WARNING:

Changes in appearance and in display of formulas, tables, and text may have occurred during translation of this document into an electronic medium. This HTML document may not be an accurate version of the official document and should not be relied on.

For an official paper copy, contact the Florida Public Service Commission at contact@psc.state.fl.us or call (850) 413-6770. There may be a charge for the copy.

 

 

DATE:

June 30, 2010

TO:

Office of Commission Clerk (Cole)

FROM:

Division of Economic Regulation (Brady, Donoho, Marsh, Simpson)

Office of the General Counsel (Sayler)

RE:

Docket No. 100182-WS – Application for transfer of majority organizational control of Indiantown Company, Inc., holder of Certificate Nos. 387-W and 331-S in Martin County, from Linda M. Post and David Ralicki, trustees of the Robert Post Marital Trust, Postco, Inc., to Jeffrey S. Leslie.

County: Martin

AGENDA:

07/13/10 – Regular Agenda – Interested Persons May Participate

COMMISSIONERS ASSIGNED:

All Commissioners

PREHEARING OFFICER:

Edgar

CRITICAL DATES:

None

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:

None

FILE NAME AND LOCATION:

S:\PSC\ECR\WP\100182.RCM.DOC

 

 Case Background

Indiantown Company, Inc. (Indiantown or utility) is a Class A utility providing service to approximately 1,806 water and 1,712 wastewater customers in Martin County.  Indiantown’s service area is located in a portion of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) where there are currently no water use restrictions.  Indiantown’s 2009 annual report shows annual operating revenues of $750,247 and $1,134,023 with net operating losses of ($43,273) and ($48,428) for water and wastewater, respectively. 


In 1983, the Commission granted to the utility grandfather Certificate Nos. 387-W and 331-S.[1]  The Commission subsequently approved two amendments to the utility’s service territory.[2]

In 1997, the Commission approved the transfer of majority organizational control (TMOC) of the assets of Indiantown to Postco, Inc. (Postco), a company which was formed by Mr. Robert M. Post, Jr. to hold the assets of Indiantown.[3]  In 2007, Mr. Post died and control of Postco was transferred to the Robert M. Post Marital Trust (Trust or Seller) following the death of Mr. Post.  Linda M. Post and David Ralicki are the Trustees of the Trust.

On April 14, 2010, an application was filed by the Trustees of the Trust for the TMOC of Postco to Jeffrey S. Leslie (Mr. Leslie or Buyer) through a Stock Redemption Agreement (SRA) between the Trust, Postco, and Leslie.  The closing of the SRA is conditioned on approval by the Commission of the TMOC.  

An application for TMOC is governed by Section 367.071, Florida Statutes (F.S.), which states in part that no utility shall transfer its majority organizational control without determination and approval by this Commission that the proposed transfer is in the public interest.  The Commission has jurisdiction to consider this matter pursuant to Section 367.071, F.S.


Discussion of Issues

Issue 1

 Should the transfer of majority organizational control be approved?

Recommendation

 Yes, the transfer of majority organizational control of Indiantown’s parent, Postco, Inc., from the Trust to Jeffrey S. Leslie is in the public interest and should be approved effective the date of the Commission vote.  The resultant order should serve as the utility’s Certificate Nos. 387-W and 331-S and should be retained by the utility.  The tariff pages reflecting the transfer should be effective for services provided or connections made on or after the stamped approval date on the tariff sheets.  (Brady, Donoho, Marsh, Simpson, Sayler)

Staff Analysis

 On April 14, 2010, pursuant to Section 367.071, F.S. and Rule 25-30.037(3), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), an application was filed on behalf of Indiantown for the transfer of majority organizational control of its holding company, Postco, from the Trust to Mr. Leslie through a SRA between the Trust, Postco, and Mr. Leslie.  Since Postco owns 100% of the common stock of Indiantown, the transfer will result in a change of majority control of Indiantown from the Trust to Mr. Leslie.  The closing of the SRA is anticipated to occur only after regulatory approval has been obtained.

The SRA provides that, at the time of closing, the outstanding shares of Postco will be redeemed by Mr. Leslie from the Trust.  With the acquisition by Mr. Leslie of 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of stock in Postco; Mr. Leslie, thereby, obtains majority control of Indiantown.  While Mr. Leslie does not currently own any water or wastewater utilities, he has been President and CEO of Indiantown since 2007 and Chief Operating Officer since 1996.  Except for the purchase of the parking lot, the stock transaction will not involve the payment of cash by Mr. Leslie.  However, as part of the SRA transaction, the garbage operations and bank stock owned by Indiantown will be sold, and the proceeds will be used as specified in the SRA.

