Changes in appearance and in display of formulas, tables, and text may have occurred during translation of this document into an electronic medium. This HTML document may not be an accurate version of the official document and should not be relied on.
For an official paper copy, contact the Florida Public Service Commission at contact@psc.state.fl.us or call (850) 413-6770. There may be a charge for the copy.
|
|
|
||
|
DATE: |
|||
|
TO: |
Office of Commission Clerk (Cole) |
||
|
FROM: |
Division of Regulatory Analysis (Ballinger, Futrell, Harlow) Office of the General Counsel (Fleming, Sayler) |
||
|
RE: |
Docket No. 080407-EG – Commission review of numeric conservation goals (Florida Power & Light Company).
Docket No. 080408-EG – Commission review of numeric conservation goals (Progress Energy Florida, Inc.).
Docket No. 080409-EG – Commission review of numeric conservation goals (Tampa Electric Company).
Docket No. 080410-EG – Commission review of numeric conservation goals (Gulf Power Company).
Docket No. 080411-EG – Commission review of numeric conservation goals (Florida Public Utilities Company).
Docket No. 080412-EG – Commission review of numeric conservation goals (Orlando Utilities Commission).
Docket No. 080413-EG – Commission review of numeric conservation goals (JEA). |
||
|
AGENDA: |
12/01/09 – Regular Agenda – Post-Hearing Decision – Participation is Limited to Commissioners and Staff |
||
|
COMMISSIONERS ASSIGNED: |
|||
|
PREHEARING OFFICER: |
|||
|
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: |
Supplemental Recommendation to Staff's October 15, 2009, Recommendation |
||
|
FILE NAME AND LOCATION: |
S:\PSC\RAD\WP\080407.RCM.DOC |
||
At the November 10, 2009, Agenda Conference, the Commission directed staff to review Issues 2, 9, 10, and 11 to develop alternative DSM goals for each utility that are more robust. Staff has reviewed the record in this proceeding and is providing a supplemental recommendation with the documentation and rationale for selecting more aggressive DSM goals for each FEECA utility.
The overall charge for the Commission is to establish annual demand and energy goals for each FEECA utility for the next ten years. Therefore, staff would suggest that if the Commission decides to adopt this supplemental recommendation for establishing goals for the FEECA utilities, that the Commission vote on Issues 9, 10, and 15 before addressing the other issues in staff’s October 15, 2009, recommendation. Pursuant to Rule 25-17.0021(2), F.A.C., the Commission may initiate a proceeding to modify the goals either on its own motion, by petition of a substantially affected person, or by a petition from a utility.
The Commission has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Sections 366.80 through 366.82, Florida Statutes (F.S.)
The goals proposed by each utility rely upon the E-RIM Test. Staff’s October 15, 2009, recommendation proposed rejecting the goals proposed by all utilities for various reasons. The goals contained in staff’s October 15, 2009, recommendation were above E-RIM for FPL, FPUC, OUC, and JEA but below E-RIM values for PEF, TECO, and Gulf. At the November 10, 2009, Agenda Conference, the Commission directed staff to develop alternative DSM goals for each utility that are more robust than what each utility proposed. Staff has reviewed the record in this proceeding and recommends that the Commission approve goals based on the unconstrained E-TRC Test for FPL, PEF, TECO, Gulf, and FPUC. The unconstrained E-TRC test is cost-effective, from a system basis, and does not limit the amount of energy efficiency based on resource reliability needs. The E-TRC test includes cost estimates for future greenhouse gas emissions, but does not include utility lost revenues or customer incentive payments. As such, the E-TRC values are higher than the utility proposed E-RIM values. OUC, and JEA proposed goals of zero yet committed to continue their current DSM program offerings. Staff’s recommendation is to set goals for OUC and JEA based on their current programs so as not to unduly increase rates.
Numeric Goals (Issues 9 and 10 from 10/15/09 recommendation)
Attachment 1 contains the full range of options available to the Commission. Also included in Attachment 1 are estimates of the lost revenue impact in both basis points and total dollars for each alternative. Attachment 2 contains the annual residential and commercial/industrial goals for each utility based on the supplemental recommendation. A comparison of each utility’s ten year (2019) proposed goal, staff’s October 15, 2009, recommendation, and staff’s supplemental recommendation for summer demand, winter demand, and annual energy savings goals is summarized below.
|
2019 Summer Demand Goals (MW) |
|||
|
|
Utility Proposal (E-RIM)
|
Staff (10/15) (2009 TYSP) |
Staff Supplement (E-TRC) |
|
FPL |
607 |
1,185 |
1,073 |
|
PEF |
521 |
430 |
744 |
|
TECO |
82 |
98 |
119 |
|
Gulf |
69 |
84 |
88 |
|
FPUC |
0 |
2 |
4 |
|
OUC |
0 |
12 |
12 |
|
JEA |
0 |
44 |
44 |
2019 Winter Demand Goals (MW) |
|||
|
|
Utility Proposal (E-RIM)
|
Staff (10/15) (2009 TYSP) |
Staff Supplement (E-TRC) |
|
FPL |
338 |
785 |
482 |
|
PEF |
560 |
687 |
882 |
|
TECO |
41 |
103 |
73 |
|
46 |
185 |
70 |
|
|
FPUC |
0 |
3 |
2 |
|
OUC |
0 |
9 |
9 |
|
JEA |
0 |
30 |
30 |
2019 Annual Energy Goals (GWH) |
|||
|
|
Utility Proposal (E-RIM)
|
Staff (10/15) (2009 TYSP) |
Staff Supplement (E-TRC) |
|
FPL |
878 |
1,549 |
2,177 |
|
PEF |
614 |
452 |
1,585 |
|
TECO |
202 |
121 |
310 |
|
Gulf |
159 |
158 |
252 |
|
FPUC |
0 |
6 |
13 |
|
OUC |
0 |
36 |
36 |
|
JEA |
0 |
290 |
290 |
Goals based on the E-TRC Test include the effect of each utility’s estimates of future carbon costs which tends to increase the number of energy saving measures that would be cost-effective. As discussed in Issue 5 of staff’s October 15, 2009, recommendation, the values assumed for future carbon costs are not required pursuant to Section 366.82(3)(d), F.S., because green house gas emission legislation has not been adopted by either Congress or the Florida Legislature. In addition, utility cost estimates vary by over 100 percent among the four large investor-owned utilities. The E-TRC Test also includes the equipment and administrative costs associated with the program, but does not include utility incentive payments which must be recovered from the general body of ratepayers through the ECCR clause. While moving from an E-RIM to an E-TRC Test is cost-effective from a system wide analysis, such a policy decision may result in subsidization by non-participating customers. Any increase in the amount of DSM programs offered by utilities will result in immediate increases in rates to all customers through the ECCR clause when additional customer incentives are included. In addition, the lost revenues associated with additional energy efficiency measures would increase the potential for base rate increases in the near future. The record in this proceeding indicates that the majority of measures that passed the E-TRC Test but failed the E-RIM Test were commercial/industrial measures suggesting that residential customers may be subsidizing commercial/industrial customers. If the Commission establishes goals based on the E-TRC Test, then utilities should be directed to file a mix of residential and commercial/industrial programs that would minimize this subsidization.
FPL proposed goals that were constrained at the utility’s resource needs over the ten-year analysis period. Therefore, FPL’s proposed E-RIM and E-TRC values are the same. Staff is recommending an unconstrained E-TRC value which, while cost-effective on a system basis, may result in FPL delaying the construction of some natural gas-fired power plants that have already been certified and may be under construction. The cost of delaying the construction of these units was not included in any analysis provided in this proceeding. The unconstrained goal should not materially affect the timing of the Turkey Point nuclear units since their in-service dates are 2018 and 2020.
