State of Florida |
Public Service Commission Capital Circle Office Center ● 2540 Shumard
Oak Boulevard -M-E-M-O-R-A-N-D-U-M- |
||
DATE: |
|||
TO: |
Office of Commission Clerk (Stauffer) |
||
FROM: |
Office of Telecommunications (Fogleman, Long, Williams) Office of the General Counsel (Page) |
||
RE: |
|||
AGENDA: |
07/13/17 – Regular Agenda – Proposed Agency Action for Issue 1 – Issue 2 is Procedural – Interested Persons May Participate |
||
COMMISSIONERS ASSIGNED: |
|||
PREHEARING OFFICER: |
|||
September 1, 2017 – Effective date of Florida Telecommunications Relay, Inc. budget. Notification of any change in the Telecommunications Access System Act surcharge must be made to carriers prior to September 1, 2017 under staff’s recommendation. |
|||
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: |
Anticipate the need for sign language interpreters and assisted listening devices. Please place near the beginning of the agenda to reduce interpreter costs. |
||
The Florida Relay System provides deaf and hard of hearing persons access to basic telecommunications services by using a specialized Communications Assistant that relays information between the deaf or hard of hearing person and the other party to the call. The primary function of the Florida Relay System is accomplished by the deaf or hard of hearing person using a Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD). The person using the TDD types a message to the Communications Assistant who in turn voices the message to the other party, or a Captioned Telephone which displays real-time captions of the conversation.
The Telecommunications Access System Act of 1991 (TASA) established a statewide telecommunications relay system which became effective May 24, 1991. Section 427.701(1), Florida Statutes (F.S.), provides that the Florida Public Service Commission (Commission or FPSC) shall establish, implement, promote, and oversee the administration of the statewide telecommunications access system to provide access to telecommunications relay services by persons who are deaf, hard of hearing or speech impaired, or others who communicate with them. It is estimated that approximately 2.5 to 3 million of the estimated 20 million persons living in Florida have been diagnosed as having a hearing loss.[1] This system provides telecommunications service for deaf or hard of hearing persons functionally equivalent to the service provided to hearing persons.
TASA provides funding for the distribution of specialized telecommunications devices and provision of intrastate relay service through the imposition of a surcharge of up to $.25 per landline access line per month. Accounts with over 25 access lines are billed for only 25 lines. Pursuant to Section 427.704(4)(a)1, F.S., a surcharge is collected only from landline access lines.[2]
Florida Telecommunications Relay, Inc. (FTRI), a non-profit corporation formed by the local exchange telephone companies, was selected by the Commission to serve as the Telecommunications Access System Act Administrator. On July 1, 1991, the local exchange telecommunications companies began collecting an initial $.05 per access line surcharge pursuant to Order No. 24581. Since July 1, 1991 the surcharge, which is currently $.11 per month, has changed to reflect FTRI budgetary needs.
Chapter 427, F.S., requires that the relay system comply with regulations adopted by the FCC to implement Title IV of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The FCC mandates the minimum requirements for services a state must provide, certifies each state program, and periodically proposes changes that must be provided.
Staff sent an initial data request to FTRI on a number of issues included in its proposed budget. FTRI’s responses to staff’s data request were submitted on March 9, 2017, and are included in the docket file. Staff also sent subsequent data requests to FTRI regarding the 2017/2018 budget. Attachment A is FTRI’s letter to the Commission presenting its proposed budget that was approved by its Board of Directors. FTRI also compared its proposed budget to last year’s Commission approved budget and estimated revenue and expenses for the current fiscal year. FTRI’s estimated revenues and expenses were based on data for the first two quarters of the fiscal year.
On May 15, 2017, FTRI filed updated third quarter financial information at staff’s request. With additional financial information, staff formulated new estimated budget results for Fiscal Year 2016/2017 based on the additional information filed. This additional data is reflected in staff’s estimate in Attachment B.
The purpose of this recommendation is to address FTRI’s proposed Fiscal Year 2017/2018 budget and determine what the relay surcharge should be for the upcoming fiscal year. The Commission is vested with jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 427, F.S.
Issue 1:
Should the Commission approve FTRI’s proposed budget as presented in Attachment A for Fiscal Year 2017/2018, effective September 1, 2017, and should the Commission reduce the current Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) surcharge from $0.11 per month to $0.10 per month?
