Changes in appearance and in display of formulas, tables, and text may have occurred during translation of this document into an electronic medium. This HTML document may not be an accurate version of the official document and should not be relied on.
For an official paper copy, contact the Florida Public Service Commission at contact@psc.state.fl.us or call (850) 413-6770. There may be a charge for the copy.
|
|
||
DATE: |
|||
TO: |
Office of Commission Clerk (Stauffer) |
||
FROM: |
Division of Engineering (Matthews, Mtenga) Office of the General Counsel (Corbari) |
||
RE: |
|||
AGENDA: |
07/10/14 – Regular Agenda – Proposed Agency Action – Interested Persons May Participate |
||
COMMISSIONERS ASSIGNED: |
|||
PREHEARING OFFICER: |
|||
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: |
|||
Section 366.91(3), Florida Statutes (F.S.) requires that each investor-owned utility (IOU) continuously offers to purchase capacity and energy from renewable energy generators. Commission Rules 25-17.200 through 25-17.310, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), implement the statute and require each IOU to file with the Commission by April 1 of each year a standard offer contract to purchase the capacity and energy from such renewable generators, with estimated payments based on the next avoidable fossil-fueled generating unit of each technology type identified in the utility’s current Ten-Year Site Plan. On April 1, 2014, Tampa Electric Company (TECO or Utility) filed a petition for approval of revisions to its standard offer contract and associated rate schedule. The Commission has jurisdiction over this standard offer contract pursuant to Sections 366.04 through 366.06, and 366.91, F.S.
Issue 1:
Should the Commission approve the revised standard offer contract filed by Tampa Electric Company?
Recommendation:
Yes. The provisions of the revised standard offer contract and related rate schedule COG-2 conform to all requirements of Rules 25-17.200 through 25-17.310, F.A.C. The revised standard offer contract provides flexibility in the arrangements for payments so that a developer of renewable generation may select the payment stream best suited to its financial needs. Staff recommends that the revised standard offer contract and related rate schedule COG-2 submitted by TECO be approved as filed. (Matthews, Mtenga)
Staff Analysis:
Rule 25-17.250, F.A.C., requires that TECO, an IOU, continuously make available a standard offer contract for the purchase of firm capacity and energy from renewable generating facilities (RF) and small qualifying facilities (QF) with design capacities of 100 kilowatt (kW) or less. Pursuant to Rule 25-17.250(1), F.A.C., the standard offer contract must provide a term of at least ten years, and the payment terms must be based on the Utility’s next avoidable fossil-fueled generating unit identified in its most recent Ten-Year Site Plan, or if no avoided unit is identified, its next avoidable planned purchase. TECO has identified a 220 MW natural gas-fired combustion turbine (CT) as its next avoidable fossil-fueled generating unit in its 2014 Ten-Year Site Plan. The projected in-servide date of this unit is May 1, 2020.
The RF/QF operator may elect to make no commitment as to the quantity or timing of its deliveries to TECO, and to have a committed capacity of zero (0) MW. Under such a scenario, the energy is delivered on an as-available basis and the operator receives only an energy payment. Alternatively, the RF/QF operator may elect to commit to certain minimum performance requirements based on the identified avoided unit, such as being operational and delivering the agreed upon amount of capacity by the in-service date of the avoided unit, and thereby becomes eligible for capacity payments in addition to payments received for energy. The standard offer contract can also serve as a starting point for negotiation of contract terms by providing payment information to an RF/QF operator, in a situation where one or both parties desire particular contract terms other than those set down in the standard offer.
In order to promote renewable generation, the Commission requires the IOU to offer multiple options for capacity payments, including the options to receive early or levelized payments. If the RF/QF operator elects to receive capacity payments under the normal or levelized contract options, it will receive as-available energy payments only until the in-service date of the avoided unit (in this case May 1, 2020), and thereafter begin receiving capacity payments in addition to the energy payments. If either the early or early levelized option is selected, then the operator will begin receiving capacity payments earlier than the in-service date of the avoided unit. However, payments made under the early capacity payments options tend to be lower in the later years of the contract term because the net present value (NPV) of the total payments must remain equal for all contract options.
Table 1 below estimates the annual payments for each payment option available under the revised standard offer contract to an operator with a 50 MW facility and an in-service date of May 1, 2020, and operating at a 90 percent capacity factor, which is the minimum capacity factor required to qualify for full capacity payments.