Two-Year Payback (Issues 2, 9, and 10 from 10/15/09 recommendation)
As discussed in Issues 2 and 9 of the October 15, 2009, recommendation, staff believes that the most cost-effective way to capture savings associated with measures that have a two-year pay-back is through expanded education programs. At the November 10, 2009, Agenda Conference, staff was directed to evaluate the feasibility of including such measures as part of the utilities’ numeric goals. If the Commission desires to include additional measures that have a quick customer pay-back, staff would propose two alternatives in addition to the unconstrained E-TRC recommendation above.
As shown in Attachment 1, the top ten measures with a two-year or less pay-back are a mix of residential and commercial measures. Such measures are ranked in terms of energy savings.
1) The first option would be to include only the residential measures which include compact fluorescent lighting, proper refrigerant charging for A/C systems, proper sizing of A/C systems, duct sealing, efficient pool pump motors, and window tinting. Such an option would be consistent with witness Spellman’s recommendation to include only residential free riders and would mitigate some cost shifting.
2) The second option would be to include the total top ten list of residential and commercial/industrial measures. If the Commission decides to include such measures, staff would recommend that annual values be calculated as equal increments since only cumulative values were included in the record.
Utility Incentives (Issue 6 from 10/15/09 recommendation)
Section 366.82(9), F.S., states:
The Commission is authorized to allow an investor-owned electric utility an additional return on equity of up to 50 basis points for exceeding 20 percent of their annual load-growth through energy efficiency and conservation measures. The additional return on equity shall be established by the commission through a limited proceeding.
As discussed in Issue 6 of staff’s October 15, 2009, recommendation, all parties agreed that any additional utility incentives should be addressed in a limited scope proceeding as provided for in Section 366.82(9), F.S. As such, there are no specific incentive mechanism proposals included in the record of this proceeding.
While not specifically discussed as an option at the hearing, staff has included such values in accordance with the above mentioned Statute, where available, as part of Attachment 1 for comparative purposes. The calculations are based on load growth estimates as of January 1, 2009, which are contained in each utility’s Ten-Year Site Plan.
Solar Programs (Issue 11 from 10/15 recommendation)
At the November 10, 2009, Agenda Conference, the Commission discussed whether to establish separate goals for demand-side renewable systems pursuant to Issue 11 of staff’s October 15, 2009, recommendation. The utilities and FIPUG state that a goal should not be established as demand-side renewable measures are not cost-effective under any of the three cost-effectiveness tests. The Florida Solar Coalition (FSC) and staff recommend the Commission can meet the requirements of Section 366.82(2), F.S., by requiring the utilities to establish programs focusing on solar energy systems.
In the October 15, 2009, recommendation staff recommends the Commission authorize the investor-owned utilities to spend up to 5 percent of historic ECCR expenditures as an annual cap for solar water heating and solar photovoltaic pilot programs. This level of expenditures by the IOUs, approximately $12 million per year, would closely match the 2009/2010 funding level established by the Legislature for the solar rebate program administered by the Florida Energy and Climate Commission (FECC). If in the future the FECC program is maintained at the current budget level, the IOU programs will result in an increase in solar installations and market development. If funding for the FECC program is reduced, the IOU programs at a minimum will maintain the momentum for solar established by the FECC program. The level of funding recommended by staff provides a balance between the Legislature’s intent to promote renewable technologies while minimizing the impact to customers’ rates.
The Commission has the latitude to select an amount above or below staff’s recommendation. If the Commission wishes to ensure an increase in funding for solar in the state, the Commission would need to select an amount above staff’s recommendation, such as the 10 percent ECCR expenditure level suggested by GDS Associates.
The values from the table that was included on page 73 of staff’s October 15, 2009, recommendation are shown below:
|
Utility |
GDS Annual Expenses |
GDS Bill Impact ($/month) (10%) |
FSC Annual Expenses |
FSC Bill Impact ($/month) |
Staff Recommended Annual Expenses (5%) |
Staff Bill Impact ($/month) |
|
FPL |
$15,536,870 |
$0.18 |
$113,000,000 |
$1.28 |
$7,768,435 |
$0.09 |
|
Gulf |
$900,338 |
$0.09 |
$10,800,000 |
$1.09 |
$450,169 |
$0.05 |
|
PEF |
$6,467,592 |
$0.19 |
$40,000,000 |
$1.18 |
$3,233,796 |
$0.10 |
|
TECO |
$1,531,018 |
$0.10 |
$19,800,000 |
$1.28 |
$765,509 |
$0.05 |
|
FPUC |
$47,233 |
$0.07 |
$0 |
$0.00 |
$23,616 |
$0.04 |
|
Total |
$24,483,051 |
|
$183,600,000 |
|
$12,241,525 |
|
GDS = PSC Staff witness
FSC = Florida Solar Coalition
Attachment 1 contains a range of options for the Commission to consider, including the positions of the intervenors. Below are some descriptions of the column headings:
RIM – Savings based on Rate Impact Measure test (calculated by staff)
TRC – Savings based on total Resource Cost test (calculated by staff)
E-RIM - Savings based on Rate Impact Measure test including estimated cost of carbon emissions (utility proposal)
E-TRC - Savings based on Total Resource Cost test including estimated cost of carbon emissions (provided by utility)
E-TRC + Top 10 Res - Savings based on Total Resource Cost test including estimated cost of carbon emissions (provided by utility) + estimates of top ten residential free rider measures (calculated by staff)
E-TRC + Top 10 Total - Savings based on Total Resource Cost test including estimated cost of carbon emissions (provided by utility) + estimates of total top ten residential and commercial/industrial free rider measures (calculated by staff)