Recommendation:
No. Staff recommends that the Commission reduce FTRI’s proposed budget expenses for Fiscal Year 2017/2018 by $81,954 for Regional Distribution Center (RDC) expenses and by $36,000 for Legal expenses as presented in Option 1. Staff recommends that the Commission order the incumbent local exchange companies, competitive local exchange companies, and shared tenant providers to discontinue billing the $0.11 monthly surcharge, and bill the $0.10 surcharge for Fiscal Year 2017/2018, effective September 1, 2017. Staff also recommends that the Commission order FTRI to require detailed, itemized bills from its legal counsel and conduct in-house analyses for Insurance-Health/Life/Disability and Retirement expenses. Staff recommends that FTRI be ordered to provide the results of its analyses to staff by January 31, 2018. (Fogleman, Long, Williams)
Staff Analysis:
Traditional
Telecommunications Relay Service
Minutes of use for traditional TRS have been declining. The traditional TRS cost to FTRI as approved in Sprint’s contract is currently $1.09 per session minute. Sprint’s projections indicate that traditional minutes will continue to decline during the 2017/2018 Fiscal Year. Traditional relay users are transitioning to the following services:
· Internet Protocol (IP) Relay[3]
· Video Relay Service (VRS)[4]
· Captioned Telephone (CapTel) Service[5]
· Internet Protocol Captioned Telephone Service[6]
· Internet Protocol Speech-to-Speech (STS) Service[7]
· Wireless Service[8]
CapTel
Service
CapTel service uses a specialized telephone that provides captioning of the incoming call for a deaf or hard of hearing person. Sprint’s projections show that CapTel minutes of use will also decrease during the 2017/2018 Fiscal Year. The CapTel cost to FTRI as approved in the Sprint contract is currently $1.63 per session minute.
Florida
Telecommunications Relay Inc. Budget
Attachment A reflects FTRI’s 2017/2018 Fiscal Year proposed budget, which was reviewed and adopted by FTRI’s Board of Directors prior to filing with the Commission. The proposed budget includes a decrease in expenses of approximately $1,230,462 from the Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Commission approved budget.
The FTRI 2017/2018 proposed budget projects total operating revenues to be $6,224,425 and total expenses to be $5,969,260. Based on the projected revenues and expense reductions, FTRI believes the Telecommunications Relay surcharge should be reduced by $0.01 from $0.11 to $0.10 per access line for the 2017/2018 Fiscal Year.
Sprint’s estimated Fiscal Year 2017/2018 traditional Telecommunications Relay surcharge minutes of use are 824,498 at a rate of $1.09 per minute for a total of $898,703. Sprint’s estimated CapTel minutes of use for Fiscal Year 2017/2018 are 810,223 at a rate of $1.63 per minute for a total of $1,320,663.
The biggest decrease in expense in the budget arises from relay provider services, resulting in $972,673 in savings when compared to the Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Commission approved budget.
A comparison of FTRI’s Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Commission approved budget, FTRI’s estimated revenues and expenses, and FTRI’s Fiscal Year 2017/2018 proposed budget as filed is shown in Table 1 below.
Table 1
FTRI Budget Comparison
|
Commission
Approved 2016-2017[9] |
FTRI
Estimated 2016-2017[10] |
FTRI
Proposed 2017-2018 |
Operating Revenue: |
|
|
|
Surcharges |
$7,297,393 |
$7,177,537 |
$6,170,576 |
Interest Income |
34,188 |
48,424 |
53,849 |
Total Operating Revenue |
$7,331,581 |
$7,225,961 |
$6,224,425 |
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
Relay Provider Services |
$3,192,039 |
$2,664,000 |
$2,219,366 |
Equipment & Repairs |
1,524,034 |
1,397,499 |
1,335,920 |
Equipment Distribution & Training |
953,908 |
873,742 |
855,892 |
Outreach |
574,626 |
574,626 |
558,976 |
General & Administrative |
955,115 |
930,947 |
999,106 |
Total Expenses |
$7,199,722 |
$6,440,814 |
$5,969,260 |
|
|
|
|
Annual Surplus |
$131,859 |
$785,147 |
$255,165 |
Surplus Account |
15,983,096 |
16,552,936 |
17,337,883 |
Total Surplus[11] |
$16,114,955 |
$17,338,083 |
$17,593,048 |
Source: FTRI’s Fiscal Year 2017/2018
proposed budget.
