Changes in appearance and in display of formulas, tables, and text may have occurred during translation of this document into an electronic medium. This HTML document may not be an accurate version of the official document and should not be relied on.
For an official paper copy, contact the Florida Public Service Commission at contact@psc.state.fl.us or call (850) 413-6770. There may be a charge for the copy.
|
|
||
DATE: |
|||
TO: |
Office of Commission Clerk (Cole) |
||
FROM: |
Division of Economic Regulation (Brady, Donoho, Marsh, Simpson) Office of the General Counsel (Sayler) |
||
RE: |
Docket No. 100182-WS – Application for transfer of majority organizational control of Indiantown Company, Inc., holder of Certificate Nos. 387-W and 331-S in Martin County, from Linda M. Post and David Ralicki, trustees of the Robert Post Marital Trust, Postco, Inc., to Jeffrey S. Leslie. County: Martin |
||
AGENDA: |
07/13/10 – Regular Agenda – Interested Persons May Participate |
||
COMMISSIONERS ASSIGNED: |
|||
PREHEARING OFFICER: |
|||
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: |
|||
FILE NAME AND LOCATION: |
S:\PSC\ECR\WP\100182.RCM.DOC |
||
Indiantown Company, Inc. (Indiantown or utility) is a Class A utility providing service to approximately 1,806 water and 1,712 wastewater customers in Martin County. Indiantown’s service area is located in a portion of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) where there are currently no water use restrictions. Indiantown’s 2009 annual report shows annual operating revenues of $750,247 and $1,134,023 with net operating losses of ($43,273) and ($48,428) for water and wastewater, respectively.
In 1983, the Commission granted to the utility grandfather Certificate Nos. 387-W and 331-S.[1] The Commission subsequently approved two amendments to the utility’s service territory.[2]
In 1997, the Commission approved the transfer of majority organizational control (TMOC) of the assets of Indiantown to Postco, Inc. (Postco), a company which was formed by Mr. Robert M. Post, Jr. to hold the assets of Indiantown.[3] In 2007, Mr. Post died and control of Postco was transferred to the Robert M. Post Marital Trust (Trust or Seller) following the death of Mr. Post. Linda M. Post and David Ralicki are the Trustees of the Trust.
On April 14, 2010, an application was filed by the Trustees of the Trust for the TMOC of Postco to Jeffrey S. Leslie (Mr. Leslie or Buyer) through a Stock Redemption Agreement (SRA) between the Trust, Postco, and Leslie. The closing of the SRA is conditioned on approval by the Commission of the TMOC.
An application for TMOC is governed by Section 367.071, Florida Statutes (F.S.), which states in part that no utility shall transfer its majority organizational control without determination and approval by this Commission that the proposed transfer is in the public interest. The Commission has jurisdiction to consider this matter pursuant to Section 367.071, F.S.
Issue 1:
Should the transfer of majority organizational control be approved?
Recommendation:
Yes, the transfer of majority organizational control of Indiantown’s parent, Postco, Inc., from the Trust to Jeffrey S. Leslie is in the public interest and should be approved effective the date of the Commission vote. The resultant order should serve as the utility’s Certificate Nos. 387-W and 331-S and should be retained by the utility. The tariff pages reflecting the transfer should be effective for services provided or connections made on or after the stamped approval date on the tariff sheets. (Brady, Donoho, Marsh, Simpson, Sayler)
Staff Analysis:
Staff has verified that Indiantown is current on filing its annual reports through 2008. An extension was granted to file the 2009 annual report by June 30, 2010. The annual report was timely filed on June 24, 2010. All regulatory assessment fees (RAFs) are current through December 31, 2009. The utility will continue to be responsible for filing annual reports and RAFs for 2009 and future years.