FSC – Goals proposed by Florida Solar Coalition
NRDC – Goals proposed by NRDC/SACE
20 percent load Growth – Value shown for comparative purposes (calculated by staff)
|
FPL TOTAL DSM GOALS (unconstrained by resource needs) |
|||||||||
|
|
RIM |
TRC |
E-RIM |
E-TRC |
E-TRC + (Top 10 Res.) |
E-TRC + (Top 10 Total) |
FSC |
NRDC |
20% Load Growth |
|
SUM. (MW) |
N/A |
N/A |
888 |
1,073 |
1,498 |
1,806 |
2,716 |
2,460 |
884 |
|
WIN. (MW) |
N/A |
N/A |
344 |
482 |
605 |
753 |
1,373 |
2,197 |
598 |
|
ENERGY (GWH) |
N/A |
N/A |
1,700 |
2,177 |
3,082 |
4,733 |
4,233 |
10,797 |
4,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE IMPACT (Basis points) |
N/A |
N/A |
76 |
98 |
138 |
212 |
190 |
484 |
220 |
|
REVENUE IMPACT ($ millions) |
N/A |
N/A |
99 |
127 |
180 |
276 |
246 |
629 |
285 |
|
FPL Top Ten Free Riders Based on Energy Savings (EXH 4) |
||||
|
Customer Type |
Measure Name |
Summer Demand (MW) |
Winter Demand (MW) |
Annual Energy (GWH) |
|
Residential |
Proper refrigerant charging and air flow |
156 |
0 |
377 |
|
Residential |
Electronically commutated motors on Air Handlers |
87 |
136 |
249 |
|
Residential |
Default window with sunscreen |
137 |
-13 |
170 |
|
Residential |
Proper refrigerant charging and air flow |
45 |
0 |
109 |
|
SUBTOTAL |
|
425 |
123 |
905 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
CFL Screw-in 18W |
111 |
63 |
602 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
Premium T8, Electronic Ballast |
73 |
48 |
407 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
CFL Hardwired, Modular 18 W |
37 |
21 |
201 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
Aerosole Duct Sealing- GSD/GSLD |
30 |
0 |
154 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
Aerosole Duct Sealing- GS |
32 |
0 |
150 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
Premium T8, EB, reflector |
25 |
16 |
137 |
|
TOTAL |
|
733 |
271 |
2,556 |
|
FPL TOTAL DSM GOALS (constrained by resource needs) |
|||||||||
|
|
RIM |
TRC |
E-RIM |
E-TRC |
E-TRC + (Top 10 Res.) |
E-TRC + (Top 10 Total) |
FSC |
NRDC |
20% Load Growth |
|
SUM. (MW) |
547 |
599 |
607 |
607 |
1,032 |
1,340 |
2,716 |
2,460 |
884 |
|
WIN. (MW) |
N/A |
N/A |
338 |
338 |
461 |
609 |
1,373 |
2,197 |
598 |
|
ENERGY (GWH) |
695 |
863 |
878 |
878 |
1,783 |
3,434 |
4,233 |
10,797 |
4,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE IMPACT (Basis points) |
31 |
39 |
39 |
39 |
80 |
154 |
190 |
484 |
220 |
|
REVENUE IMPACT ($ millions) |
41 |
50 |
51 |
51 |
104 |
200 |
250 |
630 |
285 |
|
FPL Top Ten Free Riders Based on Energy Savings (EXH 4) |
||||
|
Customer Type |
Measure Name |
Summer Demand (MW) |
Winter Demand (MW) |
Annual Energy (GWH) |
|
Residential |
Proper refrigerant charging and air flow |
156 |
0 |
377 |
|
Residential |
Electronically commutated motors on Air Handlers |
87 |
136 |
249 |
|
Residential |
Default window with sunscreen |
137 |
-13 |
170 |
|
Residential |
Proper refrigerant charging and air flow |
45 |
0 |
109 |
|
SUBTOTAL |
|
425 |
123 |
905 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
CFL Screw-in 18W |
111 |
63 |
602 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
Premium T8, Electronic Ballast |
73 |
48 |
407 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
CFL Hardwired, Modular 18 W |
37 |
21 |
201 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
Aerosole Duct Sealing- GSD/GSLD |
30 |
0 |
154 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
Aerosole Duct Sealing- GS |
32 |
0 |
150 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
Premium T8, EB, reflector |
25 |
16 |
137 |
|
TOTAL |
|
733 |
271 |
2,556 |
|
PEF TOTAL DSM GOALS |
|||||||||
|
|
RIM |
TRC |
E-RIM |
E-TRC |
E-TRC + (Top 10 Res.) |
E-TRC + (Top 10 Total) |
FSC |
NRDC |
20% Load Growth |
|
SUM. (MW) |
359 |
726 |
521 |
744 |
1,183 |
1,308 |
1,047 |
1,431 |
391 |
|
WIN. (MW) |
453 |
833 |
560 |
882 |
1,072 |
1,143 |
1,097 |
1,318 |
390 |
|
ENERGY (GWH) |
422 |
1,495 |
614 |
1,585 |
3,488 |
4,133 |
3,498 |
3,772 |
1,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE IMPACT (Basis points) |
47 |
167 |
69 |
178 |
391 |
463 |
392 |
422 |
191 |
|
REVENUE IMPACT ($ millions) |
25 |
87 |
36 |
92 |
203 |
241 |
204 |
220 |
99 |
|
PEF Top Ten Free Riders Based on Energy Savings (EXH 4) |
||||
|
Customer Type |
Measure Name |
Summer Demand (MW) |
Winter Demand (MW) |
Annual Energy (GWH) |
|
Residential |
CFL (18-watt integral ballast) |
36 |
51 |
681 |
|
Residential |
High efficiency one speed pool pump |
45 |
9 |
212 |
|
Residential |
Two speed pool pump |
45 |
9 |
210 |
|
Residential |
Proper refrigerant charging and air flow |
77 |
0 |
202 |
|
Residential |
Electronically commutated motors on Air Handlers |
58 |
110 |
182 |
|
Residential |
Default window with sunscreen |
121 |
-18 |
161 |
|
Residential |
Water heater blanket |
10 |
29 |
133 |
|
Residential |
A/C maintenance (outdoor coil cleaning) |
47 |
0 |
122 |
|
SUBTOTAL |
|
439 |
190 |
1903 |
|
Commercial |
CFL screw-in 18 watt |
78 |
43 |
402 |
|
Commercial |
Premium T8, electronic ballast |
47 |
28 |
243 |
|
TOTAL |
|
564 |
261 |
2548 |
|
TECO TOTAL DSM GOALS |
|||||||||
|
|
RIM |
TRC |
E-RIM |
E-TRC |
E-TRC + (Top 10 Res.) |
E-TRC + (Top 10 Total) |
FSC |
NRDC |
20% Load Growth |
|
SUM. (MW) |
25 |
89 |
82 |
119 |
138 |
183 |
464 |
485 |
156 |
|
WIN. (MW) |
21 |
66 |
41 |
73 |
109 |
125 |
308 |
524 |
166 |
|
ENERGY (GWH) |
105 |
253 |
202 |
310 |
360 |
603 |
1,292 |
2,022 |
724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE IMPACT (Basis points) |
23 |
55 |
44 |
67 |
78 |
130 |
279 |
436 |
156 |
|
REVENUE IMPACT ($ millions) |
6 |
15 |
12 |
18 |
21 |
35 |
75 |
118 |
42 |
|
TECO Top Ten Free Riders Based on Energy Savings (EXH 4) |
||||
|
Customer Type |
Measure Name |
Summer Demand (MW) |
Winter Demand (MW) |
Annual Energy (GWH) |
|
Residential |
Electronically commutated motors on Air Handlers |
19 |
36 |
50 |
|
SUBTOTAL |
|
19 |
36 |
50 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
Premium T8, electronic ballast |
8 |
5 |
43 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
Separate makeup air exhaust hood |
5 |
1 |
35 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
Premium T8, electronic ballast |
6 |
3 |
33 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