Analysis
In its budget filing, FTRI acknowledges that access lines have decreased at the rate of 4.8 percent during the past three years (2014-2016) and acknowledges that it believes that trend will continue as more consumers transition from landline phones to other technologies. As a result, FTRI’s revenues will be reduced as the number of access lines declines, holding the surcharge constant. Continued efforts by FTRI to reduce expenses are important.
Based on having third quarter data for Fiscal Year 2016/2017, staff developed its own estimate of FTRI’s expenses for Fiscal Year 2016/2017. This data is presented in Attachment B. For most expenses, staff used actual data from June 2016 through March 2017 and estimated the fourth quarter by averaging the first three quarters of the fiscal year. The exception is for Outreach where staff was informed that FTRI will spend the remaining funds in that account in the fourth quarter. Staff’s estimates were then used as one element in evaluating FTRI’s proposed budget. Attachment B includes FTRI’s budgeted information for comparison purposes. Below is staff’s review of selected items from FTRI’s proposed budget expense by category.
Category I – Relay Services
The basis of the relay service expense is the minutes of use as projected by Sprint. Sprint’s historical projections have proven to be reasonable and it has multi-state experience with such projections. As a result, staff believes that the estimates for Fiscal Year 2017/2018 are reasonable and should be used for budgetary purposes.[12]
Category II – Equipment & Repairs
Category II expenses reflect the purchases of equipment to be distributed to clients and the repairs that FRTI must do to keep the equipment in working order. Staff has reviewed FTRI’s work papers to determine the amounts of equipment purchased for the year. FTRI’s equipment budget reflected declines in equipment distribution, but includes equipment orders to maintain a sufficient inventory to serve its clients. FTRI used contract pricing for equipment multiplied by the number of units it plans to order over the course of the year. After comparing FTRI’s proposed budget with its own estimates for Fiscal Year 2016/2017, staff believes that FTRI’s proposed budget for Category II expenses is reasonable and supported in its work papers.
Category III – Equipment Distribution &
Training
Category III reflects the cost of distribution of equipment throughout the state and the training of consumers in the use of the equipment. FTRI contracts with non-profit Regional Distribution Centers (RDCs) to perform these functions throughout Florida. Currently there are 24 RDCs.
FTRI proposes a budget for Freight-Telecomm Equipment of $40,442 for Fiscal Year 2017/2018. This represents about a 3 percent increase from staff’s estimate for Fiscal Year 2016/2017. FTRI anticipates that it will experience increased expenses as the warranties of several equipment models have expired. As a result, FTRI will be responsible for the shipping of units for repair and replacement at FTRI’s expense. As a result, staff believes FTRI’s proposed budget is reasonable for this item.
The largest component for Category III relates to FTRI’s support of the RDCs. Staff notes that FTRI has added an additional RDC from last year. FTRI reports that of the $814,950 in its proposed budget, $732,762 is related to contracts supporting the distribution centers. FTRI’s contracts with RDCs vary the support amount based on the number of clients they assist. More funds are provided for connecting a new client, while fewer funds are provided to assist existing clients in the system.
The second largest expense for this line item of $70,048, relates to the maintenance and charges to support FTRI’s database. Additional costs are related to laptops and air card connectivity for access to FTRI’s database system by RDCs with sufficient activity to justify offsite distribution. The laptops and air cards represent an additional $11,640.
Category IV – Outreach
FTRI has requested $558,876, a decrease of $15,650 from last year’s budget for Outreach. This represents a reduction by 2.7 percent from last year. FTRI believes that newspaper outreach is reaching more eligible consumers and that it has had strong positive results. FTRI has indicated that it plans on spending the remaining funds from its FPSC approved budget in the fourth quarter. As a result, staff’s estimate for Fiscal Year 2016/2017 reflects that amount (Attachment B). RDCs are responsible for some of the outreach for regional events that are approved and funded by FTRI.
Category V – General & Administrative
Category V reflects the expenses associated with FTRI’s operations such as office and furnishings, employees, contracted services (auditors, attorney, and computer consultants), computers and other operating expenses (such as insurance and retirement). The number of staff at FTRI has remained the same from last year.
