WARNING:

Changes in appearance and in display of formulas, tables, and text may have occurred during translation of this document into an electronic medium. This HTML document may not be an accurate version of the official document and should not be relied on.

For an official paper copy, contact the Florida Public Service Commission at contact@psc.state.fl.us or call (850) 413-6770. There may be a charge for the copy.

DATE:

July 19, 2007

TO:

Office of Commission Clerk (Cole)

FROM:

Division of Economic Regulation (Gardner, Bulecza-Banks)

Office of the General Counsel (Brown)

RE:

Docket No. 070378-EI – Petition for approval of revised fossil dismantlement accrual by Florida Power & Light Company.

AGENDA:

07/31/07 – Regular Agenda – Interested Persons May Participate

COMMISSIONERS ASSIGNED:

All Commissioners

PREHEARING OFFICER:

None

CRITICAL DATES:

None

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:

None

FILE NAME AND LOCATION:

S:\PSC\ECR\WP\070378.RCM.DOC

 

 Case Background

By Order No. 24741, issued July 1, 1991, in Docket No. 890186-EI, the Commission established the methodology for accruing the costs of dismantlement for fossil-fueled production plants. Subsequently, the methodology and dismantlement study procedures were codified in Rule 25-6.04364, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), by Order No. PSC-03-1393-FOF-EI, issued December 11, 2003, in Docket No. 030714-EI, In re: Proposed adoption of Rule 25-6.04364, F.A.C., Electric Utilities Dismantlement Studies.  The methodology is dependent on three factors: estimated base costs for dismantlement, projected inflation, and a contingency factor.  The Rule requires electric companies to file site specific dismantlement studies at least once every four years from the submission date of the previous study unless otherwise required by Commission order. The Commission approved FPL’s current fossil dismantlement accruals by Order No. PSC-04-0203-CO-EI, issued February 23, 2004, in Docket No. 030558-EI.  The annual accruals were effective January 1, 2003. On June 21, 2007, Florida Power & Light Company (FPL or company) filed its revised fossil dismantlement site-specific cost studies.  FPL requests preliminary implementation of its proposed revised annual dismantlement accruals, effective January 1, 2007.

On March 22, 2005, the parties in Docket No. 050045-EI, In Re: Petition for rate increase by Florida Power and Light Company; and in Docket 050188-EI, In Re: 2005 comprehensive depreciation study by Florida Power and Light Company, filed a Stipulation and Settlement (Stipulation) that extended FPL’s existing revenue sharing plan through the end of 2009.  The Commission approved the Stipulation by Order No. PSC-05-0902-S-EI, issued September 14, 2005.  The Stipulation precludes the revision of FPL’s depreciation rates for the term of the Stipulation, but does not preclude the revision of FPL’s dismantlement accruals.

Staff’s recommendation addresses the company’s request for preliminary implementation. The Commission has jurisdiction in this matter pursuant to Sections 366.04, 366.05, 366.06, and 366.07, Florida Statutes.


Discussion of Issues

Issue 1

 Should the Commission approve FPL's proposed annual dismantlement accruals on a preliminary basis?

Recommendation

 Yes. FPL’s proposed annual dismantlement accruals as shown on Attachment A and B should be approved on a preliminary basis.  The effect of this proposal would decrease dismantlement expenses by an estimated $3,323,514 for 2007 and $3,124,256 from 2008 through 2010. On May 1, 2007, Turkey Point Unit 5 was placed in service, and the company is requesting a half year’s dismantlement accrual for 2007. The expenses are subject to true-up when the Commission takes final action in December 2007.  (Gardner)

Staff Analysis

 FPL requests that it be allowed to implement its proposed provision for dismantlement on a preliminary basis.  The expenses should be trued-up when final Commission action is taken in December 2007. According to FPL, the annual accrual net decrease is attributable to a change in Global Insight’s[1] methodology in establishing the current inflation factors, from the methodology used in the last fossil dismantlement study.  Also, included in this study is the company’s request to use a half year’s dismantlement accrual for Turkey Point Unit 5 for 2007 and full year’s dismantlement accrual beginning 2008 through 2010, as shown on Attachment A and B, respectively.

Preliminary implementation does not imply that, upon completion of the review of the company’s filed study, staff will be in full agreement with the company’s proposals. Staff is only recommending preliminary implementation of the proposed dismantlement provisions shown on Attachments A and B, because it is likely to result in more appropriate expenses than the current dismantlement accruals. The dismantlement accruals are subject to true-up upon final Commission action in this docket.

