WARNING: Changes in appearance and in display of formulas, tables, and text may have occurred during translation of this document into an electronic medium. This HTML document may not be an accurate version of the official document and should not be relied on. For an official paper copy, contact the Florida Public Service Commission at contact@psc.state.fl.us or call (850) 413-6770. There may be a charge for the copy.

 

 

DATE:

September 12, 2013

TO:

Office of Commission Clerk (Cole)

FROM:

Division of Economics (Draper)

Office of the General Counsel (Lawson)

RE:

Docket No. 130223-EI – Petition for approval of optional non-standard meter rider, by Florida Power & Light Company.

AGENDA:

09/25/13Regular Agenda – Tariff Filing – Interested Persons May Participate

COMMISSIONERS ASSIGNED:

All Commissioners

PREHEARING OFFICER:

Administrative

CRITICAL DATES:

10/20/13 (60-Day Suspension Date)

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:

None

FILE NAME AND LOCATION:

S:\PSC\ECO\WP\130223.RCM.DOC

 

 Case Background

On August 21, 2013, Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) filed a petition for approval of an optional Non-Standard Meter Rider tariff.  The tariff would be available to customers who elect non-standard non-communicating meter service in lieu of the standard communicating meter service.  This is staff’s recommendation to suspend the proposed tariff.  The Commission has jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 366, Florida Statutes (F.S.).


Discussion of Issues

Issue 1: 

 Should the Commission suspend FPL's proposed Non-Standard Meter Rider tariff?

Recommendation

 Yes.  (Draper)

Staff Analysis

 Staff is recommending that the tariff be suspended to allow staff and any other interested parties sufficient time to review the petition and gather all pertinent information in order to present the Commission with an informed recommendation on the tariff proposal.

Pursuant to Section 366.06(3), F.S., the Commission may withhold consent to the operation of all or any portion of a new rate schedule, delivering to the utility requesting such increase a reason or written statement of good cause for doing so within 60 days.  Staff believes that the reason stated above is good cause consistent with the requirement of Section 366.06(3), F.S.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issue 2: 

 Should this docket be closed?

Recommendation

 No.  (Lawson)

Staff Analysis

 This docket should remain open pending the Commission vote on the proposed tariff.