaged the indicated returns of the above models and adjusted the result as follows:

·       A bond yield differential of 43 basis points is added to reflect the difference in yields between an A/A2 rated bond, which is the median bond rating for the NG utility index, and a BBB-/Baa3 rated bond.  Florida WAW utilities are assumed to be comparable to companies with the lowest investment grade bond rating, which is Baa3.  This adjustment compensates for the difference between the credit quality of “A” rated debt and the credit quality of the minimum investment grade rating.

·       A private placement premium of 50 basis points is added to reflect the difference in yields on publicly traded debt and privately placed debt, which is illiquid.  Investors require a premium for the lack of liquidity of privately placed debt.

·       A small utility risk premium of 50 basis points is added because the average Florida WAW utility is too small to qualify for privately placed debt.

After the above adjustments, the resulting cost of equity estimate is included in the average capital structure for the NG utilities.  The cost of equity is determined at a 40% equity ratio and the leverage formula is derived.  The derivation of the recommended leverage formula using the current methodology with updated financial data is presented in Attachment 1.

 

 


Issue 2:  Should the Commission close this docket?

Recommendation:  No.  Upon expiration of the protest period, if a timely protest is not received from a substantially affected person, the decision should become final and effective upon the issuance of a Consummating Order.  However, this docket should remain open to allow staff to monitor changes in capital market conditions and to readdress the reasonableness of the leverage formula as conditions warrant.  (VINING, LESTER)

Staff Analysis:  Upon expiration of the protest period, if a timely protest is not received from a substantially affected person, the decision should become final and effective upon the issuance of a Consummating Order.  However, this docket should remain open to allow staff to monitor changes in capital market conditions and to readdress the reasonableness of the leverage formula as conditions warrant.


                                            Attachment 1

                                                                                                          Page 1 of 6

SUMMARY OF RESULTS

Leverage Formula Update

 

Updated Results

Currently in Effect

 

(A) CAPM ROE for Natural Gas Index

10.61%

10.02%

 

(B) DCF ROE for Natural Gas Index

9.04%

9.36%

 

AVERAGE    

9.83%

9.69%

 

Bond Yield Differential

 .43%

 .43%

 

Private Placement Premium

.50%

.50%

 

Small-Utility Risk Premium

 .50%

 

 .50%

 

 

Adjustment to Reflect Required Equity

 

 

 

            Return at a 40% Equity Ratio

 .52%

 

 .28%

 

 

Cost of Equity for Average Florida WAW

 

 

 

            Utility at a 40% Equity Ratio

11.78%

11.40%

 

 

 

2004 Leverage Formula (Currently in Effect)            

Return on Common Equity      =

7.57% + 1.533/ER

Range of Returns on Equity   =

9.10% - 11.40%

 

 

2005 Leverage Formula (Recommended)           

 

Return on Common Equity      =

6.95% + 1.933/ER

 

Range of Returns on Equity   =

8.88% - 11.78%

 

 


                                                                                                       Attachment 1

                                                                                                          Page 2 of 6

 

 

Marginal Cost of Investor Capital

Average Water and Wastewater Utility

 

 

                                                                                                            Weighted

                                                                          Marginal                   Marginal

Capital Component                 Ratio                 Cost Rate                  Cost Rate

 

Common Equity                      44.85%             11.26%                     5.05% 

Total Debt                               55.15%                6.95% *                  3.83%

                                                100.00%                                             8.88%

 

A 40% equity ratio is the floor for calculating the required return on common equity.  The return on equity at a 40% equity ratio is 6.95% + 1.933/.40 = 11.78%                                                                       

 

Marginal Cost of Investor Capital

Average Water & Wastewater Utility at 40% Equity Ratio

 

                                                                                                            Weighted

                                                                          Marginal                   Marginal

Capital Component                 Ratio               Cost Rate                  Cost Rate

 

Common Equity                       40.00%                11.78%                   4.71%

Total Debt                                60.00%                  6.95% *                4.17%

                                                100.00%                                              8.88%

 

Where: ER = Equity Ratio = Common Equity/(Common Equity + Preferred Equity + Long-Term Debt + Short-Term Debt)

 

*          Assumed Baa3 rate for March 2005 plus a 50 basis point private placement premium and a 50 basis point small utility risk premium.

 

Sources:           Moody's Credit Perspectives and Value Line Selection and Opinion


                                                                                                       Attachment 1

                                                                                                          Page 3 of 6

 

ANNUAL DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW MODEL

 

INDEX

NATURAL GAS INDEX

 

MARCH

 

 

 

   VALUE LINE ISSUE:  Ed. 3 - MARCH 18, 2005 

 

 

 

 

COMPANY

       DIV 0

DIV 1

DIV2

DIV3

DIV4

EPS4

ROE4

GR1-4

GR4+

HIGH PRICE

LOW PRICE

AVG. PRICE

 

AGL RESOURCES

1.24

1.26

1.27

1.29

1.30

2.75

11.50

1.0105

1.0606

35.84

34.07

34.955

 

ATMOS ENERGY

1.24

1.26

1.29

1.32

1.35

2.30

9.00

1.0233

1.0372

28.45

26.70

27.575

 

CASCADE NAT. GAS

0.96

0.96

0.97

0.97

0.98

1.60

11.50

1.0069

1.0446

21.27

19.68

20.475

 

ENERGEN CORP

0.80

0.83

0.87

0.91

0.95

5.30

24.00

1.0460

1.1970

68.18

64.20

66.190

 

KEYSPAN CORP

1.83

1.87

1.93

1.99

2.05

3.20

10.50

1.0311

1.0377

40.90

38.21

39.555

 

