WARNING:

Changes in appearance and in display of formulas, tables, and text may have occurred during translation of this document into an electronic medium. This HTML document may not be an accurate version of the official document and should not be relied on.

For an official paper copy, contact the Florida Public Service Commission at contact@psc.state.fl.us or call (850) 413-6770. There may be a charge for the copy.

 

 

DATE:

March 26, 2009

TO:

Office of Commission Clerk (Cole)

FROM:

Division of Economic Regulation (Brady, Redemann)

Office of the General Counsel (Klancke)

RE:

Docket No. 080183-WU – Joint application for approval of transfer of Tamiami Village Water Company, Inc.'s water system and Certificate No. 388-W in Lee County to Ni Florida, LLC.

County: Lee

AGENDA:

04/07/09Regular Agenda – Proposed Agency Action for Issues 1 and 2 -- Interested Persons May Participate

COMMISSIONERS ASSIGNED:

All Commissioners

PREHEARING OFFICER:

Edgar

CRITICAL DATES:

None

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:

None

FILE NAME AND LOCATION:

S:\PSC\ECR\WP\080183.RCM.DOC

 

Case Background

Tamiami Village Water Company, Inc. (Tamiami or Utility) is a Class C water utility serving approximately 718 residential and 27 general service customers.  The Utility facilities consist of water distribution lines which deliver water purchased from Lee County pursuant to a bulk service agreement.  Wastewater services are provided by North Fort Myers Utility, Inc.  The Utility is located in the South Florida Water Management District where, due to drought related conditions, irrigation water use is restricted to twice a week.  The Utility’s 2007 annual report shows total operating revenues of $208,744 and net a operating loss of $4,900.

The Utility was granted Certificate No. 388-W in 1983.[1]  The Utility has also had two prior transfers[2] and an amendment.[3]

On March 31, 2008, Tamiami and Ni Florida, LLC (Ni Florida) filed a joint application in this docket for the transfer of Tamiami’s facilities and certificate to Ni Florida.  On September 24, 2008, the Commission issued Order No. PSC-08-0621-FOF-WU approving the transfer of Tamiami’s water system and Certificate No. 388-W to Ni Florida.  An amendatory order was issued on October 7, 2008.  The transfer of the water facilities occurred on September 10, 2008, immediately following the Commission’s vote on the transfer.  Since rate base was last established in 1995 pursuant to the transfer in Order No. PSC-95-1441-FOF-WU, it was decided that rate base should be updated with the change in ownership.  Therefore, an audit was conducted to establish rate base as of December 31, 2007.

In addition, in Order No. PSC-08-0621-FOF-WU approving the transfer, the Commission required that Ni Florida file an updated territory map within six months from the date of the closing to determine whether the Utility may be serving outside its authorized territory.  While the Utility is in the process of complying with this requirement, the maps provided are not yet sufficient to meet the requirement of the order.  Therefore, the docket should remain open pending staff verification that the updated territory map meets the requirements of PSC-08-0621-FOF-WU.

This recommendation addresses rate base and acquisition adjustment for the transfer of the water facilities and Certificate No. 388-W from Tamiami to Ni Florida.  The Commission has jurisdiction to consider this matter pursuant to Section 367.071, Florida Statutes (F.S.).


Discussion of Issues

Issue 1

 What is water rate base for the transfer of Tamiami Village Water Company, Inc.?

Recommendation

 The appropriate rate base for transfer purposes for Tamiami’s water system is $66,842 as of December 31, 2007.  Within 60 days of the date of the final order, Ni Florida should be required to provide a statement that the Utility’s books have been updated to reflect the Commission-approved rate base adjustments and balances.  In addition, the Commission approved rate base adjustments should be reflected in the Utility’s 2009 annual report.  (Brady, Redemann)

Staff AnalysisRate base was last set for the Utility on December 31, 1994, by Order No. PSC-95-1441-FOF-WU.  Therefore an audit was conducted to establish rate base as of December 31, 2007, and to determine the extent to which the Utility books and records conform with the 1996 National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners’ (NARUC’s) Uniform System of Accounts (USOA).  The audit determined that the Utility was not using NARUC’s USOA account numbers.  However, audit staff was able to convert the Utility’s account numbers to NARUC account numbers with no effect on the general ledger.  Staff’s recommendations for rate base are discussed below.  Staff notes that rate base for transfer purposes does not include the normal rate-making adjustments for working capital or used and useful plant.

