Changes in appearance and in display of formulas, tables, and text may have occurred during translation of this document into an electronic medium. This HTML document may not be an accurate version of the official document and should not be relied on.
For an official paper copy, contact the Florida Public Service Commission at contact@psc.state.fl.us or call (850) 413-6770. There may be a charge for the copy.
|
|
||
DATE: |
|||
TO: |
Office of Commission Clerk (Stauffer) |
||
FROM: |
Division of Economics (Ollila) Office of the General Counsel (Janjic) |
||
RE: |
|||
AGENDA: |
05/05/16 – Regular Agenda – Tariff Filing – Interested Persons May Participate |
||
COMMISSIONERS ASSIGNED: |
|||
PREHEARING OFFICER: |
|||
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: |
|||
On April 1, 2016, Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) filed a petition for approval of 2016 revisions to its underground residential and commercial differential tariffs and associated charges. These tariffs represent the additional costs FPL incurs to provide underground service in place of overhead service. The Commission has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Sections 366.03, 366.04, 366.05, and 366.06, Florida Statutes (F.S.).
Issue 1:
Should FPL’s proposed underground differential tariffs be suspended?
Recommendation:
Yes. Staff recommends that the tariffs be suspended to allow staff sufficient time to review the petition and gather all pertinent information in order to present the Commission with an informed recommendation on the tariff proposals. (Ollila)
Staff Analysis:
Staff recommends that the tariffs be suspended to allow staff sufficient time to review the petition and gather all pertinent information in order to present the Commission with an informed recommendation on the tariff proposals.
Pursuant to Section 366.06(3), F.S., the Commission may withhold consent to the operation of all or any portion of a new rate schedule, delivering to the utility requesting such a change a reason or written statement of good cause for doing so within 60 days. Staff believes that the reason stated above is a good cause consistent with the requirement of Section 366.06(3), F.S.
Issue 2:
Should this docket be closed?
Recommendation:
This docket should remain open pending the Commission’s decision on the proposed tariffs. (Janjic)
Staff Analysis:
This docket should remain open pending the Commission’s decision on the proposed tariffs.