Premium T8, electronic ballast |
7 |
3 |
33 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
Aerosole Duct Sealing |
5 |
0 |
24 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
Heat recovery unit |
3 |
1 |
20 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
PSMH, 250W, magnetic ballast |
4 |
2 |
19 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
Aerosole Duct Sealing |
4 |
0 |
18 |
|
Commercial/Industrial |
PSMH, 250W, magnetic ballast |
3 |
1 |
18 |
|
TOTAL |
|
64 |
52 |
293 |
|
Gulf TOTAL DSM GOALS |
|||||||||
|
|
RIM |
TRC |
E-RIM |
E-TRC |
E-TRC + (Top 10 Res.) |
E-TRC + (Top 10 Total) |
FSC |
NRDC |
20% Load Growth |
|
SUM. (MW) |
65 |
88 |
69 |
88 |
144 |
157 |
223 |
336 |
147 |
|
WIN. (MW) |
31 |
67 |
46 |
71 |
111 |
119 |
159 |
323 |
166 |
|
ENERGY (GWH) |
105 |
236 |
159 |
252 |
574 |
639 |
892 |
1,357 |
739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE IMPACT (Basis points) |
61 |
137 |
93 |
147 |
334 |
372 |
520 |
790 |
430 |
|
REVENUE IMPACT ($ millions) |
6 |
14 |
9 |
15 |
33 |
37 |
52 |
79 |
43 |
|
Gulf Top Ten Free Riders Based on Energy Savings (EXH 4) |
||||
|
Customer Type |
Measure Name |
Summer Demand (MW) |
Winter Demand (MW) |
Annual Energy (GWH) |
|
Residential |
CFL (18-watt integral ballast) 2.5 hr/day |
5 |
6 |
87 |
|
Residential |
CFL (18-watt integral ballast) 6.0 hr/day |
2 |
3 |
47 |
|
Residential |
Electronically commutated motors on Air Handlers |
13 |
25 |
42 |
|
Residential |
High efficiency one speed pool pump |
8 |
2 |
36 |
|
Residential |
Two speed pool pump |
8 |
2 |
35 |
|
Residential |
CFL (18-watt integral ballast) 2.5 hr/day |
2 |
2 |
29 |
|
Residential |
A/C maintenance (outdoor coil cleaning) |
9 |
0 |
23 |
|
Residential |
Proper refrigerant charging and air flow |
9 |
0 |
23 |
|
SUBTOTAL |
|
56 |
40 |
322 |
|
Commercial |
CFL Screw-in 18W |
7 |
4 |
34 |
|
Commercial |
Premium T8, electronic ballast |
6 |
4 |
31 |
|
TOTAL |
|
69 |
48 |
387 |
|
FPUC TOTAL DSM GOALS |
|||||||||
|
|
RIM |
TRC |
E-RIM |
E-TRC |
E-TRC + (Top 10 Res.) |
E-TRC + (Top 10 Total) |
FSC |
NRDC |
20% Load Growth |
|
SUM. (MW) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
N/A |
N/A |
11 |
0 |
N/A |
|
WIN. (MW) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
N/A |
N/A |
9 |
0 |
N/A |
|
ENERGY (GWH) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
N/A |
N/A |
49 |
0 |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE IMPACT (Basis points) |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
REVENUE IMPACT ($ millions) |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
OUC TOTAL DSM GOALS |
||||||||||
|
|
RIM |
TRC |
E-RIM |
E-TRC |
Staff (10/15) |
E-TRC + (Top 10 Res.) |
E-TRC + (Top 10 Total) |
FSC |
NRDC |
20% Load Growth |
|
SUM. (MW) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
79 |
12 |
N/A |
N/A |
109 |
139 |
N/A |
|
WIN. (MW) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
9 |
N/A |
N/A |
7 |
149 |
N/A |
|
ENERGY (GWH) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
36 |
N/A |
N/A |
351 |
646 |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE IMPACT (Basis points) |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
REVENUE IMPACT ($ millions) |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Note: N/A (Not Available from Record)
|
JEA TOTAL DSM GOALS |
||||||||||
|
|
RIM |
TRC |
E-RIM |
E-TRC |
Staff (10/15) |
E-TRC + (Top 10 Res.) |
E-TRC + (Top 10 Total) |
FSC |
NRDC |
20% Load Growth |
|
SUM. (MW) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
44 |
N/A |
N/A |
254 |
305 |
N/A |
|
WIN. (MW) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
N/A |
N/A |
30 |
306 |
N/A |
|
ENERGY (GWH) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
290 |
N/A |
N/A |
884 |
1,333 |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE IMPACT (Basis points) |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
REVENUE IMPACT ($ millions) |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Note: N/A (Not Available from Record)
Attachment 2 contains each party’s proposed annual goals separated by residential and commercial/industrial customers compared to staff’s October 15, 2009, recommendation and the staff’s November 20, 2009, supplemental recommendation (E-TRC).
|
|
Summer MW |
Winter MW |
Annual GWh |
|||||||||||||||||
|
FPL |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
FPL |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
FPL |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
||||||
|
2010 |
26.6 |
94.8 |
51.0 |
64.0 |
25.2 |
24.6 |
66.2 |
57.0 |
41.0 |
20.9 |
33.1 |
212.0 |
170.0 |
94.0 |
29.1 |
|||||
|
2011 |
26.6 |
95.2 |
105.0 |
68.0 |
37.2 |
24.6 |
66.6 |
119.0 |
49.0 |
30.1 |
33.1 |
213.2 |
347.0 |
98.0 |
55.3 |
|||||
|
2012 |
26.3 |
98.4 |
164.0 |
71.0 |
47.7 |
24.7 |
68.6 |
188.0 |
51.0 |
38.0 |
32.8 |
220.0 |
532.0 |
100.0 |
78.3 |
|||||
|
2013 |
26.2 |
99.7 |
166.0 |
75.0 |
56.0 |
24.7 |
69.7 |
192.0 |
52.0 |
44.0 |
32.7 |
223.2 |
530.0 |
105.0 |
96.2 |
|||||
|
2014 |
26.2 |
110.8 |
200.0 |
79.0 |
61.8 |
24.7 |
77.4 |
225.0 |
54.0 |
47.9 |
32.7 |
247.8 |
534.0 |
108.0 |
109.5 |
|||||
|
2015 |
26.2 |
223.3 |
194.0 |
82.0 |
58.2 |
24.7 |
156.0 |
228.0 |
58.0 |
43.6 |
32.7 |
499.6 |
541.0 |
107.0 |
102.5 |
|||||
|
2016 |
26.2 |
236.6 |
203.0 |
81.0 |
53.4 |
24.7 |
165.2 |
231.0 |
58.0 |
39.0 |
32.7 |
529.4 |
563.0 |
108.0 |
92.9 |
|||||
|
2017 |
26.2 |
245.5 |
213.0 |
82.0 |
48.9 |
24.7 |
171.6 |
240.0 |
58.0 |
34.7 |
32.7 |
549.4 |
580.0 |
108.0 |
83.7 |
|||||
|
2018 |
26.2 |
265.7 |
228.0 |
27.0 |
44.9 |
24.7 |
185.6 |
252.0 |
53.0 |
30.9 |
32.7 |
594.6 |
617.0 |
108.0 |
75.9 |
|||||
|
2019 |
26.6 |
277.3 |
268.0 |
69.9 |
40.8 |
24.6 |
193.7 |
295.0 |
52.7 |
27.1 |
33.1 |
620.3 |
637.0 |
104.0 |
67.0 |
|||||
|
Total |
263.3 |
1747.3 |
1792.0 |
698.9 |
474.0 |
246.7 |
1220.6 |
2027.0 |
526.7 |
356.0 |
328.3 |
3909.5 |
5051.0 |
1040.0 |
790.3 |
|||||
|
E-TRC Source: EXH 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Proposed Commercial/Industrial Conservation Goals for FPL |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Summer MW |
Winter MW |
Annual GWh |
|||||||||||||||||
|
FPL |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
FPL |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