Utility Plant in Service (UPIS).  The Utility’s books reflected a December 31, 2007 balance for UPIS of $280,923, which includes the cost of transmission and distribution mains, services, meters and meter installation, and office furniture and equipment.  According to the audit, the Utility did not appropriately record retirements when it added new plant to replace existing plant.  Audit staff used 75 percent of the cost of the new equipment for the value of retired equipment, which is a reasonable estimate of original costs.[4]  The total audit adjustment for retirements is ($6,344).  There was also no supporting documentation for some of the journal entries.  The total audit adjustment for unsupported plant was ($1,411).  Therefore, staff recommends that UPIS should be decreased by ($7,755) to reflect adjustments for retirement and to remove unsupported plant.  Staff, therefore, recommends that the UPIS balance for Tamiami’s water system was $273,168 as of December 31, 2007, as shown on Schedule No. 1.  The adjustments to UPIS are shown on Schedule No. 2.  Staff’s recommended balances for UPIS by NARUC USOA are shown on Schedule No. 3.

            Accumulated Depreciation.  The Utility’s books reflected a December 31, 2007,, balance for accumulated depreciation of ($193,933).  According to the audit, there were errors in applying depreciation rates as well as plant retirements that were not properly booked.  Staff recommends that, consistent with the guidelines for depreciation set by Rule 25-30.140, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), the accumulated depreciation balance for Tamiami was ($195,859) as of December 31, 2007, as shown on Schedule No. 1.  The adjustments to accumulated depreciation are shown on Schedule No. 2.  Staff’s recommended balances for accumulated depreciation by NARUC USOA are shown on Schedule No. 3.

 

            Contributions-in-aid-of-Construction (CIAC).  The Utility’s books reflected a December 31, 2007, CIAC balance of ($110,779).  Tamiami is built out and, therefore, currently has no approved service availability charges.  The amount of CIAC last established for Tamiami was ($103,713) as of December 31, 1994, pursuant to the rate base authorized in Order No. PSC-95-1441-FOF-WU.  However, during the intervening years, some customers did not cash their reimbursements for deposits and cash advances in the amount of ($3,911).  In addition, the water treatment provider, Lee County, returned ($3,155) associated with errors in tap-in fees.  The total adjustment to CIAC should be ($7,066).  Therefore, staff recommends that the CIAC balance was ($110,779) as of December 31, 2007, as shown on Schedule No. 1.

 

            Accumulated Amortization of CIAC.  The Utility’s books reflected a December 31, 2007 accumulated amortization of CIAC balance of $106,267.  According to the audit, the Utility used 5.9 percent on CIAC additions from 1995 through 2007 and 3.31 percent for prior years.  Audit staff used a yearly composite rate pursuant to NARUC’s USOA for a Class C utility.  The composite rate is based on the guideline average service lives in Rule 25-30.140, F.A.C.  Staff recommends that accumulated amortization of CIAC be adjusted by ($5,955) to comport with the rule.  Therefore, staff recommends that the balance for accumulated amortization of CIAC was $100,312 as of December 31, 2007, as shown on Schedule No. 1.

 

            Conclusion.  Based on the foregoing, staff recommends that the appropriate rate base for transfer purposes for Tamiami’s water system is $66,842 as of December 31, 2007.  Rate base is shown on Schedule No. 1 and adjustments to rate base are shown on Schedule No. 2.  Staff’s recommended balances by NARUC USOA for UPIS and accumulated depreciation are shown on Schedule No. 3.  Within 60 days of the date of the final order, Ni Florida should be required to provide a statement that the Utility’s books have been updated to reflect the Commission-approved rate base adjustments and balances.  In addition, the Commission approved rate base adjustments should be reflected in the Utility’s 2009 annual report.


Issue 2

 Should an acquisition adjustment be approved?

Recommendation

 No.  An acquisition adjustment should not be included in the calculation of rate base for transfer purposes.  (Brady)

Staff Analysis

 An acquisition adjustment results when the purchase price differs from the original cost of the assets adjusted to the time of the acquisition.  The calculation of the acquisition adjustment is shown below:

Purchase Price                                                           $745,000

Rate Base                                                                  $  66,842

Positive Acquisition Adjustment                                  $678,158

Pursuant to Rule 25-30.0371, F.A.C., a positive acquisition adjustment shall not be included in rate base absent proof of extraordinary circumstances.  The buyer has neither requested an acquisition adjustment nor identified any extraordinary circumstances.  Therefore, staff recommends that an acquisition adjustment should not be included in the calculation of rate base for transfer purposes.

 


Issue 3

 Should this docket be closed?