Indiantown’s current rates were established pursuant to a rate case, effective July 20, 2005.[5] Every year since the rate case, Indiantown has filed a price index, some with pass-through adjustments, as well. Rule 25-9.044(1), F.A.C., provides that in the case of a change in ownership or control of a utility, the rates, classifications, and regulations of the former owner must continue unless authorized to change by the Commission. The Buyer has not requested a change; therefore, the existing rates and charges shown on Attachment B should continue in effect.
Based on the above, staff recommends that the transfer of majority organizational control of Indiantown Company, Inc.’s parent, Postco, Inc., from the Robert M. Post Martial Trust to Jeffrey S. Leslie is in the public interest and should be approved effective the date of the Commission vote. The resultant order should serve as the utility’s Certificate Nos. 387-W and 331-S and should be retained by the utility. The tariff pages reflecting the transfer should be effective for services provided or connections made on or after the stamped approval date on the tariff sheets.
Issue 2:
Should this docket be closed?
Recommendation:
Yes, because no further action is necessary, this docket should be closed. (Sayler)
Staff Analysis:
Because no further action is necessary, this docket should be closed.
INDIANTOWN COMPANY, INC.
Martin County, Florida
Water and Wastewater Service Territory
Township 39 South, Range 38 East, Martin County
All of Section 22, South of State Road 710 R/W
Section 25, the South 1/2
Section 26, the West 1/2 of the South 1/2
Parcel 1
In Section 26, Township 39 South, Range 38 East, commence at the Northwest corner of said Section 26, thence south along the west line of said Section 26 to the intersection with the westerly projection of the north line of Tract 56, Block B according to the Plat of Indiantown Farms as recorded in Plat Book 1, page 80 Public Records, Martin County, Florida, and the Point of Beginning; thence east along the north line of Tracts 56 and 11 and the easterly projection thereof to the east line of the west one-half of said Section 26; thence south along said east line to the intersection with the easterly projection of the south line of said Tract 11; thence west along the south lines of said Tracts 11 and 56 and the westerly projections thence to the west line of the aforesaid Section 26; thence north along said west line to the Point of Beginning.
All of Section 27, South of State Road 710 R/W
All of Section 34
All of Section 35, South of State Road 710 R/W
All of Section 36
Township 40 South, Range 38 East, Martin County
Section 1
The North 3/4 of the East ˝ of the East 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the West 1/2, and the West 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the West 1/2 lying North of West Farm Road. (West Farm Road can be described approximately as follows: From the Northeast corner of said section Run 3,309 feet South along the East line to the intersection of West Farm Road; thence North 86 degrees West along said road a distance of 1,095 feet; thence North 59 degrees West a distance of 3,017 feet; thence North 77 degrees West a distance of 1,338 feet to the intersection of said road with the West line of said section. This point is also being 1,314 feet south of the Northwest corner of said section.)
Section 2
The area lying North of West Farm Road. (West Farm Road can be described approximately as follows: From the Northeast corner of said section run South along the East Section line a distance of 1,314 feet to the intersection of West Farm Road; thence North 77 degrees West a distance of 1,241 feet; thence North 61 degrees West a distance of 2,093 feet to the intersection of the North line of said section. This point also being 3,090 feet West of the Northeast corner of said section.)
Township 39 South, Range 39 East, Martin County
All of Section 33
Parcel 2
Section 31, the South 1/4
Begin at the Northwest corner of Section 31, Township 39 South, Range 39 East, in the centerline of County Road 609 (SW Allapattah Road); thence east along the north line of said Section 31 to the northeast corner of said Section 31; thence south along the east line of said Section 31 to the intersection with the south line of the North half of the South half of said Section 31; thence west along said south line to the intersection with the west line of said Section 31 and the centerline of said County road 609; thence north along said west line and centerline to the Northwest corner of said Section 31 and the Point of Beginning.
Parcel 3
Begin at the Northeast corner of Section 32, Township 39 South, Range 39 East; thence south along the east line of said Section 32 a distance of 1,656 feet; thence northwest to the intersection with the north line of said Section 32, at a point 1,880 feet west of the Northeast corner of said Section 32, thence east along said north line to the Northeast corner of said Section 32 and the Point of Beginning.