FPL |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
||||||
|
2010 |
33.4 |
52.5 |
19.0 |
58.0 |
42.7 |
8.5 |
8.3 |
5.0 |
48.0 |
8.1 |
41.0 |
175.3 |
162.0 |
49.0 |
84.7 |
|||||
|
2011 |
33.4 |
52.8 |
39.0 |
49.0 |
62.5 |
8.5 |
8.3 |
10.0 |
20.0 |
9.9 |
41.4 |
176.2 |
341.0 |
52.0 |
149.4 |
|||||
|
2012 |
33.7 |
54.5 |
61.0 |
50.0 |
76.3 |
8.5 |
8.6 |
16.0 |
22.0 |
11.6 |
44.2 |
181.8 |
540.0 |
54.0 |
191.5 |
|||||
|
2013 |
33.8 |
55.3 |
62.0 |
51.0 |
81.3 |
8.6 |
8.7 |
16.0 |
22.0 |
13.1 |
45.2 |
184.5 |
554.0 |
58.0 |
202.7 |
|||||
|
2014 |
33.8 |
61.4 |
74.0 |
53.0 |
79.3 |
8.9 |
9.6 |
19.0 |
24.0 |
14.4 |
53.9 |
204.8 |
601.0 |
61.0 |
194.1 |
|||||
|
2015 |
33.8 |
123.7 |
73.0 |
52.0 |
71.5 |
9.0 |
19.5 |
19.0 |
24.0 |
15.1 |
54.6 |
413.0 |
626.0 |
60.0 |
167.5 |
|||||
|
2016 |
34.3 |
131.1 |
75.0 |
53.0 |
60.0 |
9.2 |
20.7 |
19.0 |
25.0 |
15.0 |
59.8 |
437.5 |
666.0 |
61.0 |
134.2 |
|||||
|
2017 |
34.7 |
136.1 |
80.0 |
53.0 |
48.7 |
9.6 |
21.4 |
20.0 |
24.0 |
14.1 |
63.3 |
454.1 |
700.0 |
61.0 |
104.8 |
|||||
|
2018 |
35.8 |
147.3 |
85.0 |
18.0 |
41.3 |
10.1 |
23.2 |
21.0 |
23.0 |
13.2 |
71.2 |
491.5 |
756.0 |
2.0 |
86.9 |
|||||
|
2019 |
36.6 |
153.6 |
100.0 |
48.6 |
35.0 |
10.2 |
24.2 |
25.0 |
25.8 |
12.0 |
75.3 |
512.8 |
800.0 |
50.9 |
71.0 |
|||||
|
Total |
343.3 |
968.3 |
668.0 |
485.6 |
598.7 |
91.1 |
152.5 |
170.0 |
257.8 |
126.3 |
549.9 |
3,231.5 |
5,746.0 |
508.9 |
1,386.7 |
|||||
|
E-TRC Source: EXH 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Proposed Residential Conservation Goals for PEF |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Summer MW |
Winter MW |
Annual GWh |
|||||||||||||||||
|
PEF |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
PEF |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
PEF |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
||||||
|
2010 |
24.6 |
42.2 |
28.0 |
33.0 |
40.6 |
37.7 |
57.4 |
39.0 |
61.0 |
63.7 |
40.2 |
129.3 |
65.0 |
30.0 |
99.6 |
|||||
|
2011 |
25.9 |
42.5 |
58.0 |
36.0 |
42.5 |
41.6 |
57.8 |
82.0 |
60.0 |
69.2 |
42.7 |
130.0 |
135.0 |
30.0 |
105.6 |
|||||
|
2012 |
27.9 |
43.8 |
91.0 |
37.0 |
45.5 |
43.2 |
59.6 |
130.0 |
62.0 |
73.2 |
46.3 |
134.2 |
215.0 |
30.0 |
114.7 |
|||||
|
2013 |
29.3 |
44.4 |
96.0 |
36.0 |
47.5 |
44.3 |
60.5 |
136.0 |
62.0 |
75.9 |
48.8 |
136.1 |
221.0 |
30.0 |
120.7 |
|||||
|
2014 |
30.6 |
49.4 |
196.0 |
34.0 |
49.4 |
45.4 |
67.1 |
128.0 |
61.0 |
78.6 |
51.2 |
151.1 |
225.0 |
30.0 |
126.8 |
|||||
|
2015 |
33.3 |
99.4 |
129.0 |
23.0 |
54.8 |
45.9 |
135.4 |
144.0 |
57.0 |
83.3 |
57.8 |
304.7 |
223.0 |
27.0 |
147.9 |
|||||
|
2016 |
43.3 |
105.4 |
132.0 |
25.0 |
63.3 |
58.5 |
143.4 |
146.0 |
46.0 |
94.1 |
54.9 |
322.8 |
234.0 |
27.0 |
135.8 |
|||||
|
2017 |
42.6 |
109.4 |
137.0 |
21.0 |
62.9 |
58.3 |
148.8 |
154.0 |
44.0 |
93.5 |
54.4 |
335.0 |
255.0 |
26.0 |
129.8 |
|||||
|
2018 |
39.2 |
118.4 |
141.0 |
19.0 |
57.4 |
55.2 |
161.1 |
158.0 |
42.0 |
86.0 |
47.5 |
362.6 |
267.0 |
25.0 |
117.7 |
|||||
|
2019 |
26.1 |
123.5 |
164.0 |
29.0 |
42.9 |
33.1 |
168.1 |
164.0 |
55.0 |
61.5 |
43.9 |
378.3 |
279.0 |
28.0 |
108.6 |
|||||
|
Total |
322.8 |
778.4 |
1172.0 |
293.0 |
506.6 |
463.2 |
1059.2 |
1281.0 |
550.0 |
779.1 |
487.5 |
2384.1 |
2119.0 |
283.0 |
1207.1 |
|||||
|
E-TRC Source: EXH 2, BPS 146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Proposed Commercial/Industrial Conservation Goals for PEF |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Summer MW |
Winter MW |
Annual GWh |
|||||||||||||||||
|
PEF |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
PEF |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
PEF |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
||||||
|
2010 |
8.8 |
14.6 |
8.0 |
22.0 |
13.7 |
4.7 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
29.0 |
5.3 |
10.4 |
60.4 |
52.0 |
18.0 |
31.1 |
|||||
|
2011 |
11.6 |
14.7 |
16.0 |
18.0 |
16.2 |
4.8 |
2.1 |
3.0 |
17.0 |
5.3 |
11.1 |
60.7 |
112.0 |
18.0 |
33.0 |
|||||
|
2012 |
21.5 |
15.1 |
26.0 |
20.0 |
25.5 |
10.8 |
2.1 |
3.0 |
17.0 |
11.4 |
12.0 |
62.7 |
172.0 |
18.0 |
35.9 |
|||||
|
2013 |
22.5 |
15.3 |
27.0 |
18.0 |
25.9 |
10.8 |
2.1 |
4.0 |
17.0 |
11.5 |
12.6 |
63.6 |
183.0 |
18.0 |
37.7 |
|||||
|
2014 |
23.3 |
17.1 |
27.0 |
18.0 |
26.4 |
10.9 |
2.4 |
4.0 |
17.0 |
11.5 |
13.3 |
70.6 |
180.0 |
18.0 |
39.6 |
|||||
|
2015 |
23.5 |
34.4 |
28.0 |
7.0 |
27.6 |
11.0 |
4.8 |
4.0 |
16.0 |
11.7 |
15.0 |
142.3 |
177.0 |
16.0 |
46.2 |
|||||
|
2016 |
24.0 |
36.4 |
29.0 |
7.0 |
27.1 |
10.9 |
5.1 |
4.0 |
6.0 |
11.6 |
14.2 |
150.8 |
177.0 |
16.0 |
42.5 |
|||||
|
2017 |
23.0 |
37.8 |
30.0 |
7.0 |
27.0 |
10.9 |
5.2 |
5.0 |
6.0 |
11.6 |
14.1 |
156.4 |
194.0 |
15.0 |
40.6 |
|||||
|
2018 |
21.5 |
40.9 |
32.0 |
6.0 |
25.7 |
10.8 |
5.7 |
4.0 |
6.0 |
11.4 |
12.3 |
169.4 |
200.0 |
15.0 |
36.8 |
|||||
|
2019 |
18.2 |
42.7 |
36.0 |
14.0 |
22.3 |
10.8 |
6.0 |
5.0 |
6.0 |
11.3 |
11.4 |
176.7 |
206.0 |
17.0 |
34.0 |
|||||
|
Total |
197.8 |
269.0 |
259.0 |
137.0 |
237.3 |
96.4 |
37.5 |
37.0 |
137.0 |
102.6 |
126.3 |
1113.6 |
1653.0 |
169.0 |
377.4 |
|||||
|
E-TRC Source: EXH 2, BPS 146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Proposed Residential Conservation Goals for TECO |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Summer MW |
Winter MW |
Annual GWh |
|||||||||||||||||
|
TECO |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
TECO |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
TECO |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
||||||
|
2010 |
1.4 |
18.1 |
12.0 |
5.0 |
2.7 |
1.2 |
15.4 |
16.0 |
5.0 |
2.8 |
1.9 |
38.4 |
31.0 |
7.0 |
4.8 |
|||||
|
2011 |
2.1 |
18.1 |
25.0 |
5.0 |
4.7 |
1.9 |
15.4 |
33.0 |
6.0 |
4.9 |
3.6 |
38.6 |
64.0 |
8.0 |
9.0 |
|||||
|
2012 |
2.9 |
18.7 |
38.0 |
6.0 |
6.5 |
2.4 |
16.0 |
50.0 |
7.0 |
6.6 |
5.0 |
39.8 |
100.0 |
7.0 |
12.7 |
|||||
|
2013 |
3.5 |
19.0 |
39.0 |
6.0 |
8.0 |
3.0 |
16.2 |
52.0 |
7.0 |
7.9 |
6.3 |
40.4 |
104.0 |
7.0 |
15.6 |
|||||
|
2014 |
4.0 |
21.1 |
41.0 |
6.0 |
8.9 |
3.5 |
18.0 |
53.0 |
8.0 |
8.6 |
7.2 |
44.8 |
110.0 |
7.0 |
17.6 |
|||||
|
2015 |
4.3 |
42.6 |
43.0 |
7.0 |
9.0 |
3.5 |
36.2 |
57.0 |
7.0 |
8.0 |
7.7 |
90.4 |
115.0 |
7.0 |
18.0 |
|||||
|
2016 |
4.3 |
45.0 |
44.0 |
5.0 |
7.9 |
3.7 |
38.4 |
58.0 |
7.0 |
6.5 |
7.9 |
95.9 |
121.0 |
6.0 |
16.3 |
|||||
|
2017 |
3.9 |
46.8 |
43.0 |
7.0 |
7.1 |
3.4 |
39.8 |
61.0 |