Recommendation

 No.  If no protest to the proposed agency action issues is filed by a substantially affected person within 21 days of the date of the order, a consummating order should be issued.  However, the docket should remain open pending receipt of the confirmation statement that the Utility’s books have been adjusted to reflect the Commission-approved rate base adjustments and verification of an updated territory map.  Upon receipt of the statement and updated territory map, the docket should be administratively closed.  (Klancke)

Staff Analysis

 If no protest to the proposed agency action issues is filed by a substantially affected person within 21 days of the date of the order, a consummating order should be issued.  However, the docket should remain open pending receipt of the confirmation statement that the Utility’s books have been adjusted to reflect the Commission-approved rate base adjustments and verification of an updated territory map.  Upon receipt of the statement and updated territory map, the docket should be administratively closed.


TAMIAMI VILLAGE WATER COMPANY, INC.

 

 

 

Schedule No. 1

 

Schedule of Water Rate Base

As of December 31, 2007

 

                                                   Balance Per                     Staff’s                  Balance

Description                                Utility Books              Adjustments             Per Staff

 

Utility Plant in Service                      $280,923                      $(7,755)       A        $273,168 

Accumulated Depreciation               (193,933)                      (1,926)       B         (195,859)

Contributions in Aid of

Construction (CIAC)                       (110,779)                               0                   (110,779)

 

Amortization of CIAC                       106,267                        (5,955)       C          100,312 

Water Rate Base                           $82,478                    $(15,636)                    $66,842 

 

 

 

Schedule No. 2

.

Schedule of Water Rate Base Adjustments

                                                                                                      Staff Recommended

Explanation                                                                                        Adjustments

A  Utility Plant In Service

1.  To properly record UPIS retirements                                          $(6,344)

2.  To remove unsupported plant                                                        (1,411)

Total Utility Plant In Service adjustment                                             (7,755)

B  Accumulated Depreciation

1.  To reflect correct depreciation rates and

     adjustments for retired plant                                                        $(1,926) 

Total Accumulated Depreciation adjustment                                     $(1,926) 

C  Accumulated Amortization of CIAC                                                       

1.  To decrease amortization to reflect composite rates  $(5,955) 

Total Accumulated Amortization of CIAC adjustment    $(5,955) 

Total Adjustments                                                                       $15,636 

Schedule No. 3

 

Staff Recommended Water Account Balances For

Utility Plant in Service and Accumulated Depreciation

As of December 31, 2007

 

 

 

 

ACCUMULATED

Account

 

UPIS

DEPRECIATION

Number

Account Name

BALANCE

BALANCE

331

Transmission and Distribution Mains

174,568

(105,308)

333

Services

50,932

(  42,883)

334

Meters and Meter Installations

36,458

(  36,458)

340

Office Furniture and Equipment

11,210

(  11,210)

 

Totals

$273,168

$(195,859)

 

 



[1] Order No. 11734, issued March 18, 1983, in Docket No. 820183-WS (MC), In Re:  Application of Tamiami Utility Company for an original certificate to operate a water and sewer utility in Lee County, Florida.

[2] Order No. 21421, issued June 20, 1989, in Docket No. 890127-WS, In Re: Joint application for transfer of Certificates Nos. 388-W and 332-S from Tamiami Utility Company in Lee County to Tamiami Village Utility, Inc.; Order No. PSC-95-1441-FOF-WU, issued November 28, 1995, in Docket No. 950015-WU, In Re:  Application for transfer of Certificate No. 388-W in Lee County from Tamiami Village Utility, Inc.; and for a limited proceeding to increase rates to recover increased operation and maintenance expenses as a result of pending transfer by Tamiami Village Water Company, Inc.

[3] Order No. 22449, issued January 23, 1990, in Docket No. 891148-WS, In Re:  Application of Tamiami Village Utility, Inc. for amendment of Certificates 388-W and 332-S in Lee County.

[4] The Commission found, where original cost is not available for retirements, that 75 percent of replacement cost was a reasonable estimate for the cost of the retirement.  This practice of determining plant costs is consistent with Order No. PSC-03-1250-PAA-WU, issued November 6, 2003, in Docket No. 030250-WU, In Re: Application for a staff-assisted rate case in Pasco County by Floralino Properties, Inc.; in Order No. PSC-01-1574-PAA-WS, issued July 30, 2001, in Docket No. 000584-WS, In Re:  Application for a staff-assisted rate case in Martin County by Laniger Enterprises of America, Inc.; and in Order No. PSC-09-0017-PAA-SU, issued January 5, 2009, in Docket No. 070740-SU, In Re:  Joint application for approval of transfer of Hudson Utilities, Inc.’s wastewater system and Certificate No. 104-S, in Pasco County, to Ni Florida, LLC.