The application is in compliance with the governing statute, Section 367.071, F.S., and Rule 25-30.037(3), F.A.C., pertaining to an application for transfer of majority organizational control.  A description of the territory granted to Certificate Nos. 387-W and 331-S is appended to this memorandum as Attachment A.

Pursuant to Rule 25-30.037(3)(f), F.A.C., the application contained a statement of how the transfer is in the public interest.  According to the application, the transaction will not result in any change in management or operation of Indiantown, and Indiantown’s existing management and operation personnel will remain in place.  Mr. Leslie believes his knowledge and experience will allow him to maintain quality utility service for Indiantown’s customers.  In addition, Mr. Leslie has provided a statement of intent to fulfill the commitments, obligations, and representations of the seller with regard to utility matters.  As noted, the former owner died and the Trust is disposing of the assets of the estate.  Staff believes that Mr. Leslie has demonstrated technical and financial ability to continue to operate the utility based upon his years of experience managing the utility and the value of utility stock.

The application contains proof of compliance with the noticing provisions set forth in Rule 25-30.030, F.A.C.  No objections to this application were received and the time for the filing of such objections has expired.  Pursuant to Rule 25-30.037(3)(i), F.A.C., the application is to contain evidence that the utility has control of the land upon which the utility facilities are located.  A copy of the warranty deed in the name of Indiantown Company, Inc. was provided for the land on which the water and wastewater treatment facilities are located.

Staff has verified that Indiantown is current on filing its annual reports through 2008.  An extension was granted to file the 2009 annual report by June 30, 2010.  The annual report was timely filed on June 24, 2010.  All regulatory assessment fees (RAFs) are current through December 31, 2009.  The utility will continue to be responsible for filing annual reports and RAFs for 2009 and future years. 

Pursuant to Rule 25-30.037(3)(h), F.A.C., the application contains a statement that Mr. Leslie has determined that the utility’s systems appear to be in satisfactory condition and in substantial compliance with all applicable standards set by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP).  Staff has confirmed Mr. Leslie’s statement with the DEP.  DEP noted that it has approved modifications to Indiantown’s wastewater treatment plant to provide reuse service.  A new class of service for reuse was approved by the Commission in 2009.[4]  Staff has also confirmed that Indiantown is in good standing with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD).

Indiantown’s current rates were established pursuant to a rate case, effective July 20, 2005.[5]  Every year since the rate case, Indiantown has filed a price index, some with pass-through adjustments, as well.  Rule 25-9.044(1), F.A.C., provides that in the case of a change in ownership or control of a utility, the rates, classifications, and regulations of the former owner must continue unless authorized to change by the Commission.  The Buyer has not requested a change; therefore, the existing rates and charges shown on Attachment B should continue in effect. 

Based on the above, staff recommends that the transfer of majority organizational control of Indiantown Company, Inc.’s parent, Postco, Inc., from the Robert M. Post Martial Trust to Jeffrey S. Leslie is in the public interest and should be approved effective the date of the Commission vote.  The resultant order should serve as the utility’s Certificate Nos. 387-W and 331-S and should be retained by the utility.  The tariff pages reflecting the transfer should be effective for services provided or connections made on or after the stamped approval date on the tariff sheets.

 


Issue 2

 Should this docket be closed?

Recommendation

 Yes, because no further action is necessary, this docket should be closed.  (Sayler)

Staff Analysis

 Because no further action is necessary, this docket should be closed.


INDIANTOWN COMPANY, INC.

Martin County, Florida

Water and Wastewater Service Territory

 

 

Township 39 South, Range 38 East, Martin County

 

            All of Section 22, South of State Road 710 R/W

 

            Section 25, the South 1/2

 

            Section 26, the West 1/2 of the South 1/2

 

Parcel 1

 

            In Section 26, Township 39 South, Range 38 East, commence at the Northwest corner of said Section 26, thence south along the west line of said Section 26 to the intersection with the westerly projection of the north line of Tract 56, Block B according to the Plat of Indiantown Farms as recorded in Plat Book 1, page 80 Public Records, Martin County, Florida, and the Point of Beginning; thence east along the north line of Tracts 56 and 11 and the easterly projection thereof to the east line of the west one-half of said Section 26; thence south along said east line to the intersection with the easterly projection of the south line of said Tract 11; thence west along the south lines of said Tracts 11 and 56 and the westerly projections thence to the west line of the aforesaid Section 26; thence north along said west line to the Point of Beginning.