Parcel 4
Begin at the Southwest corner of Section 32, Township 39 South, Range 39 East; thence north along the west line of said Section 32 to the intersection with the north line of the Southwest one quarter (SW 1/4) of said Section 32; thence east along said north line to the intersection with the east line of said Southwest one quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 32; thence south along said east line to the intersection with the south line of said Section 32; thence west along said south line to the Southwest corner of said Section 32 and the Point of Beginning.
Township 40 South, Range 39 East, Martin County
All of Section 5
All of Section 6
All of Sections 4, 7, 8, 9, North of the St. Lucie Canal R/W
Parcel 5
Being a parcel of land lying in Sections 8 and 9, Township 40 South, Range 39 East, Martin County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: being bounded on the northwest by the southerly right-of-way line of State Road 76 and being bounded on the northeast and southeast by the westerly and northwesterly right-of-way line of SW Indiantown Avenue and being bounded on the southwest by the easterly right of way line of State Road 710.
FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
authorizes
Indiantown Company, Inc.
pursuant to
Certificate Number 387-W
to provide water service in Martin County in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 367, Florida Statutes, and the Rules, Regulations, and Orders of this Commission in the territory described by the Orders of this Commission. This authorization shall remain in force and effect until superseded, suspended, cancelled or revoked by Order of this Commission.
Order Number Date Issued Docket Number Filing Type
11891 04/27/83 810037-WS (CR) Grandfather
PSC-92-0116-FOF-WS 03/30/92 910726-WS Amendment
PSC-97-1171-FOF-WS 10/01/97 970556-WS Transfer of Majority Control
PSC-04-0967-FOF-WS 10/05/04 040497-WS Amendment
* * 100182-WS Transfer of Majority Control
*Order Number and date to be provided at time of issuance.
FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
authorizes
Indiantown Company, Inc.
pursuant to
Certificate Number 331-S
to provide wastewater service in Martin County in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 367, Florida Statutes, and the Rules, Regulations, and Orders of this Commission in the territory described by the Orders of this Commission. This authorization shall remain in force and effect until superseded, suspended, cancelled or revoked by Order of this Commission.
Order Number Date Issued Docket Number Filing Type
11891 04/27/83 810037-WS (CR) Grandfather
PSC-92-0116-FOF-WS 03/30/92 910726-WS Amendment
PSC-97-1171-FOF-WS 10/01/97 970556-WS Transfer of Majority Control
PSC-04-0967-FOF-WS 10/05/04 040497-WS Amendment
* * 100182-WS Transfer of Majority Control
*Order Number and date to be provided at time of issuance.
INDIANTOWN COMPANY, INC.
Schedules of Rates and Charges
|
Monthly Water |
Monthly Water |
Base Facility Charge Meter Size: |
Residential Service
|
General Service
|
5/8" x 3/4" |
$ 11.91 |
$ 11.91 |
1" |
29.78 |
29.78 |
1 1/2" |
59.59 |
59.59 |
2” |
95.35 |
95.35 |
3” |
190.70 |
190.70 |
4” |
297.96 |
297.96 |
6” |
595.96 |
595.96 |
8” |
953.53 |
953.53 |
8” Turbo |
|
1,072.73 |
Charge per 1,000 gallons |
|
|
0-8,000 gallons |
$ 1.93 |
|
8,000-15,000 gallons |
2.14 |
|
Over 15,000 gallons |
2.90 |
|
Charge per 1,000 gallons |
|
$ 2.15 |
|
Monthly Wastewater |
Monthly Wastewater |
Base Facility Charge Meter Size: |
Residential Service
|
General Service
|
5/8" x 3/4" |
$ 22.20 |
$ 22.20 |
1” |
|
55.50 |
1 1/2" |
|
110.98 |
2” |
|
177.57 |
3” |
|
355.14 |
4” |
|
554.90 |
6” |
|
1,109.81 |
8” |
|
1,775.70 |
8” Turbo |
|
1,997.65 |
Charge per 1,000 gallons water |
$ 4.15 |
|
(10,000 gallons maximum) |
|
|
Charge per 1,000 gallons water |
|
$ 4.98 |
|
|
|
|
Monthly |
Monthly |
|
Fire Protection Service |
Reclaimed Water Service |
Meter Size: |
|
|
2" |
$ 7.93 |
|
3" |
15.89 |
|
4" |
24.82 |
|
6" |
49.66 |
|
8" |
79.46 |
|
|
|
|
Charge per 1,000 gallons |
|
|
Indiantown CoGeneration, LP * |
|
$ 0.00 |
All Others |
|
0.40 |
* For term of existing contract |
|
|
Indiantown Company, Inc.