Staff acknowledges that the correlation between the decline in minutes of use and technology substitution for General and Administrative expense is not as direct as the correlation associated with service delivery and equipment distribution. However, staff believes efforts to control General and Administrative expenses are of equal importance.
Option 1: Staff Adjustments to FTRI’s Proposed
Budget
FTRI’s proposed 2017/2018 budget presents reduced expenses in Categories I-IV. However, staff believes additional reductions can be made in both Category III - Equipment Distribution & Training, and Category V - General & Administrative expenses. In staff’s analysis, staff compared actual expenses for the first three quarters and estimated the fourth quarter (using an average of the first three quarters) for Fiscal Year 2016-2017 to compare with FTRI’s proposed budget. In addition, staff reviewed the budget working papers supplied by FTRI. Based on this review, staff recommends the following adjustments and/or continued monitoring of the following expenses:
· Regional Distribution Centers
· Legal
· Insurance-Health/Life/Disability
· Retirement
FTRI recognizes that access lines have decreased at the rate of 4.8 percent during the past three years (2014 - 2016) and that this trend will likely continue. As discussed earlier, Relay and CapTel expenses from Sprint (Category I) are projected to decline as a result of reduced minutes. In addition, Equipment & Repairs expenses (Category II), Equipment Distribution & Training expenses (Category III), and Outreach expenses (Category IV) are projected to decline. FTRI’s proposed budget recognizes this trend as reflected in the proposed expense reductions associated with Categories I-IV. It is reasonable that FTRI’s proposed budget would present expense reductions in categories I-IV given the technology shift phenomenon.
Regional Distribution Centers (RDCs)
For costs related to the RDCs (Category III), staff notes that FTRI’s proposed budget includes a reduction relative to both FTRI’s approved budget (10 percent) and its estimated expenses (2 percent) for Fiscal Year 2016/2017. However, the rate of decline does not appear to correspond with the decline that was reported in the first three quarters of Fiscal Year 2016/2017.
As noted earlier, staff’s estimates are based on the first three quarters of Fiscal Year 2016/2017 and use an average of those quarters to estimate the last quarter. FTRI’s proposed budget would be an increase of approximately 11 percent when compared to staff’s estimate for Fiscal Year 2016/2017. FTRI’s own estimate for Fiscal Year 2016/2017 already reflected a reduction of $76,226 when compared to its approved budget. Most of the expenses related to the RDCs are related to RDC contracts. Since the expense of these contracts declines as the number of clients declines, it is reasonable to assume that the trend will continue and at best, level off. While FTRI did provide supporting work papers as requested for its proposed budget, that data did not include actual third quarter expenses. By comparison, staff’s estimate did include third quarter data. Staff believes that third quarter data does not support FTRI’s proposed estimate. As a result, staff recommends FTRI’s budget for RDCs be reduced by $81,954 to $732,996, which is staff’s estimate for Fiscal Year 2016/2017.
Legal Fees
Based on a review of supporting documents relating to Legal expense, staff has concerns regarding these expenses. FTRI has had the same law firm on retainer for many years. The attorney attends the board meetings and writes the minutes, reviews Request For Proposals, reviews contracts, and advises on legal issues as they arise. It would appear that paying the attorney an hourly rate may be more cost effective than paying a retainer. At a minimum, staff recommends that such legal invoices should be itemized with date of services, charges for the services, and a detailed description of the services provided by legal counsel.
Staff recommends that FTRI’s proposed 2017/2018 Fiscal Year budget line item for Legal expense be reduced by $36,000. Staff requested that FTRI provide any contracts, letters of engagement or other agreements for legal services. FTRI submitted a long-standing contract for legal services for a flat retainer of $72,000 per year, excluding any travel or litigation costs. The monthly invoices submitted did not show sufficient detail of services performed, hours spent, hourly rate, or other relevant information for staff to have a basis to justify the contract amount. At $370 per hour, approximately 195 hours would have to be spent to justify the retainer. The current contract retainer is over twice the amount the Commission recently approved to litigate a Class B water and wastewater rate case.[13]
Staff is not convinced that the contract amount is required to perform the regular annual non-litigation services for FTRI. Based on staff’s review of the information provided, we conclude that the billable minutes associated with the services contracted may be more in line with an expense of $36,000. More detailed billing information is necessary to allow for further analysis in next year’s budget. Staff recommends that FTRI collect such billing information to include itemized invoices to FTRI with date of services, charges for the services, hours of service, price per hour, and a detailed description of the services provided by legal counsel.