LACLEDE GROUP

1.38

1.38

1.39

1.41

1.42

2.25

8.00

1.0096

1.0295

32.80

28.92

30.860

 

NICOR INC

1.88

1.92

1.97

2.03

2.08

2.65

14.50

1.0270

1.0312

38.13

36.10

37.115

 

NORTHWEST

NATURAL GAS

1.33

1.37

1.41

1.46

1.50

2.50

10.00

1.0307

1.0400

37.17

35.04

36.105

 

PEOPLES ENERGY

2.18

2.20

2.23

2.25

2.28

3.00

10.50

1.0120

1.0252

45.10

41.11

43.105

 

PIEDMONT NAT. GAS

0.92

0.98

1.02

1.06

1.10

1.60

12.00

1.0393

1.0375

24.44

22.63

23.535

 

SOUTH JERSEY IND.

1.70

1.80

1.89

1.99

2.10

4.00

13.00

1.0527

1.0618

58.40

54.25

56.325

 

WGL HOLDINGS

1.33

1.34

1.36

1.38

1.40

2.60

12.00

1.0147

1.0554

31.97

30.00

30.985

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AVERAGE

1.3992

1.4308

1.4668

1.5040

1.5425

2.81

12.2083

1.0253

1.0548

 

 

37.232

 

 

 

 

 

1.6270

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COST OF EQUITY

 

 

 

S&P STOCK GUIDE: APRIL 2005  with March Stock Prices

  

 

 

 

Stock Price w/four Percent Flotation Costs 

35.7424

Annual

9.04%

ROE

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows

 

 

 

 

1.2904        1.2109

1.1385

1.0706

1.0142

30.018

 

 

 

Present Value of Cash Flows

 

 

     35.7424

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOTE: The cash flows for this multi-stage DCF Model are derived using the average forecasted dividends and the near term and long term growth rates.  The discount rate, 9.04%, equates the cash flows with the average stock price less flotation cost.

 

$35.74       = March 2005 average stock price with a 4% flotation cost.

 

   9.04%     =    Cost of equity required to match the current stock price with the expected cash flows.

 

 Sources:

1.  Stock Prices - S&P Stock Guide, April 2005 Edition.

2.  DPS, EPS, ROE - Value Line Edition 3, March 18, 2005.


                                                                                                       Attachment 1

                                                                                                          Page 4 of 6

 

 

Capital Asset Pricing Model Cost of Equity for

Water and Wastewater Industry

 

CAPM analysis formula

 

K         =          RF + Beta(MR - RF)

 

K         =          Investor's required rate of return

 

RF       =          Risk-free rate (Blue Chip forecast for Long-term Treasury bond, April 1,                                               2005)

 

Beta     =          Measure of industry-specific risk (Average for water utilities followed by Value Line)

 

MR      =          Market return (Value Line Investment Survey

                                    For Windows, April 2005)

 

10.61%            =          5.56% + .75(12.03% - 5.56%) + .20%

 

Note:  Staff calculated the market return using an annual DCF model for a large number of dividend paying stocks followed by Value Line.  For April 2005 stock prices, the result was 11.83%.  Staff added 20 basis points to allow for the quarterly compounding of dividends.  The resulting market return is 12.03%.  Staff also added 20 basis points to the CAPM result to allow for a four-percent flotation cost.


                                                                                                       Attachment 1

                                                                                                          Page 5 of 6

 

 

BOND YIELD DIFFERENTIALS

Public Utility Long Term Bond Yield Averages

 

Long-Term Corporate Bond Yield Averages

for Avg. Public Utility

 

 

 

 

 

 

120 Month Average Spread

 

 

0.1075

 

0.1075

 

0.1075

 

0.1075

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MONTH/YEAR                

A2

SPREAD

A3

SPREAD

Baa1

SPREAD

Baa2

SPREAD

Baa3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March-2005

 

5.43

0.14

5.57

0.14

5.70

0.14

5.84

0.14

5.98

 

 

Sources:  Moody’s Credit Perspectives and Value Line Selection and Opinion

 

 


                                                                                                       Attachment 1

                                                                                                          Page 6 of 6

 

INDEX STATISTICS AND FACTS

 

 

Natural Gas Distribution Proxy Group

S & P Bond Rating

% of Gas Revenue

V/L Market Capital (millions)

Equity Ratio

Value Line Beta

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AGL Resources

A-

51%

2,265.9

41.44%

0.75

 

Atmos Energy

BBB

59%

2,120.9

40.20%

0.70

 

Cascade Natural Gas

BBB+

100%

218.5

40.07%

0.75

 

Energen Corp.

A-

56%

2,309.4

49.98%

0.70

 

KeySpan Corp.

A+

64%

6,014.6

41.80%

0.80

 

Laclede Group

A

66%

599.2

39.73%

0.75

 

NICOR Inc.

AA

87%

1,594.7

43.15%

1.05

 

Northwest Nat. Gas

A+

99%

         959.2

48.59%

0.65

 

Peoples Energy

A-

66%

1,517.0

45.25%

0.80

 

Piedmont Natural Gas

A

77%

1,700.9

51.72%

0.75

 

South Jersey Industries

A

60%

759.4

44.57%

0.55

 

WGL Holdings Inc.

AA-

63%

1,460.2

51.71%

0.75

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average:

 

 

 

44.85%

0.75

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sources:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Value Line Investment Survey for Windows, April 2005  

 

 

 

S.E.C. Forms 10Q and 10K for Companies

 

 

 

 

C.A. Turner Utilities Report, March 2005