Table 1- Estimated Annual Payments to a 50 MW Renewable Facility
(90% Capacity Factor)
Year |
Energy Payment |
Capacity Payment (By Type) |
|||
Normal |
Levelized |
Early |
Early Levelized |
||
($000) |
($000) |
($000) |
($000) |
($000) |
|
2015 |
14,463 |
0 |
0 |
2,377 |
2,888 |
2016 |
15,328 |
0 |
0 |
2,446 |
2,896 |
2017 |
13,694 |
0 |
0 |
2,517 |
2,905 |
2018 |
14,620 |
0 |
0 |
2,589 |
2,914 |
2019 |
15,386 |
0 |
0 |
2,664 |
2,923 |
2020 |
19,825 |
2,852 |
4,961 |
2,741 |
2,933 |
2021 |
22,628 |
4,402 |
4,976 |
2,821 |
2,942 |
2022 |
23,459 |
4,530 |
4,992 |
2,902 |
2,952 |
2023 |
24,783 |
4,661 |
5,008 |
2,986 |
2,962 |
2024 |
26,548 |
4,795 |
5,024 |
3,073 |
2,972 |
2025 |
28,277 |
4,934 |
5,041 |
3,162 |
2,983 |
2026 |
28,445 |
5,077 |
5,058 |
3,253 |
2,994 |
2027 |
29,754 |
5,224 |
5,076 |
3,348 |
3,005 |
2028 |
31,430 |
5,375 |
5,094 |
3,445 |
3,016 |
2029 |
33,232 |
5,531 |
5,112 |
3,544 |
3,028 |
2030 |
33,629 |
5,691 |
5,131 |
3,647 |
3,040 |
2031 |
35,029 |
5,856 |
5,150 |
3,753 |
3,052 |
2032 |
37,318 |
6,026 |
5,170 |
3,862 |
3,064 |
2033 |
39,419 |
6,200 |
5,190 |
3,974 |
3,077 |
2034 |
39,875 |
6,380 |
5,210 |
4,089 |
3,090 |
Total |
527,141 |
77,534 |
76,193 |
63,192 |
59,634 |
2014 NPV |
254,865 |
32,764 |
32,764 |
32,764 |
32,764 |
The type-and-strike format versions of the revised standard offer contract and associated rate schedule are included as Attachment A to this recommendation. Revisions include updates to the avoided unit, dates, and payment information which reflect the current economic and financial assumptions for the avoided unit. In addition, some maintenance costs were shifted from variable operations & maintenance (O&M) to fixed O&M, based on TECO’s use of service contracts for periodic CT maintenance.
TECO’s proposed standard offer also includes two revisions related to indemnification and insurance required for interconnection. The first revision references state and federal law relating to government entities, and acknowledges that in the event of a claim, legislative action may be required above certain amounts. The second revision allows for a self-insurance option for companies upon approval by TECO, with an annual requirement for the renewable generator to demonstrate its continued ability to self-insure. The option to self-insure increases the flexibility of the standard offer for renewable generators. All of the changes made to the revised rate schedule sheets, as well as the economic and financial assumptions used in the contract, are consistent with the updated unit.
Conclusion
The provisions of the revised
standard offer contract and related rate schedule COG-2 conform to all
requirements of Rules 25-17.200 through 25-17.310, F.A.C. The revised standard
offer contract provides flexibility in the arrangements for payments so that a
developer of renewable generation may select the payment stream best suited to
its financial needs. Staff recommends that the revised standard offer contract
and related rate schedule COG-2 be approved as filed.
Issue 2: Should this docket be closed?
Recommendation:
Yes. This docket should be closed upon issuance of a consummating order, unless a person whose substantial interests are affected by the Commission’s decision files a protest within 21 days of the issuance of the Commission’s proposed agency action order. Potential signatories should be aware that, if a timely protest is filed, TECO’s standard offer contract may subsequently be revised. (Corbari)
Staff Analysis:
This docket should be closed upon issuance of a consummating order, unless a person whose substantial interests are affected by the Commission’s decision files a protest within 21 days of the issuance of the Commission’s proposed agency action order. Potential signatories should be aware that, if a timely protest is filed, TECO’s standard offer contract may subsequently be revised.