In-House Analyses
Insurance
FTRI provides health, dental, vision, basic life, short-term disability, and long-term disability insurance to its employees. While this insurance may be beneficial to the employee, it goes beyond what an organization must offer its employees. Currently, employees pay part of the premiums related to their health insurance, which may include dental and vision. We believe that FTRI should compare the benefits offered based on its size and similarly situated organizations.
Retirement
Currently, 11.1 percent of salaries are contributed to a retirement account for the employees. Employees are not required to pay for any of their retirement. The retirement budget is based on estimated compensation for ten employees, a three percent salary increase, and estimated overtime ($49,406). In addition, this includes a retirement plan surcharge of 2.78 percent on gross compensation for the first half of the budget year and a 5.55 surcharge for the second half of the year ($18,538). In addition there is a charge of $5,790 to the Pension Benefit Guarantee Cooperation. NTCA Retirement and Security is FTRI’s retirement plan provider. NTCA has made plan cost increases and funding requirements changes. FTRI has decided to maintain the current contribution of 11.1 percent; however, employee future benefits are reduced from a 1.83 to a 1.54 benefit accrual rate with this decision. Future cost increases are under evaluation by FTRI.
Staff recommends that FTRI conduct in-house analyses for the expense items for Insurance-Health/Life/Disability and Retirement and submit its findings to the Commission. These analyses should include price quotes from other providers for insurance and retirement plans. The insurance and retirements benefits should include benefits offered by comparably-sized nonprofit and for profit entities. Staff recommends that FTRI submit the results of the analysis to staff by January 31, 2018 for review.
Surcharge
Staff recommends that the Commission order the incumbent local exchange companies, competitive local exchange companies, and shared tenant providers to discontinue billing the $0.11 monthly surcharge, and bill the $0.10 surcharge for fiscal year 2017/2018, effective September 1, 2017.
Option 2: The Budget as Proposed by FTRI
In Option 2, FTRI’s proposed Fiscal Year 2017/2018 budget operating revenue of $6,224,425 and proposed budget expenses of $5,969,260 would be approved, and the current TRS surcharge of $0.11 per access line per month would be reduced to $0.10. FTRI’s proposed 2017/2018 budget presents reduced expenses in Categories I-IV. The proposed budget was approved by FTRI’s Board of Directors.
As discussed earlier, Relay and CapTel expenses from Sprint (Category I) are projected to decline as a result of reduced minutes. In addition, Equipment & Repairs expenses (Category II), Equipment Distribution & Training expenses (Category III), and Outreach expenses (Category IV) are projected to decline. FTRI’s proposed budget recognizes this trend as reflected in the proposed expense reductions associated with Categories I-IV.
Although staff recommends approval of FTRI’s proposed budget, staff believes a continued effort to reduce expenses is needed. As stated earlier, staff recommends that the Commission order FTRI to require detailed, itemized bills from its legal counsel and conduct an in-house analysis for expense items for Insurance-Health/Life/Disability and Retirement. Staff recommends that FTRI be ordered to provide the results of the analysis to staff by January 31, 2018 for review.
Conclusion
Staff
believes FTRI’s expense reductions in Categories I-IV are steps in the right
direction to better position FTRI in a changing industry. However, a sustained
effort is necessary for FTRI to strategically position itself in a rapidly
changing environment. In staff Option 1, staff has identified four expense
line items in FTRI’s proposed 2017/2018 budget that should be reduced or warrant
further analysis. These include RDC, Legal, Insurance-Health/Life/Disability,
and Retirement expenses.
Staff recommends that the
Commission reduce FTRI’s proposed budget expenses for Fiscal Year 2017/2018 by
$81,954 for RDC expenses and by $36,000 for Legal expenses as presented in
Option 1. Staff recommends that the Commission order the incumbent local
exchange companies, competitive local exchange companies, and shared tenant
providers to discontinue billing the $0.11 monthly surcharge, and bill the
$0.10 surcharge for Fiscal Year 2017/2018, effective September 1, 2017. Staff
also recommends that the Commission order FTRI to require detailed, itemized
bills from its legal counsel and conduct in-house analyses for Insurance-Health/Life/Disability
and Retirement expenses. Staff recommends that FTRI be ordered to provide the
results of the analyses to staff by January 31, 2018.