7.0 |
5.2 |
7.2 |
99.4 |
128.0 |
6.0 |
14.4 |
|||||
|
2018 |
3.7 |
50.6 |
48.0 |
5.0 |
6.4 |
3.1 |
43.1 |
57.0 |
7.0 |
4.4 |
6.5 |
107.6 |
134.0 |
7.0 |
13.3 |
|||||
|
2019 |
3.2 |
52.8 |
50.0 |
5.0 |
5.9 |
2.8 |
45.0 |
58.0 |
7.0 |
3.8 |
5.7 |
112.3 |
141.0 |
7.0 |
12.3 |
|||||
|
Total |
33.3 |
332.8 |
383.0 |
57.0 |
67.1 |
28.5 |
283.5 |
495.0 |
68.0 |
58.7 |
59.0 |
707.6 |
1048.0 |
69.0 |
134.0 |
|||||
|
E-TRC Source: EXH 2, BPS 246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Proposed Commercial/Industrial Conservation Goals for TECO |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Summer MW |
Winter MW |
Annual GWh |
|||||||||||||||||
|
TECO |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
TECO |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
TECO |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
||||||
|
2010 |
2.7 |
7.1 |
3.0 |
6.0 |
2.5 |
0.9 |
1.3 |
1.0 |
5.0 |
0.9 |
6.3 |
31.7 |
31.0 |
7.0 |
6.5 |
|||||
|
2011 |
3.9 |
7.2 |
7.0 |
6.0 |
3.6 |
1.0 |
1.4 |
2.0 |
5.0 |
1.1 |
9.8 |
31.9 |
63.0 |
7.0 |
10.6 |
|||||
|
2012 |
4.3 |
7.4 |
10.0 |
6.0 |
4.3 |
1.2 |
1.4 |
3.0 |
5.0 |
1.4 |
13.0 |
32.8 |
97.0 |
7.0 |
15.4 |
|||||
|
2013 |
5.2 |
7.5 |
10.0 |
7.0 |
5.1 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
3.0 |
6.0 |
1.3 |
15.0 |
33.4 |
101.0 |
6.0 |
16.2 |
|||||
|
2014 |
5.3 |
8.3 |
11.0 |
6.0 |
5.4 |
1.2 |
1.6 |
3.0 |
5.0 |
1.5 |
16.2 |
37.0 |
104.0 |
6.0 |
19.5 |
|||||
|
2015 |
5.5 |
16.8 |
12.0 |
3.0 |
6.0 |
1.3 |
3.2 |
3.0 |
4.0 |
1.7 |
16.9 |
74.7 |
108.0 |
4.0 |
20.9 |
|||||
|
2016 |
5.7 |
17.9 |
12.0 |
2.0 |
6.2 |
1.4 |
3.3 |
4.0 |
1.0 |
1.6 |
17.0 |
79.1 |
112.0 |
5.0 |
21.6 |
|||||
|
2017 |
5.3 |
18.4 |
11.0 |
1.0 |
6.3 |
1.4 |
3.5 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
1.6 |
16.7 |
82.2 |
116.0 |
4.0 |
21.8 |
|||||
|
2018 |
5.5 |
20.0 |
13.0 |
2.0 |
6.4 |
1.4 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
2.0 |
1.7 |
16.2 |
88.8 |
119.0 |
3.0 |
22.1 |
|||||
|
2019 |
5.1 |
20.9 |
13.0 |
2.0 |
6.3 |
1.3 |
4.0 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
1.7 |
15.6 |
92.8 |
123.0 |
3.0 |
21.7 |
|||||
|
Total |
48.5 |
131.5 |
102.0 |
41.0 |
52.1 |
12.4 |
24.9 |
29.0 |
35.0 |
14.5 |
142.7 |
584.4 |
974.0 |
52.0 |
176.3 |
|||||
|
E-TRC Source: EXH 2, BPS 246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Proposed Residential Conservation Goals for Gulf |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Summer MW |
Winter MW |
Annual GWh |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Gulf |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
Gulf |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
Gulf |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
||||||
|
2010 |
1.9 |
8.0 |
7.0 |
6.5 |
1.9 |
1.8 |
7.3 |
8.0 |
16.4 |
1.9 |
2.0 |
23.6 |
19.0 |
10.7 |
2.8 |
|||||
|
2011 |
2.8 |
8.0 |
16.0 |
6.4 |
2.7 |
2.5 |
7.3 |
18.0 |
16.2 |
2.5 |
4.0 |
23.8 |
42.0 |
10.5 |
5.4 |
|||||
|
2012 |
3.7 |
8.3 |
23.0 |
6.4 |
3.8 |
3.1 |
7.6 |
27.0 |
16.3 |
3.4 |
6.3 |
24.6 |
64.0 |
10.6 |
8.4 |
|||||
|
2013 |
4.5 |
8.4 |
24.0 |
6.7 |
4.9 |
3.7 |
7.7 |
29.0 |
17.8 |
4.5 |
8.2 |
24.8 |
68.0 |
11.6 |
11.6 |
|||||
|
2014 |
5.1 |
9.3 |
26.0 |
6.7 |
6.1 |
4.3 |
8.5 |
30.0 |
18.2 |
5.5 |
9.8 |
27.7 |
70.0 |
11.9 |
14.6 |
|||||
|
2015 |
5.7 |
18.8 |
26.0 |
6.7 |
7.2 |
4.6 |
17.2 |
30.0 |
18.2 |
6.9 |
11.0 |
55.7 |
74.0 |
11.9 |
18.0 |
|||||
|
2016 |
6.1 |
19.9 |
27.0 |
6.7 |
8.4 |
5.0 |
18.2 |
33.0 |
18.0 |
8.1 |
11.9 |
59.0 |
79.0 |
11.6 |
21.4 |
|||||
|
2017 |
6.1 |
20.7 |
29.0 |
6.7 |
9.1 |
5.0 |
18.9 |
35.0 |
18.0 |
8.7 |
12.1 |
61.3 |
85.0 |
11.6 |
23.2 |
|||||
|
2018 |
5.7 |
22.4 |
31.0 |
6.7 |
9.3 |
4.7 |
20.5 |
36.0 |
18.0 |
9.3 |
11.2 |
66.3 |
90.0 |
11.6 |
24.0 |
|||||
|
2019 |
5.4 |
23.3 |
33.0 |
6.7 |
9.5 |
4.5 |
21.3 |
37.0 |
18.0 |
9.7 |
10.3 |
69.1 |
96.0 |
11.6 |
24.5 |
|||||
|
Total |
47.0 |
147.1 |
242.0 |
66.2 |
62.9 |
39.2 |
134.5 |
283.0 |
175.1 |
60.5 |
86.8 |
435.9 |
687.0 |
113.6 |
153.9 |
|||||
|
E-TRC Source: Levelized Demand Response values from EXH 2, BPS 570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Proposed Commercial/Industrial Conservation Goals for Gulf |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Summer MW |
Winter MW |
Annual GWh |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Gulf |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
Gulf |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
Gulf |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
||||||
|
2010 |
1.2 |
4.9 |
3.0 |
1.8 |
1.2 |
0.5 |
1.6 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
2.7 |
24.7 |
21.0 |
4.4 |
3.2 |
|||||
|
2011 |
1.6 |
4.9 |
6.0 |
1.8 |
1.6 |
0.5 |
1.6 |
3.0 |
1.0 |
0.6 |
4.6 |
24.9 |
43.0 |
4.4 |
5.6 |
|||||
|
2012 |
1.9 |
5.1 |
9.0 |
1.8 |
2.1 |
0.6 |
1.7 |
3.0 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
6.1 |
25.7 |
66.0 |
4.4 |
7.7 |
|||||
|
2013 |
2.2 |
5.1 |
9.0 |
1.8 |
2.4 |
0.7 |
1.7 |
4.0 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
7.3 |
26.0 |
69.0 |
4.4 |
9.5 |
|||||
|
2014 |
2.4 |
5.7 |
10.0 |
1.8 |
2.7 |
0.7 |
1.8 |
5.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
8.0 |
28.9 |
70.0 |
4.4 |
10.8 |
|||||
|
2015 |
2.5 |
11.5 |
10.0 |
1.8 |
2.9 |
0.8 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
8.5 |
58.3 |
72.0 |
4.4 |
11.7 |
|||||
|
2016 |
2.6 |
12.2 |
11.0 |
1.8 |
3.0 |
0.8 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
8.9 |
61.8 |
75.0 |
4.4 |
12.3 |
|||||
|
2017 |
2.6 |
12.7 |
11.0 |
1.8 |
3.2 |
0.8 |
4.2 |
5.0 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
9.0 |
64.1 |
80.0 |
4.4 |
12.7 |
|||||
|
2018 |
2.5 |
13.7 |
12.0 |
1.8 |
3.1 |
0.8 |
4.4 |
5.0 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
8.8 |
69.4 |
85.0 |
4.4 |
12.5 |
|||||
|
2019 |
2.4 |
0.0 |
13.0 |
1.8 |
3.1 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
6.0 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
8.3 |
72.4 |
89.0 |
4.4 |
11.9 |
|||||
|
Total |
21.9 |
75.8 |
94.0 |
18.0 |
25.3 |
7.0 |
24.8 |
40.0 |
10.0 |
9.3 |
72.2 |
456.2 |
670.0 |
44.0 |
97.9 |
|||||
|
E-TRC Source: Levelized Demand Response values from EXH 2, BPS 570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Proposed Residential Conservation Goals for FPUC |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Summer MW |