Schedule of Rates and Charges, continued
Service Availability and Miscellaneous Charges
|
|
|
|||
Description |
Water Charge |
Wastewater Charge |
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
Plant Capacity Charge |
|
|
|
||
Residential per ERC (300 gpd) |
$ 262.00 |
|
|
||
All other per gallon |
$ 0.87 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
Main Extension Charge (Water) |
|
|
|
||
Residential per ERC (300 gpd) |
$1,578.00 |
|
|
||
All others per gallon |
$ 5.26 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
Main Extension Charge (Wastewater) |
|
|
|
||
Residential per ERC (250 gpd) |
|
$ 679.00 |
|
||
All other per gallon |
|
$ 2.72 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
Monthly Guaranteed Revenue Charge |
|
|
|
||
Residential per ERC / month) |
|
$ 6.25 |
|
||
Meter Installation Charge |
|
|
5/8” x 3/4" |
$ 100.00 |
|
3/4" |
125.00 |
|
1” |
150.00 |
|
1-1/4 |
175.00 |
|
1-1/2 |
250.00 |
|
2” |
375.00 |
|
Over 2” |
Actual Cost |
|
Miscellaneous Service Charges |
|
|
Initial Connection Fee |
$ 15.00 |
$ 15.00 |
Normal Reconnection Fee |
15.00 |
15.00 |
Violation Reconnection Fee |
15.00 |
Actual Cost |
Premises Visit Fee |
10.00 |
10.00 |
(in lieu of disconnection) |
|
|
[1] Order No. 11891, issued April 27, 1983, in Docket No. 810037-WS (CR), In re: Application of Indiantown Company, Inc., for certificates and increased water and sewer rates in Martin County, Florida.
[2] Order No. PSC-92-0116-FOF-WS, issued March 30, 1992, in Docket No. 910726-WS, In re: Application. for amendment of Certificates Nos. 387-W and 331-S in Martin County by Indiantown Company, Inc. and Order No. PSC-04-0967-FOF-WS, issued October 5, 2004, in Docket No. 040497-WS, In re: Application for amendment of Certificates 387-W and 331-S to add territory in Martin County by Indiantown Company, Inc.
[3] Order No. PSC-97-1171-FOF-WS, issued October 1, 1997, in Docket No. 970556-WS, In re: Application for transfer of majority organizational control of Indiantown Company, Inc. (holder of Certificates Nos. 331-S and 387-W) in Martin County to Postco, Inc.
[4] Order No. PSC-09-0393-TRF-SU, issued June 2, 2009, in Docket No. 080712-SU, In re: Application for approval of a new class of service for reuse water service in Martin County by Indiantown Company, Inc.
[5] Order No. PSC-05-0624-PAA-WS, issued June 7, 2005, in Docket No. 040450-WS, In re: Application for rate increase in Martin County by Indiantown Company, Inc. Indiantown’s rates and charges were originally established in 1983 pursuant to Order No. 11891.