 

            All of Section 27, South of State Road 710 R/W

 

            All of Section 34

 

            All of Section 35, South of State Road 710 R/W

 

            All of Section 36

 

Township 40 South, Range 38 East, Martin County

 

Section 1

 

            The North 3/4 of the East ˝ of the East 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the West 1/2, and the West 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the West 1/2 lying North of West Farm Road.  (West Farm Road can be described approximately as follows:  From the Northeast corner of said section Run 3,309 feet South along the East line to the intersection of West Farm Road; thence North 86 degrees West along said road a distance of 1,095 feet; thence North 59 degrees West a distance of 3,017 feet; thence North 77 degrees West a distance of 1,338 feet to the intersection of said road with the West line of said section.  This point is also being 1,314 feet south of the Northwest corner of said section.)

Section 2

 

            The area lying North of West Farm Road.  (West Farm Road can be described approximately as follows:  From the Northeast corner of said section run South along the East Section line a distance of 1,314 feet to the intersection of West Farm Road; thence North 77 degrees West a distance of 1,241 feet; thence North 61 degrees West a distance of 2,093 feet to the intersection of the North line of said section.  This point also being 3,090 feet West of the Northeast corner of said section.)

 

Township 39 South, Range 39 East, Martin County

 

            All of Section 33

 

Parcel 2

 

            Section 31, the South 1/4

 

            Begin at the Northwest corner of Section 31, Township 39 South, Range 39 East, in the centerline of County Road 609 (SW Allapattah Road); thence east along the north line of said Section 31 to the northeast corner of said Section 31; thence south along the east line of said Section 31 to the intersection with the south line of the North half of the South half of said Section 31; thence west along said south line to the intersection with the west line of said Section 31 and the centerline of said County road 609; thence north along said west line and centerline to the Northwest corner of said Section 31 and the Point of Beginning.

 

Parcel 3

 

            Begin at the Northeast corner of Section 32, Township 39 South, Range 39 East; thence south along the east line of said Section 32 a distance of 1,656 feet; thence northwest to the intersection with the north line of said Section 32, at a point 1,880 feet west of the Northeast corner of said Section 32, thence east along said north line to the Northeast corner of said Section 32 and the Point of Beginning.

 

Parcel 4

 

            Begin at the Southwest corner of Section 32, Township 39 South, Range 39 East; thence north along the west line of said Section 32 to the intersection with the north line of the Southwest one quarter (SW 1/4) of said Section 32; thence east along said north line to the intersection with the east line of said Southwest one quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 32; thence south along said east line to the intersection with the south line of said Section 32; thence west along said south line to the Southwest corner of said Section 32 and the Point of Beginning.

 

 

Township 40 South, Range 39 East, Martin County

            All of Section 5

 

            All of Section 6

 

            All of Sections 4, 7, 8, 9, North of the St. Lucie Canal R/W

 

Parcel 5

 

            Being a parcel of land lying in Sections 8 and 9, Township 40 South, Range 39 East, Martin County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:  being bounded on the northwest by the southerly right-of-way line of State Road 76 and being bounded on the northeast and southeast by the westerly and northwesterly right-of-way line of SW Indiantown Avenue and being bounded on the southwest by the easterly right of way line of State Road 710.

 

 


FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

authorizes

Indiantown Company, Inc.

pursuant to

Certificate Number 387-W

 

to provide water service in Martin County in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 367, Florida Statutes, and the Rules, Regulations, and Orders of this Commission in the territory described by the Orders of this Commission.  This authorization shall remain in force and effect until superseded, suspended, cancelled or revoked by Order of this Commission.

 

Order Number                         Date Issued      Docket Number           Filing Type

 

11891                                      04/27/83          810037-WS (CR)        Grandfather

 

PSC-92-0116-FOF-WS         03/30/92          910726-WS                 Amendment

 

PSC-97-1171-FOF-WS         10/01/97          970556-WS                 Transfer of Majority Control

 

PSC-04-0967-FOF-WS         10/05/04          040497-WS                 Amendment

 

*                                              *                      100182-WS                 Transfer of Majority Control

 

*Order Number and date to be provided at time of issuance.


FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

authorizes

Indiantown Company, Inc.

pursuant to

Certificate Number 331-S

 

to provide wastewater service in Martin County in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 367, Florida Statutes, and the Rules, Regulations, and Orders of this Commission in the territory described by the Orders of this Commission.  This authorization shall remain in force and effect until superseded, suspended, cancelled or revoked by Order of this Commission.

 

Order Number                         Date Issued      Docket Number           Filing Type

 

11891                                      04/27/83          810037-WS (CR)        Grandfather

 

PSC-92-0116-FOF-WS         03/30/92          910726-WS                 Amendment

 

PSC-97-1171-FOF-WS         10/01/97          970556-WS                 Transfer of Majority Control

 

PSC-04-0967-FOF-WS         10/05/04          040497-WS                 Amendment

 

*                                              *                      100182-WS                 Transfer of Majority Control

 

*Order Number and date to be provided at time of issuance.