Issue 2:
Should the Commission approve the appointment of Ms. Elizabeth Bradin to the TASA Advisory Committee effective immediately?
Recommendation:
Yes. Staff recommends that the Commission approve the appointment of Ms. Elizabeth Bradin to the TASA Advisory Committee effective immediately. (Williams, Page)
Staff Analysis:
Section 427.706, F.S., provides that the Commission
shall appoint an advisory committee of up
to 10 members to assist the Commission
with Florida’s relay system. The advisory committee shall include, among
others, two members from telecommunications companies. Ms. Bradin will be one
of these representatives.
By statute, the
advisory committee provides the expertise, experience, and perspective of
persons who are deaf, hard of hearing, or speech impaired to the Commission and the administrator during all
phases of the development and operation of the telecommunications access
system. The advisory committee advises the Commission and the administrator on
the quality and cost-effectiveness of the telecommunications relay service and
the specialized telecommunications devices distribution system. Members of the
committee are not compensated for their services but are entitled to per diem
and travel expenses provided through the Florida Public Service Commission’s
Regulatory Trust Fund.
Ms. Bradin is
currently employed in Legislative and Regulatory Affairs for CenturyLink. Ms.
Bradin’s job duties include advocating company issues at the state and local
level, filing CenturyLink regulatory items, and assisting with business
development by working with other CenturyLink departments and outside vendors.
Staff recommends that the Commission approve the appointment of Ms. Elizabeth Bradin to the TASA Advisory Committee effective immediately.
Issue 3:
Should this docket be closed?
Recommendation: No. A Consummating Order should be issued for Issue 1, unless a person whose substantial interests are affected by the Commission’s decision files a protest within 21 days of the issuance of the proposed agency action. The docket should remain open to address all matters related to relay service throughout the life of the current Sprint contract. (Page)
Staff Analysis:
A Consummating Order should be issued for Issue 1, unless a person whose substantial interests are affected by the Commission’s decision files a protest within 21 days of the issuance of the proposed agency action. The docket should remain open to address all matters related to relay service throughout the life of the current Sprint contract.
Option 1 |
Option 2 |
|||||
2016/2017 APPROVED BUDGET |
2016/2017 FTRI ESTIMATED |
2016/2017 FPSC STAFF ESTIMATED |
2017/2018 FPSC PROPOSED BUDGET |
2017/2018 FTRI PROPOSED BUDGET |
||
REVENUE |
||||||
1 |
Surcharge |
7,297,393 |
7,177,537 |
7,177,537 |
6,273,379
|
6,170,576
|
2 |
Interest |
34,188 |
48,424 |
48,424 |
53,849 |
53,849 |
3 |
NDBEDP[14] |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE |
7,331,581 |
7,225,961 |
7,225,961 |
6,327,228 |
6,224,425 |
|
4 |
Surplus Account[15] |
15,983,096 |
16,552,936 |
16,552,936 |
17,337,883 |
17,337,883 |
TOTAL REVENUE |
23,314,677 |
23,778,897 |
23,778,897 |
23,665,111 |
23,562,308 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES |
||||||
CATEGORY I - RELAY
SERVICES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
DPR Provider |
3,192,039 |
2,664,000 |
2,664,000 |
2,219,366
|
2,219,366
|
SUBTOTAL CATEGORY I |
3,192,039 |
2,664,000 |
2,664,000 |
2,219,366
|
2,219,366
|
|
CATEGORY II - EQUIPMENT
& REPAIRS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
TDD Equipment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
7 |
Large Print TDD |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8 |
VCO/HCO-TDD |
1,533 |
4,600 |
6,133
|
4,600 |
4,600 |
9 |
VCO-Telephone |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
10 |
Dual Sensory Equipment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
11 |
CapTel Phone Equipment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
12 |
