State of Florida

pscSEAL

 

Public Service Commission

Capital Circle Office Center ● 2540 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0850

-M-E-M-O-R-A-N-D-U-M-

 

DATE:

May 26, 2016

TO:

Office of Commission Clerk (Stauffer)

FROM:

Division of Engineering (Lee)

Office of the General Counsel (Lherisson)

RE:

Docket No. 160072-EQ – Petition for approval of new standard offer for purchase of firm capacity and energy from renewable energy facilities or small qualifying facilities and approval of tariff schedule REF-1, by Gulf Power Company.

AGENDA:

06/09/16Regular Agenda – Proposed Agency Action –  Interested Persons May Participate

COMMISSIONERS ASSIGNED:

All Commissioners

PREHEARING OFFICER:

Administrative

CRITICAL DATES:

None

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:

Staff recommends the Commission simultaneously consider Docket Nos. 160069-EQ, 160072-EQ, and 160073-EQ.

 

 Case Background

Section 366.91(3), Florida Statutes (F.S.), requires that each investor-owned utility (IOU) continuously offers to purchase capacity and energy from renewable energy generators. Florida Public Service Commission (Commission) Rules 25-17.200 through 25-17.310, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), implement the statute and require each IOU to file with the Commission by April 1 of each year, a standard offer contract based on the next avoidable fossil fueled generating unit of each technology type identified in the utility’s current Ten-Year Site Plan. On April 1, 2016, Gulf Power Company (Gulf) filed a petition for approval of its standard offer contract and rate schedule REF-1 for renewable energy facilities or small qualifying facilities based on its 2016 Ten-Year Site Plan. The Commission has jurisdiction over this standard offer contract pursuant to Sections 366.04 through 366.06 and 366.91, F.S.


Discussion of Issues

Issue 1: 

 Should the Commission approve the revised standard offer contract and schedule REF-1 filed by Gulf Power Company?

Recommendation: 

 Yes. The provisions of Gulf’s revised standard offer contract and schedule REF-1 conform to all requirements of Rules 25-17.200 through 25-17.310, F.A.C. Gulf’s revised standard offer contract provides flexibility in the arrangements for payments so that a developer of renewable generation may select the payment stream best suited to its financial needs. (Lee)

Staff Analysis: 

 Rule 25-17.250, F.A.C., requires that Gulf, an IOU, continuously makes available a standard offer contract for the purchase of firm capacity and energy from renewable generating facilities (RF) and small qualifying facilities (QF) with design capacities of 100 kilowatts (kW) or less. Pursuant to Rule 25-17.250(1) and (3), F.A.C., the standard offer contract must provide a term of at least 10 years, and the payment terms must be based on the utility’s next avoidable fossil-fueled generating unit identified in its most recent Ten-Year Site Plan or, if no avoided unit is identified, its next avoidable planned purchase.

Gulf has identified a natural gas-fired facility consisting of three combustion turbine units totaling 654 megawatt (MW), as its next planned fossil-fueled generating unit in its 2016 Ten-Year Site Plan. The projected in-service date of this facility is June 1, 2023.

The RF/QF operator may elect to make no commitment as to the quantity or timing of its deliveries to Gulf, and to have a committed capacity of zero (0) MW. Under such a scenario, the energy is delivered on an as-available basis and the operator receives only an energy payment. Alternatively, the RF/QF operator may elect to commit to certain minimum performance requirements based on the identified avoided unit, such as being operational and delivering an agreed upon amount of capacity by the in-service date of the avoided unit, and thereby becomes eligible for capacity payments in addition to payments received for energy. The standard offer contract may also serve as a starting point for negotiation of contract terms by providing payment information to an RF/QF operator, in a situation where one or both parties desire particular contract terms other than those established in the standard offer.

In order to promote renewable generation, the Commission requires the IOU to offer multiple options for capacity payments, including the options to receive early or levelized payments. If the RF/QF operator elects to receive capacity payments under the normal or levelized contract options, it will receive as-available energy payments only until the in-service date of the avoided unit (in this case June 1, 2023), and thereafter begin receiving capacity payments in addition to the energy payments. If either the early or levelized option is selected, then the operator will begin receiving capacity payments earlier than the in-service date of the avoided unit. However, payments made under the early capacity payments options tend to be lower in the later years of the contract term because the net present value (NPV) of the total payments must remain equal for all contract payment options.

 

 

Table 1 below, estimates the annual payments for each payment option available under the revised standard offer contract to an operator with a 50 MW facility operating at a capacity factor of 95 percent and meeting the minimum requirement specified in the contract to qualify for full capacity payments. Normal and levelized capacity payments begin in 2023, reflecting the projected in-service date of the avoided unit (June 1, 2023).

 

 

Table 1 – Estimated Annual Payments to a 50 MW Renewable Facility

(95% Capacity Factor)

Year

Energy Payment

Capacity Payment (By Type)

Normal

Levelized

Early

Early Levelized

$(000)

$(000)

$(000)

$(000)

$(000)

2017

11,905

-

-

1,325

1,556

2018

13,998

-

-

1,361

1,566

2019

15,208

-

-

1,399

1,576

2020

16,548

-

-

1,437

1,587

2021

17,380

-

-

1,477

1,598

2022

18,105

-

-

1,518

1,609

2023

19,382

1,519

1,705

1,560

1,620

2024

20,182

2,660

2,938

1,602

1,632

2025

20,976

2,733

2,958

1,647

1,644

2026

22,270

2,808

2,979

1,692

1,657

2027

23,547

2,886

3,001

1,739

1,670

2028

24,621

2,965

3,023

1,786

1,683

2029

25,931

3,047

3,046

1,836

1,697

2030

26,360

3,131

3,069

1,886

1,711

2031

27,284

3,217

3,093

1,938

1,725

2032

28,443

3,306

3,118

1,992

1,740

2033

29,863

3,397

3,143

2,046

1,755

2034

31,495

3,490

3,169

2,103

1,771

2035

32,656

3,586

3,196

2,161

1,787

2036

 

34,564

3,685

3,223

2,220

1,803

Total

460,717

42,431

41,660

34,724

33,384

NPV (2017$)

232,745

18,343

18,343

18,343

18,343

 

Gulf’s standard offer contract and schedule REF-1, in type-and-strike format, are included as Attachment A. All of the changes made to the tariff sheets are consistent with the updated avoided unit. Revisions include updates to the avoided unit, dates, and payment information which reflect the current economic and financial assumptions for the avoided unit costs.

Conclusion

The provisions of Gulf’s revised standard offer contract and schedule REF-1 conform to all requirements of Rules 25-17.200 through 25-17.310, F.A.C. The revised standard offer contract provides flexibility in the arrangements for payments so that a developer of renewable generation my select the payment stream best suited to its financial needs. Staff recommends that Gulf’s revised standard offer contract and schedule REF-1 be approved as filed.


Issue 2: 

 Should this docket be closed?

Recommendation: 

 Yes. This docket should be closed upon issuance of a consummating order, unless a person whose substantial interests are affected by the Commission’s decision files a protest within 21 days of the issuance of the Commission’s Proposed Agency Action Order. Potential signatories should be aware that, if a timely protest is filed, Gulf’s standard offer contract may subsequently be revised. (Lherisson)

Staff Analysis: 

 This docket should be closed upon the issuance of a consummating order, unless a person whose substantial interests are affected by the Commission’s decision files a protest within 21 days of the issuance of the Commission’s Proposed Agency Action Order. Potential signatories should be aware that, if a timely protest is filed, Gulf’s standard offer contract may subsequently be revised.