Changes in appearance and in display of formulas, tables, and text may have occurred during translation of this document into an electronic medium. This HTML document may not be an accurate version of the official document and should not be relied on.
For an official paper copy, contact the Florida Public Service Commission at contact@psc.state.fl.us or call (850) 413-6770. There may be a charge for the copy.
|
|
|
||
|
DATE: |
|||
|
TO: |
Office of Commission Clerk (Cole) |
||
|
FROM: |
Division of Economic Regulation (Roberts) Office of the General Counsel (Brown) |
||
|
RE: |
Docket No. 100042-EI – Petition for approval of revised lighting tariff by Tampa Electric Company. |
||
|
AGENDA: |
03/16/10 – Regular Agenda – Tariff Filing – Interested Persons May Participate |
||
|
COMMISSIONERS ASSIGNED: |
|||
|
PREHEARING OFFICER: |
|||
|
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: |
|||
|
FILE NAME AND LOCATION: |
S:\PSC\ECR\WP\100042.RCM.DOC |
||
On January 21, 2010, Tampa Electric Company (TECO) filed a petition for Commission approval of revisions to its Lighting Tariff Sheet Nos. 6.805, 6.806, and 6.810. The requested revisions will offer several new Metal Halide (MH) fixtures under the Lighting Rate Schedule (LS-1). The Commission has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Sections 366.06 (1), Florida Statutes.
Issue 1:
Should the Commission suspend TECO's revised lighting tariff sheets Nos. 6.805, 6.806, and 6.810 for proposed new Metal Halide fixtures under Rate Schedule LS-1?
Recommendation:
Yes. (A. Roberts)
Staff Analysis:
Staff is recommending that the tariffs be suspended to allow staff sufficient time to review the petition and gather all pertinent information in order to present the Commission with an informed recommendation on the tariff proposal.
Pursuant to Section 366.03(3), Florida Statutes, the Commission may withhold consent to the operation of all or any portion of the new rate schedules, delivering to the utility requesting such increase a reason or written statement of good cause for doing so within 60 days. Staff believes the reason stated above is good cause consistent with the requirement of Section 366.06(3), Florida Statutes.
Issue 2:
Should this docket be closed?
Recommendation:
No. This docket should remain open pending the Commission’s final decision on the proposed tariff revision. (M. Brown)
Staff Analysis:
This docket should remain open pending the Commission’s final decision on the proposed tariff revision.