VCP Hearing Impaired |
1,415,745 |
1,300,675 |
1,233,219 |
1,249,948
|
1,249,948
|
13 |
VCP Speech Impaired |
689 |
1,063 |
1,109 |
832 |
832 |
14 |
TeliTalk Speech Aid |
7,200 |
9,000 |
7,200
|
9,000 |
9,000 |
15 |
Infrared/Hands Free |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
16 |
In Line Amplifier |
- |
300 |
400
|
300 |
300 |
17 |
ARS-Signaling Equipment |
1,589 |
2,400 |
2,717
|
2,400 |
2,400 |
18 |
VRS-Signaling Equipment |
6,968 |
3,193 |
6,608 |
2,921 |
2,921 |
19 |
Equipment
Accessories/Supplies |
481 |
791 |
823 |
1,580 |
1,580 |
20 |
Telecom Equipment Repair |
89,829 |
75,477 |
63,667 |
64,339 |
64,339 |
SUBTOTAL CATEGORY II |
1,524,034 |
1,397,499 |
1,321,726 |
1,335,920
|
1,335,920
|
|
CATEGORY III - EQUIPMENT
DISTRIBUTION & TRAINING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
Freight - Telecom Equipment |
43,225 |
39,909 |
39,137 |
40,442 |
40,442 |
22 |
Regional Distribution
Centers |
910,059
|
833,833
|
732,996
|
732,996
|
814,950 |
23 |
Workshop Expense |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
24 |
Training Expense for RDCs |
624 |
- |
- |
500 |
500 |
SUBTOTAL CATEGORY III |
953,908
|
873,742
|
772,133
|
773,938
|
855,892 |
|
CATEGORY IV – OUTREACH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
Outreach Expense |
574,626
|
574,626
|
574,626
|
558,976 |
558,976 |
SUBTOTAL CATEGORY IV |
574,626
|
574,626
|
574,626
|
558,976 |
558,976 |
|
CATEGORY V - GENERAL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
Advertising |
1,340 |
15 |
20 |
658 |
658 |
27 |
Accounting/Audit |
26,140 |
22,414 |
27,119 |
20,533 |
20,533 |
28 |
Legal |
71,400 |
72,000 |
72,000 |
36,000 |
72,000 |
29 |
Consultation-Computer |
7,187 |
7,187 |
7,289 |
5,580 |
5,580 |
30 |
Dues/Subscriptions |
3,439 |
1,714 |
1,957 |
1,655 |
1,655 |
31 |
Office Furniture |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
32 |
Office Equipment Purchase |
4,507 |
4,109 |
4,271 |
6,667 |
6,667 |
33 |
Office Equipment Lease |
1,695 |
1,870 |
1,937 |
1,827 |
1,827 |
34 |
Insurance
-Health/Life/Disability |
125,343
|
140,903
|
128,707
|
175,345 |
175,345 |
35 |
Insurance-Other |
10,748 |
9,449 |
9,764 |
10,075 |
10,075 |
36 |
Office Expense |
14,197 |
14,035 |
13,179 |
13,719 |
13,719 |
37 |
Postage |
4,489 |
7,541 |
5,389 |
7,541 |
7,541 |
38 |
Printing |
719 |
1,514 |
2,072 |
1,514 |
1,514 |
39 |
Rent |
93,921 |
91,769 |
91,776 |
92,062 |
92,062 |
40 |
Utilities |
5,065 |
5,297 |
5,259 |
5,297 |
5,297 |
41 |
Retirement |
65,585 |
60,783 |
61,340 |
73,734 |
73,734 |
42 |
Employee Compensation |
434,973
|
422,644
|
417,707
|
445,106 |
445,106 |
43 |
Temporary Employment |
9,640 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
44 |
Taxes – Payroll |
33,275 |
30,061 |
31,304 |
30,091 |
30,091 |
45 |
Taxes - Unemployment Comp |
2,012 |
1,829 |
2,171 |
1,725 |
1,725 |
46 |
Taxes – Licenses |
- |
61 |
- |
61 |
61 |
47 |
Telephone |
15,595 |
17,106 |
17,712 |
17,240 |
17,240 |
48 |
Travel & Business
Expense |
18,700 |
15,273 |
13,188 |
13,585 |
13,585 |
49 |
Equipment Maintenance |
937 |
736 |
951 |
746 |
746 |
50 |
Employee Training |
567 |
1,042 |
456 |
975 |
975 |
51 |
Meeting Expense |
3,641 |
1,595 |
1,240 |
1,370 |
1,370 |
52 |
Miscellaneous |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
SUBTOTAL CATEGORY V |
955,115
|
930,947
|
916,808
|
963,106 |
999,106 |
|
CATEGORY VI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
NDBEDP[16] |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
SUBTOTAL CATEGORY VI |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
TOTAL EXPENSES |
7,199,722 |
6,440,814 |
6,249,443 |
5,851,306 |
5,969,260
|
|
REVENUES LESS EXPENSES |
131,859
|
785,147
|
976,518 |
475,922 |
255,165 |
[1] 2015 Florida Coordinating Council for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Biennial Report to Governor Rick Scott, the Florida Legislature and the Supreme Court and “Demographics and Statistics,” Florida Telecommunications Relay, Inc., http://ftri.org/index.cfm/go/public.view/page/12, accessed on June 14, 2017.