Winter MW |
Annual GWh |
|||||||||||||||||
|
FPUC |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
FPUC |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
FPUC |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
||||||
|
2010 |
0.00 |
0.40 |
0.00 |
0.12 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
0.10 |
0.00 |
0.26 |
0.13 |
0.00 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
0.30 |
0.51 |
|||||
|
2011 |
0.00 |
0.30 |
0.00 |
0.12 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
0.10 |
0.00 |
0.26 |
0.13 |
0.00 |
1.40 |
0.00 |
0.30 |
0.51 |
|||||
|
2012 |
0.00 |
0.40 |
0.00 |
0.12 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
0.10 |
0.00 |
0.26 |
0.13 |
0.00 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
0.30 |
0.51 |
|||||
|
2013 |
0.00 |
0.40 |
0.00 |
0.12 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
0.26 |
0.13 |
0.00 |
1.60 |
0.00 |
0.30 |
0.51 |
|||||
|
2014 |
0.00 |
0.40 |
0.00 |
0.12 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
0.10 |
0.00 |
0.26 |
0.13 |
0.00 |
1.70 |
0.00 |
0.30 |
0.51 |
|||||
|
2015 |
0.00 |
0.80 |
0.00 |
0.12 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
0.30 |
0.00 |
0.26 |
0.13 |
0.00 |
3.40 |
0.00 |
0.30 |
0.51 |
|||||
|
2016 |
0.00 |
0.90 |
0.00 |
0.12 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
0.30 |
0.00 |
0.26 |
0.13 |
0.00 |
3.70 |
0.00 |
0.30 |
0.51 |
|||||
|
2017 |
0.00 |
0.90 |
0.00 |
0.12 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
0.26 |
0.13 |
0.00 |
3.80 |
0.00 |
0.30 |
0.51 |
|||||
|
2018 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.12 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
0.40 |
0.00 |
0.26 |
0.13 |
0.00 |
4.10 |
0.00 |
0.30 |
0.51 |
|||||
|
2019 |
0.00 |
1.10 |
0.00 |
0.12 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
0.30 |
0.00 |
0.26 |
0.13 |
0.00 |
4.20 |
0.00 |
0.30 |
0.51 |
|||||
|
Total |
0.00 |
6.60 |
0.00 |
1.20 |
2.02 |
0.00 |
2.10 |
0.00 |
2.60 |
1.33 |
0.00 |
26.90 |
0.00 |
3.00 |
5.14 |
|||||
|
E-TRC Source: Calculated from EXH 74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Proposed Commercial/Industrial Conservation Goals for FPUC |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Summer MW |
Winter MW |
Annual GWh |
|||||||||||||||||
|
FPUC |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
FPUC |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
FPUC |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
E-TRC |
||||||
|
2010 |
0.00 |
0.30 |
0.00 |
0.11 |
0.23 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
1.20 |
0.00 |
0.32 |
0.78 |
|||||
|
2011 |
0.00 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
0.11 |
0.23 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
1.20 |
0.00 |
0.32 |
0.78 |
|||||
|
2012 |
0.00 |
0.30 |
0.00 |
0.11 |
0.23 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
1.30 |
0.00 |
0.32 |
0.78 |
|||||
|
2013 |
0.00 |
0.30 |
0.00 |
0.11 |
0.23 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
1.20 |
0.00 |
0.32 |
0.78 |
|||||
|
2014 |
0.00 |
0.30 |
0.00 |
0.11 |
0.23 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
1.40 |
0.00 |
0.32 |
0.78 |
|||||
|
2015 |
0.00 |
0.60 |
0.00 |
0.11 |
0.23 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
2.80 |
0.00 |
0.32 |
0.78 |
|||||
|
2016 |
0.00 |
0.60 |
0.00 |
0.11 |
0.23 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
3.00 |
0.00 |
0.32 |
0.78 |
|||||
|
2017 |
0.00 |
0.70 |
0.00 |
0.11 |
0.23 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
3.20 |
0.00 |
0.32 |
0.78 |
|||||
|
2018 |
0.00 |
0.80 |
0.00 |
0.11 |
0.23 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
3.30 |
0.00 |
0.32 |
0.78 |
|||||
|
2019 |
0.00 |
0.70 |
0.00 |
0.11 |
0.23 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
3.50 |
0.00 |
0.32 |
0.78 |
|||||
|
Total |
0.00 |
4.80 |
0.00 |
1.10 |
2.26 |
0.00 |
7.00 |
0.00 |
0.70 |
0.56 |
0.00 |
22.10 |
0.00 |
3.20 |
7.79 |
|||||
|
E-TRC Source: Calculated from EXH 74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Proposed Residential Conservation Goals for OUC |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Summer MW |
Winter MW |
Annual GWh |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
OUC |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
OUC |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
OUC |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
2010 |
0.0 |
4.1 |
2.0 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
10.0 |
6.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2011 |
0.0 |
4.0 |
5.0 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
10.0 |
12.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2012 |
0.0 |
4.3 |
8.0 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
10.4 |
18.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2013 |
0.0 |
4.2 |
11.0 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
10.5 |
17.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2014 |
0.0 |
4.8 |
13.0 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
11.7 |
27.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2015 |
0.0 |
9.5 |
12.0 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
2.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
23.6 |
30.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2016 |
0.0 |
10.2 |
13.0 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
2.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
24.9 |
31.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2017 |
0.0 |
10.5 |
13.0 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
3.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
25.9 |
33.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2018 |
0.0 |
11.4 |
14.0 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
3.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
28.0 |
35.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2019 |
0.0 |
11.9 |
14.0 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
4.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
29.2 |
38.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Total |
0.0 |
74.9 |
105.0 |
5.0 |
0.0 |
0.5 |
17.0 |
2.0 |
0.0 |
184.2 |
257.0 |
18.0 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Proposed Commercial/Industrial Conservation Goals for OUC |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Summer MW |