 INDIANTOWN COMPANY, INC.

Schedules of Rates and Charges

 

 

Monthly Water

Monthly Water

Base Facility Charge

Meter Size:

Residential Service

 

General Service

 

5/8" x 3/4"

$      11.91

$      11.91

1"

29.78

29.78

1 1/2"

59.59

59.59

2”

 95.35

 95.35

3”

190.70

190.70

4”

297.96

297.96

6”

595.96

595.96

8”

  953.53

  953.53

8” Turbo

 

1,072.73

Charge per 1,000 gallons 

 

 

     0-8,000 gallons

   $        1.93

 

     8,000-15,000 gallons

2.14

 

     Over 15,000 gallons

2.90

 

Charge per 1,000 gallons

 

 $    2.15

 

 

Monthly Wastewater

Monthly Wastewater

Base Facility Charge

Meter Size:

Residential Service

 

General Service

 

5/8" x 3/4"

$      22.20

$      22.20

1”

    

55.50

1 1/2"

     

110.98

2”

     

177.57

3”

      

355.14

4”

     

554.90

6”

       

1,109.81

8”

       

1,775.70

8” Turbo

       

1,997.65

Charge per 1,000 gallons water

$        4.15

 

      (10,000 gallons maximum)

 

 

Charge per 1,000 gallons water

 

$      4.98

 

 

 

Monthly

Monthly

 

Fire Protection Service

Reclaimed Water Service

Meter Size:

 

 

2"

$      7.93

 

3"

15.89

 

4"

24.82

 

6"

 49.66

 

8"

79.46

 

 

 

 

Charge per 1,000 gallons

 

 

     Indiantown CoGeneration, LP *

   

     $     0.00

     All Others

 

0.40

*  For term of existing contract

 

 


Indiantown Company, Inc.

Schedule of Rates and Charges, continued

 

Service Availability and Miscellaneous Charges

 

 

 

Description

Water Charge

Wastewater Charge

 

 

 

 

 

Plant Capacity Charge

 

 

 

     Residential per ERC (300 gpd)

$    262.00

 

 

     All other per gallon

$        0.87

 

 

 

 

 

 

Main Extension Charge (Water)

 

 

 

     Residential per ERC (300 gpd)

$1,578.00

 

 

     All others per gallon

$       5.26

 

 

 

 

 

 

Main Extension Charge (Wastewater)

 

 

 

     Residential per ERC (250 gpd)

 

$ 679.00

 

     All other per gallon

 

$     2.72

 

 

 

 

 

Monthly Guaranteed Revenue Charge

 

 

 

     Residential per ERC / month)

 

$     6.25

 

 

Meter Installation Charge

 

     5/8” x 3/4"

$      100.00

  

     3/4"

125.00

 

     1”

150.00

 

     1-1/4

175.00

 

     1-1/2

250.00

 

     2”

375.00

 

     Over 2”

Actual Cost

 

 

Miscellaneous Service Charges

 

     Initial Connection Fee

$      15.00

$      15.00

     Normal Reconnection Fee

15.00

15.00

     Violation Reconnection Fee

15.00

Actual Cost

     Premises Visit Fee

10.00

10.00

          (in lieu of disconnection)

 

 

 

 



[1] Order No. 11891, issued April 27, 1983, in Docket No. 810037-WS (CR), In re: Application of Indiantown Company, Inc., for certificates and increased water and sewer rates in Martin County, Florida.

[2] Order No. PSC-92-0116-FOF-WS, issued March 30, 1992, in Docket No. 910726-WS, In re: Application. for amendment of Certificates Nos. 387-W and 331-S in Martin County by Indiantown Company, Inc. and Order No. PSC-04-0967-FOF-WS, issued October 5, 2004, in Docket No. 040497-WS, In re:  Application for amendment of Certificates 387-W and 331-S to add territory in Martin County by Indiantown Company, Inc.

[3] Order No. PSC-97-1171-FOF-WS, issued October 1, 1997, in Docket No. 970556-WS, In re:  Application for transfer of majority organizational control of Indiantown Company, Inc. (holder of Certificates Nos. 331-S and 387-W) in Martin County to Postco, Inc.

[4] Order No. PSC-09-0393-TRF-SU, issued June 2, 2009, in Docket No. 080712-SU, In re:  Application for approval of a new class of service for reuse water service in Martin County by Indiantown Company, Inc.

[5] Order No. PSC-05-0624-PAA-WS, issued June 7, 2005, in Docket No. 040450-WS, In re: Application for rate increase in Martin County by Indiantown Company, Inc.  Indiantown’s rates and charges were originally established in 1983 pursuant to Order No. 11891.