[2] Florida Telecommunications Relay, Inc. projects a four
percent decrease in landline access lines subject to the relay surcharge for
the budget year 2017/2018.
[3]
IP Relay allows people who have difficulty hearing or speaking to
communicate through an Internet connection using a computer and the Internet,
rather than a TTY and a telephone.
[4] Video Relay Service enables persons with hearing disabilities who use American Sign Language to communicate with voice telephone users through video equipment, rather than through typed text. Video equipment links the VRS user with a TRS operator so that the VRS user and the operator can see and communicate with each other in signed conversation.
[5] A CapTel telephone is a telephone that displays real-time captions of a conversation.
[6] IP captioned telephone service allows the user to simultaneously listen to and read the text of what the other party in a telephone conversation has said, where the connection carrying the captions between the service and the user is via an IP addressed and routed link.
[7] Speech-to-Speech (STS) relay service utilizes a specially trained CA who understands the speech patterns of persons with speech disabilities and can repeat the words spoken by such an individual to the other party to the call. IP STS uses the Internet, rather than the public switched telephone network, to connect the consumer to the relay provider.
[8] Specifically, wireless services offer applications such as text, instant messaging, and Facetime.
[9] Staff determined that FTRI incorrectly presented its Equipment & Repair and Equipment Distribution & Training expenses in its March 1, 2017 budget filing with the Commission. The corrected numbers are presented in Table 1 and Attachment B.
[10] Staff determined that FTRI incorrectly presented its Equipment & Repair total in its March 1, 2017 budget filing with the Commission. The corrected number is presented in Table 1 and Attachment B.
[11] The Federal Communications Commission may mandate
state funding of Video Relay Service, Internet Protocol Relay Service, and
Internet Protocol Captioned Telephone Service. It is estimated that at a
minimum $32 million would be needed to adequately fund the state program. The Commission, by Order PSC-06-0469-PAA-TP, issued
June 1, 2006, in Docket No. 040763-TP, maintained the Florida
Telecommunications Relay Service surcharge at $0.15/month for one year in lieu
of a surcharge reduction, to prepare the state Telecommunications Relay Service
Fund for assuming intrastate costs of Video Relay Service and Internet Protocol
Relay, and to allow time to determine how the costs should be recovered should
the need arise.
[12] Staff is evaluating responses to the relay request for proposals and the current rates may change beginning March 1, 2018.
[13] Order No. PSC-17-0209-PAA-WU, Issued May 30, 2017, Docket No. 160065-WU, In re: Application for increase in water rates in Charlotte County by Bocilla Utilities, Inc. The Commission approved $370 per hour and $31,323 in legal fees for rate case expense.
[14] The National Deaf-Blind Equipment Distribution Program (NDBEDP) was administrated by FTRI in Florida, but was relinquished last year. As a result, this line item reflects a zero balance and was included for consistency with FRTI’s proposal.
[15] The surplus account represents funds collected to cover two months of operating expenses to offset fluctuations in funding and to partially cover expenses relating to video relay service when the FCC mandates that states pay for such expenses.
[16] The National Deaf-Blind Equipment Distribution Program (NDBEDP) was administrated by FTRI in Florida, but was relinquished last year. As a result, this line item reflects a zero balance and was included for consistency with FRTI’s proposal.