Winter MW |
Annual GWh |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
OUC |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
OUC |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
OUC |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
2010 |
0.0 |
1.8 |
1.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
3.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
9.0 |
10.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2011 |
0.0 |
1.9 |
1.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
6.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
9.1 |
19.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2012 |
0.0 |
1.9 |
3.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
10.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
9.4 |
30.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2013 |
0.0 |
2.0 |
4.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
14.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
9.5 |
42.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2014 |
0.0 |
2.1 |
3.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
15.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
10.6 |
44.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2015 |
0.0 |
4.4 |
4.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
15.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
21.3 |
46.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2016 |
0.0 |
4.6 |
5.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
0.9 |
16.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
22.6 |
47.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2017 |
0.0 |
4.8 |
4.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
17.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
23.4 |
49.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2018 |
0.0 |
5.1 |
5.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
18.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
25.4 |
50.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2019 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
4.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
18.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
26.5 |
52.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Total |
0.0 |
34.0 |
34.0 |
7.0 |
0.0 |
6.6 |
132.0 |
7.0 |
0.0 |
166.8 |
389.0 |
18.0 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Proposed Residential Conservation Goals for JEA |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Summer MW |
Winter MW |
Annual GWh |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
JEA |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
JEA |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
JEA |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
2010 |
0 |
8.6 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
0.7 |
3 |
1.6 |
0 |
23.7 |
14 |
6.9 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2011 |
0 |
8.6 |
9 |
2 |
0 |
0.7 |
7 |
1.6 |
0 |
23.8 |
27 |
6.9 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2012 |
0 |
8.9 |
16 |
2 |
0 |
0.7 |
11 |
1.6 |
0 |
24.5 |
43 |
6.9 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2013 |
0 |
9.1 |
20 |
2 |
0 |
0.7 |
14 |
1.6 |
0 |
24.9 |
57 |
6.9 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2014 |
0 |
10 |
22 |
2 |
0 |
0.8 |
14 |
1.6 |
0 |
27.7 |
60 |
6.9 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2015 |
0 |
20.2 |
22 |
2 |
0 |
1.6 |
15 |
1.6 |
0 |
55.8 |
62 |
6.9 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2016 |
0 |
21.5 |
25 |
2 |
0 |
1.7 |
16 |
1.6 |
0 |
59 |
64 |
6.9 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2017 |
0 |
22.2 |
25 |
2 |
0 |
1.8 |
17 |
1.6 |
0 |
61.4 |
138 |
6.9 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2018 |
0 |
24.1 |
26 |
2 |
0 |
1.9 |
19 |
1.6 |
0 |
66.3 |
73 |
6.9 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2019 |
0 |
25.1 |
27 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
20 |
1.6 |
0 |
69.3 |
80 |
6.9 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Total |
0 |
158.3 |
197 |
20.3 |
0 |
12.6 |
136 |
15.5 |
0 |
436.4 |
618 |
69 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Proposed Commercial/Industrial Conservation Goals for JEA |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Summer MW |
Winter MW |
Annual GWh |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
JEA |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
JEA |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
JEA |
FSC/ |
NRDC/ |
STAFF |
|
|
|
||||||
|
GDS |
SACE |
GDS |
SACE |
GDS |
SACE |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
2010 |
0.0 |
5.2 |
3.0 |
2.4 |
0.0 |
0.9 |
4.0 |
1.4 |
0 |
24.3 |
3 |
22.1 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2011 |
0.0 |
5.2 |
5.0 |
2.4 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
9.0 |
1.4 |
0 |
24.4 |
7 |
22.1 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2012 |
0.0 |
5.3 |
8.0 |
2.4 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
13.0 |
1.4 |
0 |
25.2 |
11 |
22.1 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2013 |
0.0 |
5.5 |
11.0 |
2.4 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
17.0 |
1.4 |
0 |
25.5 |
15 |
22.1 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2014 |
0.0 |
6.0 |
12.0 |
2.4 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
19.0 |
1.4 |
0 |
28.4 |
15 |
22.1 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2015 |
0.0 |
12.2 |
13.0 |
2.4 |
0.0 |
2.3 |
18.0 |
1.4 |
0 |
57.2 |
15 |
22.1 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2016 |
0.0 |
13.0 |
13.0 |
2.4 |
0.0 |
2.3 |
20.0 |
1.4 |
0 |
60.6 |
17 |
22.1 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2017 |
0.0 |
13.4 |
14.0 |
2.4 |
0.0 |
2.4 |
21.0 |
1.4 |
0 |
62.9 |
17 |
22.1 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2018 |
0.0 |
14.5 |
14.0 |
2.4 |
0.0 |
2.7 |
24.0 |
1.4 |
0 |
68.1 |
18 |
22.1 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2019 |
0.0 |
15.1 |
15.0 |
2.4 |
0.0 |
2.7 |
25.0 |
1.4 |
0 |
71.0 |
18 |
22.1 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Total |
0.0 |
95.4 |
108.0 |
24.0 |
0.0 |
17.3 |
170.0 |
14.3 |
0 |
447.6 |
136 |
221.0 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||