Since FPL's 2003 dismantlement study, base cost estimates for the various dismantlement activities have changed as shown below:

 

FOSSIL DISMANTLEMENT BASE COST ESTIMATES

 

2003 Study

2007 Study

 

($)

($)

Cape Canaveral

12,698,822

12,953.491

Cutler

7,890,950

8,035,610

Fort Lauderdale

21,013,706

18,956,572

Ft. Myers

19,659,288

22,877,762

Manatee

38,735,568

53,698,856

Martin

57,422,630

57,337,705

Port Everglades

36,502,177

52,594,168

Putnam

7,774,579

9,403,254

Riviera

17,066,500

13,583,544

Sanford

27,356,897

28,650,916

Scherer

25,868,542

37,391,063

St. Johns River Power Park

17,652,261

19,548,345

Turkey Point

24,277,678

18,323,729

                Total

313,919,598

353,355,015

 

Both the 2003 cost estimates and the resulting 2007 study cost estimates include a 16% contingency factor.  The company states that the contingency percentage covers costs associated with delays occurring after dismantlement begins due to such causes as equipment failure and weather delays. Also, the net increase in cost estimates is attributable to an increase in labor rates, value of scrap metals, disposal costs, and the impact of extension of the recovery periods.

Staff expects to complete its review and bring the final recommendation addressing FPL’s fossil dismantlement study to Agenda in December 2007.  Staff recommends that FPL be allowed to implement its proposed revised dismantlement accruals shown on Attachment A on a preliminary basis.


Issue 2

 What should be the implementation date for the preliminary annual dismantlement accruals?

Recommendation

 Staff recommends a January 1, 2007, implementation date for FPL’s preliminary implementation of its proposed dismantlement provision.  (Gardner)

Staff Analysis

 FPL requests a January 1, 2007, implementation date for its revised annual dismantlement accruals. All data and calculations support this date. Staff recommends acceptance of FPL’s requested January 1, 2007, implementation date as the earliest practicable date for utilizing the revised dismantlement accruals.


Issue 3

 Should this docket be closed?

Recommendation

 No.  This docket should remain open, pending final Commission action on FPL’s proposed annual dismantlement accruals.  (Brown)

Staff Analysis

 The recommendation addresses the preliminary booking of FPL’s proposed dismantlement accruals beginning January 1, 2007, with a provision subject to true-up of the resulting expenses when final Commission action is taken.  The issue regarding the appropriate dismantlement provision cannot be resolved until staff has thoroughly reviewed and analyzed the company’s filed study.  Staff expects to bring a recommendation to the Commission for final action on this request in December 2007.  The Order reflecting the Commission’s decision on the final dismantlement provision will be issued as Proposed Agency Action, affording a point of entry for substantially affected persons.


 

                                                                                                            Attachment A

 

FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY

PRELIMINARY IMPLEMENTATION

DISMANTLEMENT ACCRUAL FOR 2007

Plant Site

Current Annual Accrual

Proposed Annual Accrual

Change in Annual Accrual

 

($)

($)

($)

Cape Canaveral

695,862

520,131

(175,731)

Cutler

300,103

286,673

(13,430)

Fort Lauderdale

1,566,221

1,082,262

(483,959)

Fort Myers

1,071,886

1,141,833

69,947

Manatee

2,777,116

2,357,769

(419,347)

Martin

3,642,936

2,607,319

(1,035,617)

Port Everglades

2,342,270

1,938,010

(404,260)

Putnam

392,208

382,623

(9,585)

Riviera

703,713

476,263

(227,450)

Sanford

1,427,946

1,428,622

676

Scherer

1,523,894

1,637,679

113,785

St. Johns River Power Park

960,630

835,972

(124,658)

Turkey Point*

1,269,610

655,725

(613,885)

Total Dismantlement Provision

18,674,395

15,350,881

(3,323,514)

*Annual Accrual for Turkey Point Unit 5  is based upon the company’s request for a half year’s dismantlement accrual for 2007. Turkey Point Unit 5 went into service May 1, 2007.


                                                                                                                                    Attachment B

FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY

PRELIMINARY IMPLEMENTATION

DISMANTLEMENT ACCRUAL FOR 2008 THROUGH 2010

Plant Site

Current Annual Accrual

Proposed Annual Accrual

Change in Annual Accrual

 

($)

($)

($)

Cape Canaveral

695,862

520,131

(175,731)

Cutler

300,103

286,673

(13,430)

Fort Lauderdale

1,566,221

1,082,262

(483,959)

Fort Myers

1,071,886

1,141,833

69,947

Manatee

2,777,116

2,357,769

(419,347)

Martin

3,642,936

2,607,319

(1,035,617)

Port Everglades

2,342,270

1,938,010

(404,260)

Putnam

392,208

382,623

(9,585)

Riviera

703,713

476,263

(227,450)

Sanford

1,427,946

1,428,622

676

Scherer

1,523,894

1,637,679

113,785

St. Johns River Power Park

960,630

835,972

(124,658)

Turkey Point*

1,269,610

854,983

(414,627)

            Total Dismantlement Provision

18,674,395

15,550,139

(3,124,256)

* Annual Accrual for Turkey Point Unit 5 established on a full year basis beginning January 1, 2008 through 2010.



[1] Global Insight is a provider of forecasted information and software to monitor and interpret economic, energy, survey, financial, industry and sector data used in analysis of various markets, industries, securities and strategic consulting.